Auto - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LCID vs GM vs F vs RIVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
Auto - Manufacturers
Auto - Manufacturers
LCID vs GM vs F vs RIVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $2.00B | $70.70B | $47.73B | $17.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.12B | $184.62B | $189.86B | $5.53B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.36B | $2.54B | $-6.11B | $-3.52B |
| Gross Margin | -145.0% | 6.1% | 9.2% | -1.7% |
| Operating Margin | -339.6% | 1.3% | 1.8% | -68.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.2x | 7.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $861M | $130.28B | $167.57B | $6.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $998M | $20.95B | $23.36B | $3.58B |
LCID vs GM vs F vs RIVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 100 | 135.5 | +35.5% |
| Ford Motor Company (F) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| Rivian Automotive, … (RIVN) | 100 | 11.9 | -88.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LCID vs GM vs F vs RIVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LCID is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 67.6%, EPS growth 3.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.6%
- 67.6% revenue growth vs GM's -1.3%
GM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 180.2% 10Y total return vs F's 36.2%
- Better valuation composite
- 1.4% margin vs LCID's -300.4%
- +73.8% vs LCID's -73.1%
F is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 6.2%
- Beta 0.97, yield 6.2%, current ratio 1.07x
- Beta 0.97 vs LCID's 2.03
- 6.2% yield, vs GM's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
RIVN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.59, current ratio 2.33x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 67.6% revenue growth vs GM's -1.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.4% margin vs LCID's -300.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs LCID's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield, vs GM's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.8% vs LCID's -73.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.9% ROA vs LCID's -40.0%, ROIC 1.3% vs -98.7% |
LCID vs GM vs F vs RIVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LCID vs GM vs F vs RIVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GM leads in 2 of 6 categories
F leads 1 • LCID leads 0 • RIVN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
F leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
F is the larger business by revenue, generating $189.9B annually — 169.7x LCID's $1.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.4% (GM) to -3.0% (LCID). On growth, RIVN holds the edge at +11.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $184.6B | $189.9B | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3.6B | $15.5B | $10.0B | -$3.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.4B | $2.5B | -$6.1B | -$3.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4.7B | $12.5B | $11.9B | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -145.0% | +6.1% | +9.2% | -1.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +1.3% | +1.8% | -68.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +1.4% | -3.2% | -63.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +6.8% | +6.3% | -45.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -0.9% | +6.4% | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.2% | -15.2% | +4.3% | +31.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GM and F each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GM's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than F's 22.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $70.7B | $47.7B | $17.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $180.0B | $191.9B | $20.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.50x | 23.98x | -5.91x | -4.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.22x | 7.72x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.29x | 22.51x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.48x | 0.38x | 0.25x | 3.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.64x | 1.21x | 1.35x | 3.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.38x | 3.83x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GM delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-193 for LCID. LCID carries lower financial leverage with a 1.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to F's 4.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GM scores 6/9 vs F's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -193.0% | +3.8% | -14.7% | -69.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.0% | +0.9% | -2.1% | -23.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -98.7% | +1.3% | +1.0% | -36.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.2% | +1.6% | +1.4% | -29.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.20x | 2.06x | 4.66x | 1.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$137M | $109.3B | $144.2B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $998M | $20.9B | $23.4B | $3.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $861M | $130.3B | $167.6B | $6.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -146.67x | 2.60x | 0.93x | -27.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GM five years ago would be worth $13,592 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $314 for LCID. Over the past 12 months, GM leads with a +73.8% total return vs LCID's -73.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GM at 33.4% vs LCID's -57.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.7% | -3.0% | -7.6% | -26.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.1% | +73.8% | +24.3% | +11.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.2% | +137.4% | +17.8% | +2.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.9% | +35.9% | +32.9% | -85.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | +180.2% | +36.2% | -85.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -57.2% | +33.4% | +5.6% | +0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GM and F each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
F is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LCID's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GM currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs LCID's 18.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 1.07x | 0.97x | 1.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.70 | $87.62 | $14.80 | $22.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.62 | $44.97 | $9.88 | $11.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.0% | +89.5% | +82.3% | +62.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.4 | 55.4 | 49.3 | 38.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.9M | 6.7M | 42.5M | 26.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GM and F each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LCID as "Hold", GM as "Buy", F as "Hold", RIVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.4% upside for LCID (target: $14) vs 14.6% for F (target: $14). For income investors, F offers the higher dividend yield at 6.17% vs GM's 0.86%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $91.75 | $13.96 | $18.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 51 | 46 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | +6.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.68 | $0.75 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). F leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
LCID vs GM vs F vs RIVN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LCID or GM or F or RIVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lucid Group, Inc.
(LCID) is the stronger pick with 67. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for General Motors Company (GM). General Motors Company (GM) offers the better valuation at 24. 0x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate General Motors Company (GM) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LCID or GM or F or RIVN?
On forward P/E, General Motors Company is actually cheaper at 6.
2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LCID or GM or F or RIVN?
Over the past 5 years, General Motors Company (GM) delivered a total return of +35.
9%, compared to -96. 9% for Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GM returned +180. 2% versus LCID's -93. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LCID or GM or F or RIVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ford Motor Company (F) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
97β versus Lucid Group, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning LCID is approximately 109% more volatile than F relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 120% versus 5% for Ford Motor Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LCID or GM or F or RIVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lucid Group, Inc.
(LCID) is pulling ahead at 67. 6% versus -1. 3% for General Motors Company (GM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rivian Automotive, Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to -241. 1% for Ford Motor Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, RIVN leads at 48. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LCID or GM or F or RIVN?
General Motors Company (GM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
5% net margin versus -199. 3% for Lucid Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GM leads at 1. 6% versus -258. 7% for LCID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — F leads at 12. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LCID or GM or F or RIVN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, General Motors Company (GM) trades at 6.
2x forward P/E versus 7. 7x for Ford Motor Company — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LCID: 131. 4% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LCID or GM or F or RIVN?
In this comparison, F (6.
2% yield), GM (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. LCID, RIVN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LCID or GM or F or RIVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, General Motors Company (GM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
07), 0. 9% yield, +180. 2% 10Y return). Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GM: +180. 2%, LCID: -93. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LCID and GM and F and RIVN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LCID is a small-cap high-growth stock; GM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; F is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; RIVN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. GM, F pay a dividend while LCID, RIVN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.