Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LFUS vs STM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LFUS
Littelfuse, Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.11B
5Y Perf.+181.3%
STM
STMicroelectronics N.V.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • NL
Market Cap$49.68B
5Y Perf.+138.1%

LFUS vs STM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LFUS logoLFUS
STM logoSTM
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsSemiconductors
Market Cap$11.11B$49.68B
Revenue (TTM)$2.49B$12.40B
Net Income (TTM)$-40M$145M
Gross Margin38.3%33.8%
Operating Margin2.8%3.5%
Forward P/E31.6x49.8x
Total Debt$946M$2.13B
Cash & Equiv.$563M$2.84B

LFUS vs STMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LFUS
STM
StockMay 20May 26Return
Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS)100281.3+181.3%
STMicroelectronics … (STM)100238.1+138.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LFUS vs STM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LFUS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. STMicroelectronics N.V. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LFUS
Littelfuse, Inc.
The Income Pick

LFUS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.76, yield 0.7%
  • Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth -172.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.76, Low D/E 39.0%, current ratio 2.69x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
STM
STMicroelectronics N.V.
The Long-Run Compounder

STM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs LFUS's 317.6%
  • 1.2% margin vs LFUS's -1.6%
  • +144.0% vs LFUS's +132.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLFUS logoLFUS8.9% revenue growth vs STM's -10.8%
ValueLFUS logoLFUSLower P/E (31.6x vs 49.8x)
Quality / MarginsSTM logoSTM1.2% margin vs LFUS's -1.6%
Stability / SafetyLFUS logoLFUSBeta 1.76 vs STM's 2.05
DividendsLFUS logoLFUS0.7% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs STM's 0.6%
Momentum (1Y)STM logoSTM+144.0% vs LFUS's +132.6%
Efficiency (ROA)STM logoSTM0.6% ROA vs LFUS's -1.0%, ROIC 1.3% vs 1.0%

LFUS vs STM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LFUSLittelfuse, Inc.
FY 2025
Electronics Segment
56.4%$1.3B
Transportation Segment
28.3%$676M
Industrial Products
15.3%$364M
STMSTMicroelectronics N.V.
FY 2025
Product
98.0%$11.8B
Service
1.6%$193M
Product and Service, Other
0.4%$46M

LFUS vs STM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLFUSLAGGINGSTM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — LFUS and STM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

STM is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.4B annually — 5.0x LFUS's $2.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.2% (STM) to -1.6% (LFUS). On growth, STM holds the edge at +22.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLFUS logoLFUSLittelfuse, Inc.STM logoSTMSTMicroelectronic…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.5B$12.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$227M$2.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$40M$145M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$390M$160M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.3%+33.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.8%+3.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-1.6%+1.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.7%+1.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.5%+22.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+69.1%-33.3%
Evenly matched — LFUS and STM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LFUS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, LFUS's 83.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STM's 122.1x.

MetricLFUS logoLFUSLittelfuse, Inc.STM logoSTMSTMicroelectronic…
Market CapShares × price$11.1B$49.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$11.5B$49.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-152.27x310.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.31.59x49.82x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple83.21x122.07x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.66x4.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.53x2.83x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF30.35x
LFUS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

STM leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

STM delivers a 0.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-2 for LFUS. STM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LFUS's 0.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STM scores 6/9 vs LFUS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricLFUS logoLFUSLittelfuse, Inc.STM logoSTMSTMicroelectronic…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-1.6%+0.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.0%+0.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.0%+1.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.1%+1.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.39x0.12x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$383M-$704M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$563M$2.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$946M$2.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.93x28.71x
STM leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — LFUS and STM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LFUS five years ago would be worth $17,185 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,376 for STM. Over the past 12 months, STM leads with a +144.0% total return vs LFUS's +132.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LFUS at 20.1% vs STM's 10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLFUS logoLFUSLittelfuse, Inc.STM logoSTMSTMicroelectronic…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+68.5%+104.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+132.6%+144.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+73.3%+32.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+71.8%+53.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+317.6%+981.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+20.1%+10.0%
Evenly matched — LFUS and STM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LFUS and STM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LFUS is the less volatile stock with a 1.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STM's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STM currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs LFUS's 93.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLFUS logoLFUSLittelfuse, Inc.STM logoSTMSTMicroelectronic…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.77x2.07x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$475.00$58.01
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$188.08$21.11
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.0%+96.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10076.287.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded265K9.8M
Evenly matched — LFUS and STM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LFUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates LFUS as "Buy" and STM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.9% upside for STM (target: $58) vs -1.5% for LFUS (target: $435). For income investors, LFUS offers the higher dividend yield at 0.65% vs STM's 0.62%.

MetricLFUS logoLFUSLittelfuse, Inc.STM logoSTMSTMicroelectronic…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$435.00$57.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts1229
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises165
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.89$0.35
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%+0.7%
LFUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LFUS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). STM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallLittelfuse, Inc. (LFUS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LFUS vs STM: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LFUS or STM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Littelfuse, Inc.

(LFUS) is the stronger pick with 8. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 8% for STMicroelectronics N. V. (STM). STMicroelectronics N. V. (STM) offers the better valuation at 310. 6x trailing P/E (49. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LFUS or STM?

On forward P/E, Littelfuse, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 31. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LFUS or STM?

Over the past 5 years, Littelfuse, Inc.

(LFUS) delivered a total return of +71. 8%, compared to +53. 8% for STMicroelectronics N. V. (STM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STM returned +1042% versus LFUS's +331. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LFUS or STM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Littelfuse, Inc.

(LFUS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 77β versus STMicroelectronics N. V. 's 2. 07β — meaning STM is approximately 17% more volatile than LFUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, STMicroelectronics N. V. (STM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 39% for Littelfuse, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LFUS or STM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Littelfuse, Inc.

(LFUS) is pulling ahead at 8. 9% versus -10. 8% for STMicroelectronics N. V. (STM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: STMicroelectronics N. V. grew EPS -89. 2% year-over-year, compared to -172. 5% for Littelfuse, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LFUS leads at -1. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LFUS or STM?

STMicroelectronics N.

V. (STM) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 4% net margin versus -3. 0% for Littelfuse, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STM leads at 2. 7% versus 1. 6% for LFUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LFUS leads at 38. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LFUS or STM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Littelfuse, Inc.

(LFUS) trades at 31. 6x forward P/E versus 49. 8x for STMicroelectronics N. V. — 18. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STM: 2. 9% to $57. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LFUS or STM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) offers the highest yield at 0. 7%, versus 0. 6% for STMicroelectronics N. V. (STM).

09

Is LFUS or STM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, STMicroelectronics N.

V. (STM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +1042% 10Y return). Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STM: +1042%, LFUS: +331. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LFUS and STM?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

LFUS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LFUS and STM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LFUS: 18.5% · STM: 22.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.