Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LIF vs TRAK vs GSAT vs VRNT vs SPOK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Telecommunications Services
Software - Infrastructure
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
LIF vs TRAK vs GSAT vs VRNT vs SPOK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Telecommunications Services | Software - Infrastructure | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $3.50B | $186M | $10.56B | $1.24B | $226M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $489M | $24M | $283M | $894M | $103M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $151M | $7M | $-14M | $61M | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 77.8% | 85.0% | 40.9% | 69.9% | 91.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.8% | 30.2% | 8.6% | 8.6% | 13.2% |
| Forward P/E | 34.2x | 28.0x | — | 7.0x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $310M | $510K | $546M | $448M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $494M | $29M | $447M | $216M | $25M |
LIF vs TRAK vs GSAT vs VRNT vs SPOK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life360, Inc. (LIF) | 100 | 136.0 | +36.0% |
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | 100 | 66.9 | -33.1% |
| Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) | 100 | 488.6 | +388.6% |
| Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) | 100 | 63.0 | -37.0% |
| Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) | 100 | 73.5 | -26.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LIF vs TRAK vs GSAT vs VRNT vs SPOK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LIF has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 31.8%, EPS growth 29.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.9%
- 31.8% revenue growth vs VRNT's -0.1%
- 20.4% ROA vs GSAT's -0.6%, ROIC 5.0% vs 2.3%
TRAK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 6.09x
- 30.9% margin vs GSAT's -5.0%
GSAT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 204.0% 10Y total return vs TRAK's 15.4%
- +306.6% vs TRAK's -53.1%
VRNT is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.36 vs TRAK's 0.82
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 16.5x)
SPOK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 11.9%
- Beta 0.40, yield 11.9%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.40 vs LIF's 2.18, lower leverage
- 11.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs VRNT's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.8% revenue growth vs VRNT's -0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 16.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs GSAT's -5.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs LIF's 2.18, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs VRNT's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +306.6% vs TRAK's -53.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.4% ROA vs GSAT's -0.6%, ROIC 5.0% vs 2.3% |
LIF vs TRAK vs GSAT vs VRNT vs SPOK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LIF vs TRAK vs GSAT vs VRNT vs SPOK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRAK leads in 2 of 6 categories
VRNT leads 1 • GSAT leads 1 • SPOK leads 1 • LIF leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRAK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRNT is the larger business by revenue, generating $894M annually — 38.0x TRAK's $24M. TRAK is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSAT's -5.0%. On growth, LIF holds the edge at +26.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $489M | $24M | $283M | $894M | $103M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $33M | $8M | $108M | $127M | $17M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $151M | $7M | -$14M | $61M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $81M | $7M | $45M | $118M | $26M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.8% | +85.0% | +40.9% | +69.9% | +91.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +30.2% | +8.6% | +8.6% | +13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.8% | +30.9% | -5.0% | +6.9% | +10.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +29.1% | +15.8% | +13.2% | +24.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.4% | +6.7% | +16.7% | -1.0% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | +13.2% | 0.0% | -5.1% | -64.0% |
Valuation Metrics
VRNT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, SPOK trades at a 50% valuation discount to TRAK's 29.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRAK offers better value at 0.85x vs VRNT's 1.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $186M | $10.6B | $1.2B | $226M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $158M | $10.7B | $1.5B | $207M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.89x | 29.23x | -547.27x | 19.72x | 14.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.22x | 28.03x | — | 7.00x | 16.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.85x | — | 1.02x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 101.90x | 21.16x | 104.40x | 9.46x | 8.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.14x | 8.24x | 38.67x | 1.37x | 1.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.84x | 3.95x | 29.25x | 0.97x | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.26x | 22.17x | 137.46x | 8.75x | 8.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIF delivers a 35.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-4 for GSAT. TRAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GSAT's 1.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRAK scores 7/9 vs GSAT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +35.9% | +14.6% | -3.9% | +4.6% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.4% | +12.9% | -0.6% | +2.8% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +21.4% | +2.3% | +5.3% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +12.9% | +0.8% | +5.9% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.01x | 1.54x | 0.34x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$184M | -$28M | $99M | $233M | -$18M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $494M | $29M | $447M | $216M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $310M | $509,973 | $546M | $448M | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 165.50x | — | 8.24x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GSAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GSAT five years ago would be worth $50,208 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,416 for VRNT. Over the past 12 months, GSAT leads with a +306.6% total return vs TRAK's -53.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GSAT at 80.5% vs VRNT's -15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.6% | -13.4% | +28.3% | — | -13.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.5% | -53.1% | +306.6% | +13.8% | -26.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +64.2% | +488.5% | -39.3% | +13.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +106.8% | +402.1% | -55.8% | +61.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +15.4% | +204.0% | -37.1% | +13.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +18.0% | +80.5% | -15.3% | +4.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GSAT and SPOK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPOK is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LIF's 2.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GSAT currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs LIF's 39.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.18x | 1.09x | 2.04x | 1.25x | 0.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $112.54 | $23.72 | $82.85 | $22.84 | $19.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $37.01 | $6.94 | $17.24 | $16.23 | $9.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.1% | +43.1% | +99.1% | +89.8% | +56.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 67.5 | 64.2 | 68.4 | 42.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 154K | 1.5M | 0 | 170K |
Analyst Outlook
SPOK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LIF as "Buy", TRAK as "Buy", GSAT as "Hold", VRNT as "Hold", SPOK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 134.6% upside for TRAK (target: $24) vs -19.6% for GSAT (target: $66). For income investors, SPOK offers the higher dividend yield at 11.88% vs GSAT's 0.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $74.05 | $24.00 | $66.00 | $32.57 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +0.1% | +1.6% | +11.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.09 | $0.08 | $0.32 | $1.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% | 0.0% | +5.8% | +1.3% |
TRAK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VRNT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LIF vs TRAK vs GSAT vs VRNT vs SPOK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIF or TRAK or GSAT or VRNT or SPOK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Life360, Inc.
(LIF) is the stronger pick with 31. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 1% for Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT). Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Life360, Inc. (LIF) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LIF or TRAK or GSAT or VRNT or SPOK?
On trailing P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus ReposiTrak, Inc. at 29. 2x. On forward P/E, Verint Systems Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Verint Systems Inc. wins at 0. 36x versus ReposiTrak, Inc. 's 0. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LIF or TRAK or GSAT or VRNT or SPOK?
Over the past 5 years, Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) delivered a total return of +402. 1%, compared to -55. 8% for Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GSAT returned +204. 0% versus VRNT's -37. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LIF or TRAK or GSAT or VRNT or SPOK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Life360, Inc. 's 2. 18β — meaning LIF is approximately 440% more volatile than SPOK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 154% for Globalstar, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LIF or TRAK or GSAT or VRNT or SPOK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Life360, Inc.
(LIF) is pulling ahead at 31. 8% versus -0. 1% for Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Life360, Inc. grew EPS 29. 0% year-over-year, compared to 2. 7% for Spok Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIF leads at 28. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LIF or TRAK or GSAT or VRNT or SPOK?
ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -3. 2% for Globalstar, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRAK leads at 27. 5% versus 3. 8% for LIF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRAK leads at 83. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LIF or TRAK or GSAT or VRNT or SPOK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus ReposiTrak, Inc. 's 0. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 34. 2x for Life360, Inc. — 27. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRAK: 134. 6% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LIF or TRAK or GSAT or VRNT or SPOK?
In this comparison, SPOK (11.
9% yield), VRNT (1. 6% yield), TRAK (0. 8% yield), GSAT (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. LIF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LIF or TRAK or GSAT or VRNT or SPOK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40), 11. 9% yield). Life360, Inc. (LIF) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LIF and TRAK and GSAT and VRNT and SPOK?
These companies operate in different sectors (LIF (Technology) and TRAK (Technology) and GSAT (Communication Services) and VRNT (Technology) and SPOK (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LIF is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GSAT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VRNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock. TRAK, VRNT, SPOK pay a dividend while LIF, GSAT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Gross Margin > 24%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.