Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LGL vs AVGO vs TXN vs MCHP vs SWKS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LGL
The LGL Group, Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyAMEX • US
Market Cap$38M
5Y Perf.-18.6%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.04T
5Y Perf.+1376.1%
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$262.15B
5Y Perf.+142.5%
MCHP
Microchip Technology Incorporated

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$53.62B
5Y Perf.+106.4%
SWKS
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.04B
5Y Perf.-43.7%

LGL vs AVGO vs TXN vs MCHP vs SWKS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LGL logoLGL
AVGO logoAVGO
TXN logoTXN
MCHP logoMCHP
SWKS logoSWKS
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$38M$2.04T$262.15B$53.62B$10.04B
Revenue (TTM)$4M$68.28B$18.44B$4.37B$4.04B
Net Income (TTM)$917K$24.97B$5.37B$-97M$361M
Gross Margin72.1%67.1%57.3%55.4%41.1%
Operating Margin-2.0%40.9%35.3%4.1%9.4%
Forward P/E90.0x38.0x38.1x63.2x13.4x
Total Debt$0.00$65.14B$15.39B$5.67B$1.20B
Cash & Equiv.$42M$16.18B$3.23B$772M$1.16B

LGL vs AVGO vs TXN vs MCHP vs SWKSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LGL
AVGO
TXN
MCHP
SWKS
StockMay 20May 26Return
The LGL Group, Inc. (LGL)10081.4-18.6%
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO)1001476.1+1376.1%
Texas Instruments I… (TXN)100242.5+142.5%
Microchip Technolog… (MCHP)100206.4+106.4%
Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS)10056.3-43.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LGL vs AVGO vs TXN vs MCHP vs SWKS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LGL and AVGO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Broadcom Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. SWKS and TXN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LGL
The LGL Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

LGL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 28.8%, EPS growth 54.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.33, current ratio 47.17x
  • 28.8% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
  • Beta 0.33 vs AVGO's 1.96
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

AVGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 30.2% 10Y total return vs TXN's 476.4%
  • 36.6% margin vs MCHP's -2.2%
  • +108.2% vs SWKS's +3.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
The Income Pick

TXN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 1.9%
  • Beta 1.09, yield 1.9%, current ratio 4.35x
  • 15.5% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.8%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
MCHP
Microchip Technology Incorporated
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, MCHP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
SWKS
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
The Value Play

SWKS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.

  • Lower P/E (13.4x vs 63.2x)
  • 4.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs TXN's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: value and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLGL logoLGL28.8% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
ValueSWKS logoSWKSLower P/E (13.4x vs 63.2x)
Quality / MarginsAVGO logoAVGO36.6% margin vs MCHP's -2.2%
Stability / SafetyLGL logoLGLBeta 0.33 vs AVGO's 1.96
DividendsSWKS logoSWKS4.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs TXN's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)AVGO logoAVGO+108.2% vs SWKS's +3.4%
Efficiency (ROA)TXN logoTXN15.5% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.8%

LGL vs AVGO vs TXN vs MCHP vs SWKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LGLThe LGL Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Electronic Instruments
100.0%$2M
AVGOBroadcom Inc.
FY 2025
Semiconductor Solutions
57.7%$36.9B
Infrastructure Software
42.3%$27.0B
TXNTexas Instruments Incorporated
FY 2025
Analog
83.9%$14.0B
Embedded Processing
16.1%$2.7B
MCHPMicrochip Technology Incorporated
FY 2025
Semiconductor Products Member
97.0%$4.3B
Technology Licensing Member
3.0%$131M
SWKSSkyworks Solutions, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LGL vs AVGO vs TXN vs MCHP vs SWKS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAVGOLAGGINGMCHP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AVGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $68.3B annually — 18656.3x LGL's $4M. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, AVGO holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLGL logoLGLThe LGL Group, In…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.TXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4M$68.3B$18.4B$4.4B$4.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$51,000$38.8B$8.1B$881M$842M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$917,000$25.0B$5.4B-$97M$361M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$408,000$28.9B$3.7B$820M$697M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+72.1%+67.1%+57.3%+55.4%+41.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.0%+40.9%+35.3%+4.1%+9.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+25.1%+36.6%+29.1%-2.2%+8.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.1%+42.3%+20.2%+18.8%+17.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-43.9%+29.5%+18.6%+15.6%-1.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.8%+31.6%+32.0%+164.2%-44.2%
AVGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SWKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 21.7x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 76% valuation discount to AVGO's 90.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWKS's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVGO's 60.9x.

MetricLGL logoLGLThe LGL Group, In…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.TXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…
Market CapShares × price$38M$2.04T$262.1B$53.6B$10.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$4M$2.09T$274.3B$58.5B$10.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS89.97x90.15x52.83x-9999.00x21.68x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.37.99x38.12x63.20x13.39x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.81x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple60.94x34.20x55.92x10.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue17.00x31.91x14.83x12.18x2.46x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.94x25.67x16.15x7.52x1.80x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF43.30x75.75x100.71x69.45x9.08x
SWKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TXN leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

AVGO delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. SWKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXN's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVGO scores 8/9 vs SWKS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLGL logoLGLThe LGL Group, In…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.TXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.2%+32.9%+32.5%-1.4%+6.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.1%+14.9%+15.5%-0.7%+4.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+14.9%+15.8%+1.8%+6.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-3.3%+16.9%+19.0%+2.1%+7.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–958755
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.80x0.95x0.80x0.21x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$42M$49.0B$12.2B$4.9B$42M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$42M$16.2B$3.2B$772M$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$65.1B$15.4B$5.7B$1.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense9.24x12.06x0.78x14.46x
TXN leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth $100,886 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,800 for SWKS. Over the past 12 months, AVGO leads with a +108.2% total return vs SWKS's +3.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVGO at 90.8% vs SWKS's -10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLGL logoLGLThe LGL Group, In…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.TXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+20.9%+23.9%+63.8%+53.1%+4.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+4.2%+108.2%+77.2%+105.4%+3.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+50.9%+594.1%+85.2%+40.6%-28.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-42.6%+908.9%+72.2%+48.7%-52.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+115.4%+3019.8%+476.4%+363.4%+33.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.7%+90.8%+22.8%+12.0%-10.7%
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LGL and TXN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AVGO's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXN currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs LGL's 71.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLGL logoLGLThe LGL Group, In…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.TXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.33x1.96x1.09x1.69x1.30x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.74$437.68$292.64$105.91$90.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.45$203.69$152.73$48.52$51.92
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+71.9%+98.2%+98.4%+93.6%+73.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.960.075.278.956.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5K23.1M6.7M9.1M3.3M
Evenly matched — LGL and TXN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — TXN and SWKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: AVGO as "Buy", TXN as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy", SWKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.3% upside for SWKS (target: $72) vs -11.9% for TXN (target: $254). For income investors, SWKS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.18% vs AVGO's 0.53%.

MetricLGL logoLGLThe LGL Group, In…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.TXN logoTXNTexas Instruments…MCHP logoMCHPMicrochip Technol…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$443.72$253.71$106.35$72.30
# AnalystsCovering analysts58654660
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%+1.9%+1.8%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01622512
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.30$5.48$1.82$2.79
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.3%+0.6%+0.2%+0.4%
Evenly matched — TXN and SWKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AVGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SWKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallBroadcom Inc. (AVGO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LGL vs AVGO vs TXN vs MCHP vs SWKS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LGL or AVGO or TXN or MCHP or SWKS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The LGL Group, Inc.

(LGL) is the stronger pick with 28. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) a "Buy" — based on 58 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LGL or AVGO or TXN or MCHP or SWKS?

On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus Broadcom Inc. at 90. 1x. On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LGL or AVGO or TXN or MCHP or SWKS?

Over the past 5 years, Broadcom Inc.

(AVGO) delivered a total return of +908. 9%, compared to -52. 0% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +30. 2% versus SWKS's +33. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LGL or AVGO or TXN or MCHP or SWKS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The LGL Group, Inc.

(LGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Broadcom Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning AVGO is approximately 490% more volatile than LGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 95% for Texas Instruments Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LGL or AVGO or TXN or MCHP or SWKS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The LGL Group, Inc.

(LGL) is pulling ahead at 28. 8% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadcom Inc. grew EPS 287. 8% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVGO leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LGL or AVGO or TXN or MCHP or SWKS?

Broadcom Inc.

(AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 2% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 36. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39. 9% versus -61. 4% for LGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVGO leads at 67. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LGL or AVGO or TXN or MCHP or SWKS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

(SWKS) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 63. 2x for Microchip Technology Incorporated — 49. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SWKS: 8. 3% to $72. 30.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LGL or AVGO or TXN or MCHP or SWKS?

In this comparison, SWKS (4.

2% yield), TXN (1. 9% yield), MCHP (1. 8% yield), AVGO (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. LGL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LGL or AVGO or TXN or MCHP or SWKS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

09), 1. 9% yield, +476. 4% 10Y return). Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXN: +476. 4%, AVGO: +30. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LGL and AVGO and TXN and MCHP and SWKS?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LGL is a small-cap high-growth stock; AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock; TXN is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SWKS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. AVGO, TXN, MCHP, SWKS pay a dividend while LGL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LGL

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AVGO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TXN

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MCHP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SWKS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LGL and AVGO and TXN and MCHP and SWKS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LGL: -43.9% · AVGO: 29.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(LGL: 25.1% · AVGO: 36.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LGL: 90.0x · AVGO: 90.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.