Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LBTYK vs CMCSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
LBTYK vs CMCSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $4.00B | $95.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.88B | $125.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7.14B | $18.60B |
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.4x |
| Total Debt | $10.16B | $110.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.08B | $9.48B |
LBTYK vs CMCSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) | 100 | 110.5 | +10.5% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 66.3 | -33.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LBTYK vs CMCSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LBTYK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth -5.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, current ratio 1.08x
- 12.4% revenue growth vs CMCSA's -0.0%
CMCSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- 15.4% 10Y total return vs LBTYK's -27.6%
- Beta 0.21, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.88x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs CMCSA's -0.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs LBTYK's -146.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs LBTYK's 0.57 | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.1% vs CMCSA's -19.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs LBTYK's -28.2%, ROIC 8.2% vs 0.1% |
LBTYK vs CMCSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LBTYK vs CMCSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 25.7x LBTYK's $4.9B. CMCSA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LBTYK's -146.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.9B | $125.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $35.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7.1B | $18.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $783M | $18.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -146.3% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | +5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -32.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LBTYK and CMCSA each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CMCSA's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LBTYK's 11.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $95.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.1B | $196.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.61x | 4.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.27x | 5.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.82x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.44x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CMCSA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMCSA delivers a 19.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-58 for LBTYK. LBTYK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMCSA's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CMCSA scores 7/9 vs LBTYK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -58.3% | +19.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.2% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.1% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.1B | $101.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.1B | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.2B | $110.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.07x | 6.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LBTYK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LBTYK five years ago would be worth $8,199 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,482 for CMCSA. Over the past 12 months, LBTYK leads with a +24.1% total return vs CMCSA's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LBTYK at 4.8% vs CMCSA's -9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.3% | -8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.1% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.2% | -26.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.0% | -45.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.6% | +15.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.8% | -9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LBTYK and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LBTYK's 0.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LBTYK currently trades 90.9% from its 52-week high vs CMCSA's 71.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.12 | $36.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.27 | $25.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.9% | +71.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 37.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 28.4M |
Analyst Outlook
CMCSA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LBTYK as "Buy" and CMCSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.5% upside for CMCSA (target: $32) vs 6.2% for LBTYK (target: $13). CMCSA is the only dividend payer here at 5.13% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.67 | $31.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.8% | +7.5% |
CMCSA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LBTYK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
LBTYK vs CMCSA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LBTYK or CMCSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) is the stronger pick with 12.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LBTYK or CMCSA?
Over the past 5 years, Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) delivered a total return of -18.
0%, compared to -45. 2% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMCSA returned +15. 4% versus LBTYK's -27. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LBTYK or CMCSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus Liberty Global plc's 0. 57β — meaning LBTYK is approximately 170% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 102% versus 113% for Comcast Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LBTYK or CMCSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) is pulling ahead at 12.
4% versus -0. 0% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Comcast Corporation grew EPS 30. 2% year-over-year, compared to -564. 8% for Liberty Global plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, LBTYK leads at 6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LBTYK or CMCSA?
Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
0% net margin versus -146. 3% for Liberty Global plc — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMCSA leads at 16. 7% versus 0. 7% for LBTYK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMCSA leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LBTYK or CMCSA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMCSA: 21.
5% to $31. 87.
07Which pays a better dividend — LBTYK or CMCSA?
In this comparison, CMCSA (5.
1% yield) pays a dividend. LBTYK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is LBTYK or CMCSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 5. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +15. 4%, LBTYK: -27. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LBTYK and CMCSA?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LBTYK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CMCSA pays a dividend while LBTYK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 189%
- Gross Margin > 15%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.