LGVN
Longeveron Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$20M
5Y Perf.-98.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LGVN vs DBVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$1721.78T
5Y Perf.-62.4%
LGVN vs DBVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | LGVN | DBVT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $20M | $1721.78T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $-168M |
| Gross Margin | 43.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -19.4% | — |
| Total Debt | $824K | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $194M |
LGVN vs DBVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LGVN
DBVT
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Longeveron Inc. (LGVN) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 37.6 | -62.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGVN vs DBVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: DBVT leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Longeveron Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LGVN
Longeveron Inc.
The Income Pick
LGVN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.95
- Rev growth -49.9%, EPS growth -20.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 14.5%, current ratio 1.33x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Long-Run Compounder
DBVT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -86.8% 10Y total return vs LGVN's -98.8%
- 0.3% margin vs LGVN's -18.9%
- +114.1% vs LGVN's -40.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LGVN | -49.9% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | DBVT | 0.3% margin vs LGVN's -18.9% |
| Stability / Safety | LGVN | Beta 0.95 vs DBVT's 1.26 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | DBVT | +114.1% vs LGVN's -40.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | DBVT | -89.0% ROA vs LGVN's -143.2% |
LGVN vs DBVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLDBVTLAGGINGLGVN
LGVNLongeveron Inc.
1leads
DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LGVNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
DBVT1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
DBVT2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
DBVT6/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
DBVT5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
LGVN1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGVN and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | LGVNLongeveron Inc. | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | -$168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.7% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.9% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.9% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -39.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +91.5% |
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
DBVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LGVNLongeveron Inc. | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $1721.78T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $1721.78T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.68x | -0.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 16.99x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.71x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
DBVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DBVT leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DBVT delivers a -130.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-130 in annual profit, vs $-200 for LGVN. DBVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LGVN's 0.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DBVT scores 4/9 vs LGVN's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | LGVNLongeveron Inc. | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -199.8% | -130.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -143.2% | -89.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -159.8% | -145.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $824,000 | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x |
DBVT leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DBVT five years ago would be worth $3,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $161 for LGVN. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +114.1% total return vs LGVN's -40.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.4% vs LGVN's -69.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LGVNLongeveron Inc. | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.4% | +5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.1% | +114.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | +20.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -66.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -86.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -69.8% | +6.4% |
DBVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LGVN and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LGVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DBVT currently trades 76.8% from its 52-week high vs LGVN's 48.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LGVNLongeveron Inc. | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.80 | $26.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.47 | $7.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.6% | +76.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.4 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.8M | 253K |
Evenly matched — LGVN and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
LGVN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | LGVNLongeveron Inc. | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LGVN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
DBVT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LGVN leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Best OverallDBV Technologies S.A. (DBVT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
LGVN vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGVN or DBVT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LGVN or DBVT?
Over the past 5 years, DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) delivered a total return of -66. 6%, compared to -98. 4% for Longeveron Inc. (LGVN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DBVT returned -86. 8% versus LGVN's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LGVN or DBVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Longeveron Inc.
(LGVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 32% more volatile than LGVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 15% for Longeveron Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LGVN or DBVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Longeveron Inc.
grew EPS -20. 6% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LGVN or DBVT?
DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1893. 6% for Longeveron Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DBVT leads at 0. 0% versus -1942. 2% for LGVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LGVN leads at 67. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LGVN or DBVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LGVN or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Longeveron Inc.
(LGVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LGVN: -98. 8%, DBVT: -86. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LGVN and DBVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.