Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LIF vs GSAT vs TRAK vs CLAR vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Software - Application
Leisure
Internet Content & Information
LIF vs GSAT vs TRAK vs CLAR vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Telecommunications Services | Software - Application | Leisure | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $3.49B | $10.33B | $185M | $111M | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $489M | $262M | $24M | $254M | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $151M | $-50M | $7M | $-45M | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 77.8% | 57.2% | 85.0% | 29.2% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.8% | 1.4% | 30.2% | -7.9% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | 34.1x | — | 27.8x | — | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $310M | $542M | $510K | $12M | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $494M | $391M | $29M | $37M | $30.71B |
LIF vs GSAT vs TRAK vs CLAR vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life360, Inc. (LIF) | 100 | 135.9 | +35.9% |
| Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) | 100 | 485.0 | +385.0% |
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | 100 | 66.4 | -33.6% |
| Clarus Corporation (CLAR) | 100 | 42.9 | -57.1% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 218.5 | +118.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LIF vs GSAT vs TRAK vs CLAR vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LIF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 31.8%, EPS growth 29.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.9%
- 31.8% revenue growth vs CLAR's -4.6%
GSAT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +305.2% vs TRAK's -52.5%
TRAK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 6.09x
- PEG 0.81 vs GOOGL's 0.99
- Beta 1.15, yield 0.9%, current ratio 6.09x
- Lower P/E (27.8x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.81 vs 0.99
CLAR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.34, yield 3.5%
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
GOOGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs GSAT's 201.8%
- 37.9% margin vs GSAT's -19.0%
- 27.4% ROA vs CLAR's -21.6%, ROIC 25.1% vs -8.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.8% revenue growth vs CLAR's -4.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.8x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.81 vs 0.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs GSAT's -19.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs LIF's 2.25, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +305.2% vs TRAK's -52.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs CLAR's -21.6%, ROIC 25.1% vs -8.2% |
LIF vs GSAT vs TRAK vs CLAR vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LIF vs GSAT vs TRAK vs CLAR vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRAK leads in 1 of 6 categories
GOOGL leads 1 • GSAT leads 1 • LIF leads 0 • CLAR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LIF and GOOGL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 17979.8x TRAK's $24M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSAT's -19.0%. On growth, LIF holds the edge at +26.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $489M | $262M | $24M | $254M | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $33M | $93M | $8M | -$11M | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $151M | -$50M | $7M | -$45M | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $81M | $151M | $7M | -$12M | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.8% | +57.2% | +85.0% | +29.2% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +1.4% | +30.2% | -7.9% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.8% | -19.0% | +30.9% | -17.6% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +57.6% | +29.1% | -4.9% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.4% | +2.1% | +6.7% | +2.5% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | -121.9% | +13.2% | +35.7% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
TRAK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.9x trailing earnings, LIF trades at a 32% valuation discount to GOOGL's 36.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRAK offers better value at 0.85x vs GOOGL's 1.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $10.3B | $185M | $111M | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $10.5B | $157M | $87M | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.86x | -138.10x | 29.01x | -2.39x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.14x | — | 27.82x | — | 29.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.85x | — | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 101.80x | 119.09x | 20.98x | — | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.14x | 41.28x | 8.18x | 0.44x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.84x | 28.58x | 3.93x | 0.56x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.22x | 57.85x | 22.01x | — | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-21 for CLAR. TRAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GSAT's 1.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRAK scores 7/9 vs CLAR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +35.9% | -13.7% | +14.6% | -21.2% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.4% | -2.3% | +12.9% | -21.6% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | -0.1% | +21.4% | -8.2% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | -0.1% | +12.9% | -17.9% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 1.51x | 0.01x | 0.06x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$184M | $151M | -$28M | -$24M | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $494M | $391M | $29M | $37M | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $310M | $542M | $509,973 | $12M | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.07x | 165.50x | — | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GSAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GSAT five years ago would be worth $49,382 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,719 for CLAR. Over the past 12 months, GSAT leads with a +305.2% total return vs TRAK's -52.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GSAT at 80.1% vs CLAR's -27.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.6% | +27.3% | -14.1% | -13.2% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.9% | +305.2% | -52.5% | -12.3% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +484.1% | +63.0% | -62.4% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +393.8% | +110.3% | -82.8% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +201.8% | +14.5% | -13.5% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +80.1% | +17.7% | -27.8% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRAK and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRAK is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LIF's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs LIF's 39.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.25x | 2.08x | 1.15x | 1.34x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $112.54 | $82.85 | $23.72 | $4.03 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $37.01 | $17.24 | $6.94 | $2.58 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.1% | +98.3% | +42.8% | +71.7% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 66.4 | 63.8 | 58.5 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.5M | 161K | 217K | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GSAT and CLAR and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LIF as "Buy", GSAT as "Hold", TRAK as "Buy", CLAR as "Hold", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 136.3% upside for TRAK (target: $24) vs -19.0% for GSAT (target: $66). For income investors, CLAR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.46% vs GSAT's 0.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $74.05 | $66.00 | $24.00 | $5.00 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 5 | 1 | 11 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | +0.9% | +3.5% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.08 | $0.09 | $0.10 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | +0.0% | +0.9% |
TRAK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). GOOGL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
LIF vs GSAT vs TRAK vs CLAR vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIF or GSAT or TRAK or CLAR or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Life360, Inc.
(LIF) is the stronger pick with 31. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 6% for Clarus Corporation (CLAR). Life360, Inc. (LIF) offers the better valuation at 24. 9x trailing P/E (34. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Life360, Inc. (LIF) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LIF or GSAT or TRAK or CLAR or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Life360, Inc.
(LIF) is the cheapest at 24. 9x versus Alphabet Inc. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, ReposiTrak, Inc. is actually cheaper at 27. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ReposiTrak, Inc. wins at 0. 81x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LIF or GSAT or TRAK or CLAR or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) delivered a total return of +393. 8%, compared to -82. 8% for Clarus Corporation (CLAR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus CLAR's -13. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LIF or GSAT or TRAK or CLAR or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Life360, Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning LIF is approximately 95% more volatile than TRAK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 151% for Globalstar, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LIF or GSAT or TRAK or CLAR or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Life360, Inc.
(LIF) is pulling ahead at 31. 8% versus -4. 6% for Clarus Corporation (CLAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Life360, Inc. grew EPS 29. 0% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Globalstar, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIF leads at 28. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LIF or GSAT or TRAK or CLAR or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -25. 2% for Globalstar, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -8. 2% for CLAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRAK leads at 83. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LIF or GSAT or TRAK or CLAR or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) trades at 27. 8x forward P/E versus 34. 1x for Life360, Inc. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRAK: 136. 3% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LIF or GSAT or TRAK or CLAR or GOOGL?
In this comparison, CLAR (3.
5% yield), TRAK (0. 9% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield), GSAT (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. LIF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LIF or GSAT or TRAK or CLAR or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). Life360, Inc. (LIF) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LIF and GSAT and TRAK and CLAR and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (LIF (Technology) and GSAT (Communication Services) and TRAK (Technology) and CLAR (Consumer Cyclical) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LIF is a small-cap high-growth stock; GSAT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TRAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLAR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. TRAK, CLAR pay a dividend while LIF, GSAT, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.