Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LCFY vs LKFN vs FFIN vs YELP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Internet Content & Information
LCFY vs LKFN vs FFIN vs YELP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $7M | $1.63B | $4.61B | $1.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $422M | $739M | $1.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $103M | $243M | $139M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 61.0% | 70.8% | 90.0% |
| Operating Margin | -65.3% | 29.8% | 36.8% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.4x | 15.9x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $631K | $184M | $197M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $595K | $57M | $763M | $216M |
LCFY vs LKFN vs FFIN vs YELP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Locafy Limited (LCFY) | 100 | 8.8 | -91.2% |
| Lakeland Financial … (LKFN) | 100 | 85.8 | -14.2% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 73.4 | -26.6% |
| Yelp Inc. (YELP) | 100 | 83.5 | -16.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LCFY vs LKFN vs FFIN vs YELP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LCFY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LKFN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 3.2%
- 142.7% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 145.4%
- Beta 0.79, yield 3.2%, current ratio 0.03x
- NIM 3.2% vs FFIN's 3.1%
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 3.05 vs LKFN's 3.63
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs LCFY's -22.8%
- 30.2% margin vs LCFY's -71.8%
YELP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 19.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 2.99x
- Better valuation composite
- 14.1% ROA vs LCFY's -44.8%, ROIC 25.1% vs -82.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs LCFY's -22.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.2% margin vs LCFY's -71.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs LCFY's 2.08 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.0% vs YELP's -19.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.1% ROA vs LCFY's -44.8%, ROIC 25.1% vs -82.7% |
LCFY vs LKFN vs FFIN vs YELP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LCFY vs LKFN vs FFIN vs YELP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LKFN leads in 3 of 6 categories
YELP leads 2 • FFIN leads 1 • LCFY leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YELP is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 404.0x LCFY's $4M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LCFY's -71.8%. On growth, YELP holds the edge at +0.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $422M | $739M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$690,177 | $130M | $310M | $236M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $103M | $243M | $139M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $104M | $290M | $281M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +61.0% | +70.8% | +90.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -65.3% | +29.8% | +36.8% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -71.8% | +24.5% | +30.2% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -56.1% | +24.6% | +39.6% | +19.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.2% | — | — | +0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.3% | +23.4% | -7.7% | -16.7% |
Valuation Metrics
YELP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.7x trailing earnings, YELP trades at a 39% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LKFN offers better value at 3.93x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $1.6B | $4.6B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $1.8B | $4.0B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.37x | 15.61x | 20.76x | 12.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.42x | 15.92x | 13.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.93x | 3.98x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.49x | 14.17x | 6.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.19x | 3.87x | 6.23x | 1.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.67x | 2.12x | 2.89x | 2.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.72x | 15.73x | 5.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP delivers a 19.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-68 for LCFY. YELP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LKFN's 0.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LKFN scores 6/9 vs LCFY's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -68.2% | +14.2% | +13.3% | +19.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.8% | +1.5% | +1.6% | +14.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -82.7% | +11.6% | +11.0% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -107.5% | +15.8% | +16.0% | +22.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.24x | 0.12x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $36,519 | $127M | -$566M | -$174M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $594,671 | $57M | $763M | $216M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $631,190 | $184M | $197M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.67x | 0.82x | 1.48x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LKFN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LKFN five years ago would be worth $11,052 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $617 for LCFY. Over the past 12 months, LKFN leads with a +9.0% total return vs YELP's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LKFN at 14.0% vs LCFY's -19.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +40.6% | +12.7% | +8.5% | -5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.6% | +9.0% | -3.2% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.0% | +48.1% | +29.1% | +1.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | +10.5% | -28.2% | -27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | +142.7% | +145.4% | +10.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.1% | +14.0% | +8.9% | +0.5% |
Risk & Volatility
LKFN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LKFN is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LCFY's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LKFN currently trades 90.2% from its 52-week high vs LCFY's 29.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.08x | 0.79x | 0.95x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.98 | $69.40 | $38.74 | $41.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.50 | $54.36 | $28.11 | $19.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.5% | +90.2% | +83.6% | +69.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.5 | 60.9 | 58.2 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 153K | 740K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
LKFN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LKFN as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", YELP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -0.5% for YELP (target: $28). For income investors, LKFN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.19% vs FFIN's 2.22%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $66.00 | $39.25 | $28.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 15 | 67 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +2.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 11 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.00 | $0.72 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% | +17.3% |
LKFN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). YELP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
LCFY vs LKFN vs FFIN vs YELP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LCFY or LKFN or FFIN or YELP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 8% for Locafy Limited (LCFY). Yelp Inc. (YELP) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LCFY or LKFN or FFIN or YELP?
On trailing P/E, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the cheapest at 12. 7x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Yelp Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. wins at 3. 05x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 63x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LCFY or LKFN or FFIN or YELP?
Over the past 5 years, Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) delivered a total return of +10.
5%, compared to -93. 8% for Locafy Limited (LCFY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +145. 4% versus LCFY's -93. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LCFY or LKFN or FFIN or YELP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus Locafy Limited's 2. 08β — meaning LCFY is approximately 164% more volatile than LKFN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yelp Inc. (YELP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 24% for Lakeland Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LCFY or LKFN or FFIN or YELP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -22. 8% for Locafy Limited (LCFY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Yelp Inc. grew EPS 19. 1% year-over-year, compared to -4. 3% for Locafy Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, YELP leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LCFY or LKFN or FFIN or YELP?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -134. 7% for Locafy Limited — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -129. 2% for LCFY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LCFY leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LCFY or LKFN or FFIN or YELP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 05x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 63x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Yelp Inc. (YELP) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — LCFY or LKFN or FFIN or YELP?
In this comparison, LKFN (3.
2% yield), FFIN (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. LCFY, YELP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LCFY or LKFN or FFIN or YELP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 3. 2% yield, +142. 7% 10Y return). Locafy Limited (LCFY) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LKFN: +142. 7%, LCFY: -93. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LCFY and LKFN and FFIN and YELP?
These companies operate in different sectors (LCFY (Communication Services) and LKFN (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and YELP (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LCFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LKFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; YELP is a small-cap deep-value stock. LKFN, FFIN pay a dividend while LCFY, YELP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.