Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LCID vs GM vs F vs RIVN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.00B
5Y Perf.-98.9%
GM
General Motors Company

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$70.70B
5Y Perf.+35.5%
F
Ford Motor Company

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$47.73B
5Y Perf.-36.5%
RIVN
Rivian Automotive, Inc.

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$17.56B
5Y Perf.-88.1%

LCID vs GM vs F vs RIVN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LCID logoLCID
GM logoGM
F logoF
RIVN logoRIVN
IndustryAuto - ManufacturersAuto - ManufacturersAuto - ManufacturersAuto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$2.00B$70.70B$47.73B$17.56B
Revenue (TTM)$1.12B$184.62B$189.86B$5.53B
Net Income (TTM)$-3.36B$2.54B$-6.11B$-3.52B
Gross Margin-145.0%6.1%9.2%-1.7%
Operating Margin-339.6%1.3%1.8%-68.9%
Forward P/E6.2x7.7x
Total Debt$861M$130.28B$167.57B$6.65B
Cash & Equiv.$998M$20.95B$23.36B$3.58B

LCID vs GM vs F vs RIVNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LCID
GM
F
RIVN
StockNov 21May 26Return
Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID)1001.1-98.9%
General Motors Comp… (GM)100135.5+35.5%
Ford Motor Company (F)10063.5-36.5%
Rivian Automotive, … (RIVN)10011.9-88.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LCID vs GM vs F vs RIVN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Ford Motor Company is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. LCID also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

LCID is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 67.6%, EPS growth 3.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.6%
  • 67.6% revenue growth vs GM's -1.3%
Best for: growth exposure
GM
General Motors Company
The Long-Run Compounder

GM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 180.2% 10Y total return vs F's 36.2%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 1.4% margin vs LCID's -300.4%
  • +73.8% vs LCID's -73.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
F
Ford Motor Company
The Income Pick

F is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 6.2%
  • Beta 0.97, yield 6.2%, current ratio 1.07x
  • Beta 0.97 vs LCID's 2.03
  • 6.2% yield, vs GM's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
RIVN
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

RIVN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.59, current ratio 2.33x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLCID logoLCID67.6% revenue growth vs GM's -1.3%
ValueGM logoGMBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsGM logoGM1.4% margin vs LCID's -300.4%
Stability / SafetyF logoFBeta 0.97 vs LCID's 2.03
DividendsF logoF6.2% yield, vs GM's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)GM logoGM+73.8% vs LCID's -73.1%
Efficiency (ROA)GM logoGM0.9% ROA vs LCID's -40.0%, ROIC 1.3% vs -98.7%

LCID vs GM vs F vs RIVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LCIDLucid Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Regulatory Credits
100.0%$96M
GMGeneral Motors Company
FY 2025
GMNA
91.4%$322.3B
GM Financial Segment
4.8%$17.1B
GMI
3.8%$13.4B
Cruise
0.0%$1M
FFord Motor Company
FY 2025
Ford Credit
100.0%$13.3B
RIVNRivian Automotive, Inc.
FY 2025
Automotive
71.1%$3.8B
Software And Services
28.9%$1.6B

LCID vs GM vs F vs RIVN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGMLAGGINGRIVN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

F leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

F is the larger business by revenue, generating $189.9B annually — 169.7x LCID's $1.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.4% (GM) to -3.0% (LCID). On growth, RIVN holds the edge at +11.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.GM logoGMGeneral Motors Co…F logoFFord Motor CompanyRIVN logoRIVNRivian Automotive…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.1B$184.6B$189.9B$5.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$3.6B$15.5B$10.0B-$3.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$3.4B$2.5B-$6.1B-$3.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4.7B$12.5B$11.9B-$2.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-145.0%+6.1%+9.2%-1.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.4%+1.3%+1.8%-68.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.0%+1.4%-3.2%-63.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.2%+6.8%+6.3%-45.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%-0.9%+6.4%+11.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-44.2%-15.2%+4.3%+31.3%
F leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — GM and F each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, GM's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than F's 22.5x.

MetricLCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.GM logoGMGeneral Motors Co…F logoFFord Motor CompanyRIVN logoRIVNRivian Automotive…
Market CapShares × price$2.0B$70.7B$47.7B$17.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.9B$180.0B$191.9B$20.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.50x23.98x-5.91x-4.62x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.22x7.72x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.29x22.51x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.48x0.38x0.25x3.26x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.64x1.21x1.35x3.66x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.38x3.83x
Evenly matched — GM and F each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

GM delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-193 for LCID. LCID carries lower financial leverage with a 1.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to F's 4.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GM scores 6/9 vs F's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricLCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.GM logoGMGeneral Motors Co…F logoFFord Motor CompanyRIVN logoRIVNRivian Automotive…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-193.0%+3.8%-14.7%-69.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-40.0%+0.9%-2.1%-23.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-98.7%+1.3%+1.0%-36.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-49.2%+1.6%+1.4%-29.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93634
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.20x2.06x4.66x1.45x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$137M$109.3B$144.2B$3.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$998M$20.9B$23.4B$3.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$861M$130.3B$167.6B$6.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-146.67x2.60x0.93x-27.31x
GM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GM five years ago would be worth $13,592 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $314 for LCID. Over the past 12 months, GM leads with a +73.8% total return vs LCID's -73.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GM at 33.4% vs LCID's -57.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.GM logoGMGeneral Motors Co…F logoFFord Motor CompanyRIVN logoRIVNRivian Automotive…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-45.7%-3.0%-7.6%-26.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-73.1%+73.8%+24.3%+11.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.2%+137.4%+17.8%+2.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.9%+35.9%+32.9%-85.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.9%+180.2%+36.2%-85.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-57.2%+33.4%+5.6%+0.8%
GM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GM and F each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

F is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LCID's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GM currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs LCID's 18.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.GM logoGMGeneral Motors Co…F logoFFord Motor CompanyRIVN logoRIVNRivian Automotive…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.03x1.07x0.97x1.59x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$33.70$87.62$14.80$22.69
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.62$44.97$9.88$11.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+18.0%+89.5%+82.3%+62.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10034.455.449.338.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded12.9M6.7M42.5M26.7M
Evenly matched — GM and F each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — GM and F each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LCID as "Hold", GM as "Buy", F as "Hold", RIVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.4% upside for LCID (target: $14) vs 14.6% for F (target: $14). For income investors, F offers the higher dividend yield at 6.17% vs GM's 0.86%.

MetricLCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.GM logoGMGeneral Motors Co…F logoFFord Motor CompanyRIVN logoRIVNRivian Automotive…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.00$91.75$13.96$18.36
# AnalystsCovering analysts15514628
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%+6.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises40
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.68$0.75
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+8.5%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — GM and F each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

GM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). F leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.

Best OverallGeneral Motors Company (GM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LCID vs GM vs F vs RIVN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LCID or GM or F or RIVN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lucid Group, Inc.

(LCID) is the stronger pick with 67. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for General Motors Company (GM). General Motors Company (GM) offers the better valuation at 24. 0x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate General Motors Company (GM) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LCID or GM or F or RIVN?

On forward P/E, General Motors Company is actually cheaper at 6.

2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LCID or GM or F or RIVN?

Over the past 5 years, General Motors Company (GM) delivered a total return of +35.

9%, compared to -96. 9% for Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GM returned +180. 2% versus LCID's -93. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LCID or GM or F or RIVN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ford Motor Company (F) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

97β versus Lucid Group, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning LCID is approximately 109% more volatile than F relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 120% versus 5% for Ford Motor Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LCID or GM or F or RIVN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lucid Group, Inc.

(LCID) is pulling ahead at 67. 6% versus -1. 3% for General Motors Company (GM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rivian Automotive, Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to -241. 1% for Ford Motor Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, RIVN leads at 48. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LCID or GM or F or RIVN?

General Motors Company (GM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.

5% net margin versus -199. 3% for Lucid Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GM leads at 1. 6% versus -258. 7% for LCID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — F leads at 12. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LCID or GM or F or RIVN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, General Motors Company (GM) trades at 6.

2x forward P/E versus 7. 7x for Ford Motor Company — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LCID: 131. 4% to $14. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LCID or GM or F or RIVN?

In this comparison, F (6.

2% yield), GM (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. LCID, RIVN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LCID or GM or F or RIVN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, General Motors Company (GM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

07), 0. 9% yield, +180. 2% 10Y return). Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GM: +180. 2%, LCID: -93. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LCID and GM and F and RIVN?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LCID is a small-cap high-growth stock; GM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; F is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; RIVN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. GM, F pay a dividend while LCID, RIVN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LCID

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GM

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

F

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RIVN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LCID and GM and F and RIVN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LCID: -100.0% · GM: -0.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.