Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LGN vs HON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
LGN vs HON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $4.77B | $137.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.10B | $36.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10M | $4.10B |
| Gross Margin | 20.4% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 14.9% |
| Forward P/E | 102.6x | 20.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.70B | $34.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $12.49B |
Quick Verdict: LGN vs HON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 29.9%, EPS growth 121.2%
- 235.3% 10Y total return vs HON's 134.6%
- Beta 2.49, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.84x
HON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, current ratio 1.32x
- Lower P/E (20.6x vs 102.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.9% revenue growth vs HON's 7.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.6x vs 102.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.2% margin vs LGN's 0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs LGN's 2.49 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HON's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +235.3% vs HON's +5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs LGN's 0.4%, ROIC 12.6% vs 3.3% |
LGN vs HON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LGN vs HON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HON leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HON is the larger business by revenue, generating $36.8B annually — 17.5x LGN's $2.1B. HON is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LGN's 0.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $36.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $4.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +14.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +11.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -6.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -41.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HON leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.5x trailing earnings, HON trades at a 97% valuation discount to LGN's 1070.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HON's 20.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LGN's 37.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $137.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.4B | $159.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1070.79x | 29.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 102.56x | 20.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 16.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 37.78x | 20.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.27x | 3.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 9.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 465.26x | 25.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HON leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LGN scores 7/9 vs HON's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +23.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +12.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.2% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $22.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $12.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $34.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.29x | 3.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LGN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LGN five years ago would be worth $33,528 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,364 for HON. Over the past 12 months, LGN leads with a +235.3% total return vs HON's +5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LGN at 49.7% vs HON's 5.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +128.9% | +11.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +235.3% | +5.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +235.3% | +16.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +235.3% | +3.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +235.3% | +134.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +49.7% | +5.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LGN and HON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HON is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LGN's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LGN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs HON's 87.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.49x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $102.29 | $248.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.96 | $186.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +87.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 88.5 | 32.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 3.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LGN and HON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LGN as "Buy" and HON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.5% upside for HON (target: $244) vs -27.9% for LGN (target: $74). For income investors, LGN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.90% vs HON's 2.14%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $73.75 | $243.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.96 | $4.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.8% |
HON leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LGN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
LGN vs HON: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGN or HON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Legence Corp.
Class A Common stock (LGN) is the stronger pick with 29. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 8% for Honeywell International Inc. (HON). Honeywell International Inc. (HON) offers the better valuation at 29. 5x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Legence Corp. Class A Common stock (LGN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LGN or HON?
On trailing P/E, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the cheapest at 29. 5x versus Legence Corp. Class A Common stock at 1070. 8x. On forward P/E, Honeywell International Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LGN or HON?
Over the past 5 years, Legence Corp.
Class A Common stock (LGN) delivered a total return of +235. 3%, compared to +3. 6% for Honeywell International Inc. (HON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LGN returned +235. 3% versus HON's +134. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LGN or HON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Legence Corp. Class A Common stock's 2. 49β — meaning LGN is approximately 236% more volatile than HON relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — LGN or HON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legence Corp.
Class A Common stock (LGN) is pulling ahead at 29. 9% versus 7. 8% for Honeywell International Inc. (HON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Legence Corp. Class A Common stock grew EPS 121. 2% year-over-year, compared to -15. 5% for Honeywell International Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LGN or HON?
Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus 0. 5% for Legence Corp. Class A Common stock — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HON leads at 17. 5% versus 2. 8% for LGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HON leads at 36. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LGN or HON more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) trades at 20. 6x forward P/E versus 102. 6x for Legence Corp. Class A Common stock — 82. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HON: 12. 5% to $243. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — LGN or HON?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Legence Corp. Class A Common stock (LGN) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 2. 1% for Honeywell International Inc. (HON).
09Is LGN or HON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 2. 1% yield, +134. 6% 10Y return). Legence Corp. Class A Common stock (LGN) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HON: +134. 6%, LGN: +235. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LGN and HON?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; HON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.