LE
Lands' End, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$353M
5Y Perf.+84.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LE vs GIII
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GIII
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.+203.0%
LE vs GIII — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | LE | GIII |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $353M | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.34B | $2.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $67M |
| Gross Margin | 47.6% | 38.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | 5.3% |
| Forward P/E | 15.5x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $407M |
LE vs GIII — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LE
GIII
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lands' End, Inc. (LE) | 100 | 184.1 | +84.1% |
| G-III Apparel Group… (GIII) | 100 | 303.0 | +203.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LE vs GIII
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GIII leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Lands' End, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LE
Lands' End, Inc.
The Income Pick
LE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.89
- Rev growth -2.0%, EPS growth -10.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.0%
- -2.0% revenue growth vs GIII's -7.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
GIII
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
The Long-Run Compounder
GIII carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -27.0% 10Y total return vs LE's -48.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.08, Low D/E 0.7%
- Beta 1.08
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LE | -2.0% revenue growth vs GIII's -7.0% |
| Value | GIII | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 15.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | GIII | 2.3% margin vs LE's 0.4% |
| Stability / Safety | GIII | Beta 1.08 vs LE's 1.89, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LE | +50.1% vs GIII's +21.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GIII | 2.6% ROA vs LE's 0.7%, ROIC 7.5% vs 8.9% |
LE vs GIII — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
LE vs GIII — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGIIILAGGINGLE
LELands' End, Inc.
2leads
GIIIG-III Apparel Group, …
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
LE4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
GIII3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GIII6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GIII5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GIII2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
LE1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GIII is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 2.2x LE's $1.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.3% (GIII) to 0.4% (LE). On growth, LE holds the edge at +4.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | LELands' End, Inc. | GIIIG-III Apparel Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $76M | $186M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $67M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.6% | +38.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +5.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.7% | -8.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.2% | -169.7% |
LE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
GIII leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.7x trailing earnings, GIII trades at a 68% valuation discount to LE's 64.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LE's 4.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GIII's 5.0x.
| Metric | LELands' End, Inc. | GIIIG-III Apparel Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $353M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $367M | $926M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 64.22x | 20.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.48x | 10.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.93x | 4.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 0.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 0.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.31x | — |
GIII leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GIII leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GIII delivers a 3.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $2 for LE. GIII carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LE's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LE scores 5/9 vs GIII's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | LELands' End, Inc. | GIIIG-III Apparel Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | +3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.9% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.3% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | -$395M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $407M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $12M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.25x | 275.62x |
GIII leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GIII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GIII five years ago would be worth $9,133 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,763 for LE. Over the past 12 months, LE leads with a +50.1% total return vs GIII's +21.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GIII at 24.8% vs LE's 17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LELands' End, Inc. | GIIIG-III Apparel Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.8% | +6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.1% | +21.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.0% | +94.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.4% | -8.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.5% | -27.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.7% | +24.8% |
GIII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GIII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GIII is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LE's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GIII currently trades 89.9% from its 52-week high vs LE's 57.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LELands' End, Inc. | GIIIG-III Apparel Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.04 | $34.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.65 | $20.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.7% | +89.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.2 | 62.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 419K | 522K |
GIII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
LE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LE as "Buy" and GIII as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.7% upside for LE (target: $17) vs 7.8% for GIII (target: $34).
| Metric | LELands' End, Inc. | GIIIG-III Apparel Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.50 | $33.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | 0.0% |
LE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
GIII leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LE leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallG-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
LE vs GIII: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LE or GIII a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lands' End, Inc.
(LE) is the stronger pick with -2. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII). G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII) offers the better valuation at 20. 7x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lands' End, Inc. (LE) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LE or GIII?
On trailing P/E, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
(GIII) is the cheapest at 20. 7x versus Lands' End, Inc. at 64. 2x. On forward P/E, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LE or GIII?
Over the past 5 years, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
(GIII) delivered a total return of -8. 7%, compared to -52. 4% for Lands' End, Inc. (LE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GIII returned -27. 0% versus LE's -48. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LE or GIII?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
(GIII) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Lands' End, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning LE is approximately 76% more volatile than GIII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 13% for Lands' End, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LE or GIII?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lands' End, Inc.
(LE) is pulling ahead at -2. 0% versus -7. 0% for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lands' End, Inc. grew EPS -10. 0% year-over-year, compared to -64. 0% for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GIII leads at -2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LE or GIII?
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
(GIII) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 3% net margin versus 0. 4% for Lands' End, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GIII leads at 5. 3% versus 3. 3% for LE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LE leads at 46. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LE or GIII more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
(GIII) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 5x for Lands' End, Inc. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LE: 42. 7% to $16. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — LE or GIII?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LE or GIII better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
(GIII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08)). Lands' End, Inc. (LE) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GIII: -27. 0%, LE: -48. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LE and GIII?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(LE: 4.7% · GIII: -8.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(LE: 64.2x · GIII: 20.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.