Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LGVN vs DBVT vs IQV vs NVAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
LGVN vs DBVT vs IQV vs NVAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $20M | $1712.35T | $30.32B | $1.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $0.00 | $16.63B | $596M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $-168M | $1.39B | $-88M |
| Gross Margin | 43.7% | — | 26.1% | 84.6% |
| Operating Margin | -19.4% | — | 13.9% | -11.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.1x | 3.6x |
| Total Debt | $824K | $22M | $16.17B | $249M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $194M | $1.98B | $241M |
LGVN vs DBVT vs IQV vs NVAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Longeveron Inc. (LGVN) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 37.4 | -62.6% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
| Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) | 100 | 4.0 | -96.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGVN vs DBVT vs IQV vs NVAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGVN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.95
- Beta 0.95 vs NVAX's 2.11
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 3.67x
- Beta 1.26, current ratio 3.67x
- +110.4% vs LGVN's -42.8%
IQV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 166.5% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -87.0%
- 8.3% margin vs LGVN's -18.9%
- 4.7% ROA vs LGVN's -143.2%, ROIC 8.7% vs -5.9%
NVAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 64.7%, EPS growth 306.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
- 64.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (3.6x vs 14.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.6x vs 14.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs LGVN's -18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs NVAX's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs LGVN's -42.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs LGVN's -143.2%, ROIC 8.7% vs -5.9% |
LGVN vs DBVT vs IQV vs NVAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LGVN vs DBVT vs IQV vs NVAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IQV leads in 3 of 6 categories
LGVN leads 0 • DBVT leads 0 • NVAX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LGVN's -18.9%. On growth, IQV holds the edge at +8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $0 | $16.6B | $596M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | -$112M | $3.5B | -$47M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | -$168M | $1.4B | -$88M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | -$151M | $2.7B | -$96M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.7% | — | +26.1% | +84.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.4% | — | +13.9% | -11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.9% | — | +8.3% | -14.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.9% | — | +16.1% | -16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -39.5% | — | +8.4% | -79.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +91.5% | +15.0% | -102.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DBVT and NVAX each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.6x trailing earnings, NVAX trades at a 84% valuation discount to IQV's 22.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVAX's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IQV's 13.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $1712.35T | $30.3B | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $1712.35T | $44.5B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.66x | -0.76x | 22.79x | 3.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.06x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.56x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 12.97x | 2.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 16.56x | — | 1.86x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.64x | 0.66x | 4.67x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 14.78x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-200 for LGVN. DBVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVAX scores 5/9 vs LGVN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -199.8% | -130.2% | +22.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -143.2% | -89.0% | +4.7% | -7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.9% | — | +8.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -159.8% | -145.7% | +11.0% | +100.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.13x | 2.44x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$172M | $14.2B | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $194M | $2.0B | $241M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $824,000 | $22M | $16.2B | $249M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x | 3.10x | -5.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — IQV and NVAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IQV five years ago would be worth $7,621 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $152 for LGVN. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs LGVN's -42.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVAX at 7.4% vs LGVN's -70.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.6% | +4.9% | -20.7% | +29.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.8% | +110.4% | +16.5% | +55.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | +19.7% | -5.9% | +23.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | -69.1% | -23.8% | -94.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -87.0% | +166.5% | -90.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.0% | +6.2% | -2.0% | +7.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LGVN and NVAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LGVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVAX's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVAX currently trades 77.1% from its 52-week high vs LGVN's 47.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.26x | 1.33x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.80 | $26.18 | $247.05 | $11.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.47 | $7.53 | $134.65 | $5.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.3% | +76.3% | +72.3% | +77.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.1 | 48.1 | 58.5 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.7M | 252K | 1.6M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", NVAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 26.3% for IQV (target: $226).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $225.63 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 44 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% | +0.3% |
IQV leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
LGVN vs DBVT vs IQV vs NVAX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGVN or DBVT or IQV or NVAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the stronger pick with 64. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 9% for Longeveron Inc. (LGVN). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LGVN or DBVT or IQV or NVAX?
On trailing P/E, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the cheapest at 3. 6x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 22. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LGVN or DBVT or IQV or NVAX?
Over the past 5 years, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) delivered a total return of -23. 8%, compared to -98. 5% for Longeveron Inc. (LGVN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IQV returned +166. 5% versus LGVN's -98. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LGVN or DBVT or IQV or NVAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Longeveron Inc.
(LGVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Novavax, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning NVAX is approximately 121% more volatile than LGVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LGVN or DBVT or IQV or NVAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is pulling ahead at 64. 7% versus -49. 9% for Longeveron Inc. (LGVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novavax, Inc. grew EPS 306. 5% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IQV leads at 4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LGVN or DBVT or IQV or NVAX?
Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -1893. 6% for Longeveron Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus -1942. 2% for LGVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVAX leads at 93. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LGVN or DBVT or IQV or NVAX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131.
8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — LGVN or DBVT or IQV or NVAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LGVN or DBVT or IQV or NVAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Longeveron Inc.
(LGVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95)). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LGVN: -98. 9%, NVAX: -90. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LGVN and DBVT and IQV and NVAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LGVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.