Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LGL vs MTSI vs QRVO vs SWKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
LGL vs MTSI vs QRVO vs SWKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $38M | $27.00B | $8.39B | $10.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $1.07B | $3.68B | $4.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $917K | $177M | $339M | $361M |
| Gross Margin | 72.1% | 55.3% | 45.9% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | -2.0% | 16.0% | 11.2% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 90.0x | 73.3x | 13.9x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $538M | $1.55B | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $112M | $1.22B | $1.16B |
LGL vs MTSI vs QRVO vs SWKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The LGL Group, Inc. (LGL) | 100 | 81.4 | -18.6% |
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 100 | 1133.5 | +1033.5% |
| Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) | 100 | 86.4 | -13.6% |
| Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS) | 100 | 56.3 | -43.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGL vs MTSI vs QRVO vs SWKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.33
- Rev growth 28.8%, EPS growth 54.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, current ratio 47.17x
- Beta 0.33, current ratio 47.17x
MTSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs LGL's 115.4%
- 32.6% revenue growth vs SWKS's -2.2%
- +200.8% vs SWKS's +3.4%
- 8.6% ROA vs LGL's 2.1%
QRVO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SWKS is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 13.9x)
- 4.2% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.6% revenue growth vs SWKS's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 13.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.1% margin vs SWKS's 8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs MTSI's 1.69 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +200.8% vs SWKS's +3.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs LGL's 2.1% |
LGL vs MTSI vs QRVO vs SWKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LGL vs MTSI vs QRVO vs SWKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SWKS leads in 2 of 6 categories
LGL leads 1 • MTSI leads 1 • QRVO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWKS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 1105.0x LGL's $4M. LGL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SWKS's 8.9%. On growth, MTSI holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $1.1B | $3.7B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$51,000 | $223M | $607M | $842M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $917,000 | $177M | $339M | $361M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $408,000 | $168M | $680M | $697M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.1% | +55.3% | +45.9% | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +16.0% | +11.2% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +16.5% | +9.2% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +15.6% | +18.5% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.9% | +22.5% | -7.0% | -1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.8% | +42.9% | -3.0% | -44.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SWKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.7x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 76% valuation discount to LGL's 90.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWKS's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTSI's 142.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38M | $27.0B | $8.4B | $10.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $27.4B | $8.7B | $10.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 89.97x | -492.99x | 25.01x | 21.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 73.25x | 13.90x | 13.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 142.12x | 21.20x | 10.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 17.00x | 27.91x | 2.28x | 2.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 20.06x | 2.53x | 1.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 43.30x | 140.00x | 12.35x | 9.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MTSI and QRVO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTSI delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $2 for LGL. SWKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QRVO's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QRVO scores 8/9 vs SWKS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.2% | +13.2% | +9.7% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +8.6% | +5.6% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +6.0% | +8.1% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.3% | +7.6% | +8.0% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.41x | 0.46x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$42M | $426M | $330M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $112M | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $538M | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 32.37x | 6.34x | 14.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTSI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTSI five years ago would be worth $67,774 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,800 for SWKS. Over the past 12 months, MTSI leads with a +200.8% total return vs SWKS's +3.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTSI at 87.1% vs SWKS's -10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.9% | +105.7% | +4.9% | +4.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.2% | +200.8% | +25.1% | +3.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.9% | +554.9% | -3.9% | -28.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.6% | +577.7% | -47.2% | -52.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.4% | +836.0% | +98.4% | +33.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +87.1% | -1.3% | -10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LGL and MTSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MTSI's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTSI currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs LGL's 71.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 1.69x | 1.26x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.74 | $364.00 | $106.30 | $90.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.45 | $117.05 | $71.64 | $51.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.9% | +98.9% | +85.2% | +73.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.9 | 79.1 | 56.5 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 1.1M | 1.2M | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
SWKS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MTSI as "Buy", QRVO as "Hold", SWKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.3% upside for SWKS (target: $72) vs -7.7% for MTSI (target: $332). SWKS is the only dividend payer here at 4.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $332.00 | $88.86 | $72.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 42 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +6.3% | +0.4% |
SWKS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). LGL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
LGL vs MTSI vs QRVO vs SWKS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGL or MTSI or QRVO or SWKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the stronger pick with 32. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LGL or MTSI or QRVO or SWKS?
On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus The LGL Group, Inc. at 90. 0x. On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LGL or MTSI or QRVO or SWKS?
Over the past 5 years, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) delivered a total return of +577. 7%, compared to -52. 0% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTSI returned +836. 0% versus SWKS's +33. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LGL or MTSI or QRVO or SWKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The LGL Group, Inc.
(LGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 69β — meaning MTSI is approximately 407% more volatile than LGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 46% for Qorvo, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LGL or MTSI or QRVO or SWKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is pulling ahead at 32. 6% versus -2. 2% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qorvo, Inc. grew EPS 524. 1% year-over-year, compared to -170. 2% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LGL leads at 15. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LGL or MTSI or QRVO or SWKS?
The LGL Group, Inc.
(LGL) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 4% net margin versus -5. 6% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTSI leads at 13. 4% versus -61. 4% for LGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTSI leads at 54. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LGL or MTSI or QRVO or SWKS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 73. 3x for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — 59. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SWKS: 8. 3% to $72. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — LGL or MTSI or QRVO or SWKS?
In this comparison, SWKS (4.
2% yield) pays a dividend. LGL, MTSI, QRVO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LGL or MTSI or QRVO or SWKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The LGL Group, Inc.
(LGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), +115. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LGL: +115. 4%, QRVO: +98. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LGL and MTSI and QRVO and SWKS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LGL is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTSI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; QRVO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SWKS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. SWKS pays a dividend while LGL, MTSI, QRVO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.