Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LIN vs CAT vs DOV vs DE vs ITW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
LIN vs CAT vs DOV vs DE vs ITW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Agricultural - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $228.85B | $416.75B | $29.78B | $157.32B | $73.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $34.66B | $70.75B | $8.28B | $45.88B | $16.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7.13B | $9.42B | $1.10B | $4.08B | $3.13B |
| Gross Margin | 46.0% | 32.5% | 39.5% | 34.7% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 28.8% | 16.6% | 16.7% | 17.0% | 26.4% |
| Forward P/E | 27.7x | 38.8x | 20.7x | 32.5x | 22.7x |
| Total Debt | $26.99B | $43.33B | $3.78B | $63.94B | $8.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.06B | $9.98B | $1.68B | $8.28B | $851M |
LIN vs CAT vs DOV vs DE vs ITW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 745.6 | +645.6% |
| Dover Corporation (DOV) | 100 | 227.2 | +127.2% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 381.5 | +281.5% |
| Illinois Tool Works… (ITW) | 100 | 148.2 | +48.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LIN vs CAT vs DOV vs DE vs ITW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LIN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 7.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 67.9%, current ratio 0.88x
- PEG 1.09 vs ITW's 2.36
- 20.6% margin vs DE's 8.9%
CAT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs DE's 6.7%
- +181.5% vs ITW's +9.0%
DOV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 4.5% revenue growth vs DE's -2.2%
- Lower P/E (20.7x vs 22.7x), PEG 1.88 vs 2.36
DE is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.56, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.31x
ITW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 2.4%
- 2.4% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs DOV's 0.9%
- 19.4% ROA vs DE's 3.9%, ROIC 29.0% vs 7.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.5% revenue growth vs DE's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.7x vs 22.7x), PEG 1.88 vs 2.36 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs DE's 8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs CAT's 1.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs DOV's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +181.5% vs ITW's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.4% ROA vs DE's 3.9%, ROIC 29.0% vs 7.7% |
LIN vs CAT vs DOV vs DE vs ITW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LIN vs CAT vs DOV vs DE vs ITW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOV leads in 1 of 6 categories
ITW leads 1 • CAT leads 1 • LIN leads 0 • DE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LIN and CAT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 8.5x DOV's $8.3B. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DE's 8.9%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $34.7B | $70.8B | $8.3B | $45.9B | $16.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12.1B | $14.0B | $1.7B | $9.5B | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.1B | $9.4B | $1.1B | $4.1B | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.1B | $11.4B | $1.1B | $5.5B | $2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.0% | +32.5% | +39.5% | +34.7% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +16.6% | +16.7% | +17.0% | +26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +13.3% | +13.3% | +8.9% | +19.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +16.2% | +13.7% | +12.0% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.2% | +22.2% | +10.1% | +16.3% | +4.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.4% | +30.2% | +4.8% | -24.1% | +11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
DOV leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.4x trailing earnings, ITW trades at a 49% valuation discount to CAT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LIN offers better value at 1.33x vs DOV's 2.54x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $228.8B | $416.8B | $29.8B | $157.3B | $73.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $250.8B | $450.1B | $31.9B | $213.0B | $81.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.85x | 47.57x | 27.89x | 31.37x | 24.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.67x | 38.79x | 20.73x | 32.53x | 22.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.33x | 1.69x | 2.54x | 1.92x | 2.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.75x | 33.41x | 18.19x | 20.01x | 17.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.73x | 6.17x | 3.68x | 3.52x | 4.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.82x | 19.71x | 4.12x | 6.06x | 23.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 44.97x | 40.56x | 26.64x | 48.69x | 27.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITW leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITW delivers a 97.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $97 in annual profit, vs $15 for DOV. DOV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITW's 2.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs ITW's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.8% | +47.5% | +14.7% | +15.5% | +97.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.3% | +10.0% | +8.2% | +3.9% | +19.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.3% | +15.9% | +11.6% | +7.7% | +29.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.0% | +19.1% | +12.9% | +11.4% | +38.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 2.03x | 0.51x | 2.46x | 2.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21.9B | $33.4B | $2.1B | $55.7B | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.1B | $10.0B | $1.7B | $8.3B | $851M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27.0B | $43.3B | $3.8B | $63.9B | $9.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 34.52x | 9.22x | 13.34x | 2.74x | 14.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $38,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,886 for ITW. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +181.5% total return vs ITW's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 62.0% vs ITW's 6.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.5% | +50.2% | +13.1% | +24.7% | +3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.2% | +181.5% | +30.1% | +24.2% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.7% | +324.9% | +57.7% | +57.4% | +19.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.9% | +282.5% | +51.1% | +54.1% | +18.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +375.2% | +1227.6% | +370.8% | +671.0% | +189.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.8% | +62.0% | +16.4% | +16.3% | +6.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIN and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs ITW's 84.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.24x | 1.54x | 1.03x | 0.56x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $521.28 | $931.35 | $237.54 | $674.19 | $303.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $387.78 | $318.11 | $158.97 | $433.00 | $236.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.7% | +96.2% | +93.0% | +86.1% | +84.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.7 | 76.2 | 58.6 | 54.0 | 45.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 2.4M | 1.0M | 1.2M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DOV and ITW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LIN as "Buy", CAT as "Buy", DOV as "Buy", DE as "Hold", ITW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.3% upside for DE (target: $681) vs -7.9% for CAT (target: $825). For income investors, ITW offers the higher dividend yield at 2.39% vs CAT's 0.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $539.71 | $824.80 | $237.08 | $680.54 | $273.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 53 | 28 | 46 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +0.7% | +0.9% | +1.1% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 8 | 33 | 8 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.00 | $5.86 | $2.05 | $6.33 | $6.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +1.2% | +1.8% | +0.7% | +2.0% |
DOV leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). ITW leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
LIN vs CAT vs DOV vs DE vs ITW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIN or CAT or DOV or DE or ITW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dover Corporation (DOV) is the stronger pick with 4.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Deere & Company (DE). Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) offers the better valuation at 24. 4x trailing P/E (22. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Linde plc (LIN) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LIN or CAT or DOV or DE or ITW?
On trailing P/E, Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the cheapest at 24. 4x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Dover Corporation is actually cheaper at 20. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Linde plc wins at 1. 09x versus Illinois Tool Works Inc. 's 2. 36x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LIN or CAT or DOV or DE or ITW?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +282. 5%, compared to +18. 9% for Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1228% versus ITW's +189. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LIN or CAT or DOV or DE or ITW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning CAT is approximately 541% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dover Corporation (DOV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 3% for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LIN or CAT or DOV or DE or ITW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dover Corporation (DOV) is pulling ahead at 4.
5% versus -2. 2% for Deere & Company (DE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Linde plc grew EPS 7. 1% year-over-year, compared to -59. 3% for Dover Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LIN or CAT or DOV or DE or ITW?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus 11. 3% for Deere & Company — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus 16. 6% for CAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ITW leads at 44. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LIN or CAT or DOV or DE or ITW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Linde plc (LIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 09x versus Illinois Tool Works Inc. 's 2. 36x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Dover Corporation (DOV) trades at 20. 7x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for Caterpillar Inc. — 18. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DE: 17. 3% to $680. 54.
08Which pays a better dividend — LIN or CAT or DOV or DE or ITW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 0. 7% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT).
09Is LIN or CAT or DOV or DE or ITW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +375. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +375. 2%, DOV: +370. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LIN and CAT and DOV and DE and ITW?
These companies operate in different sectors (LIN (Basic Materials) and CAT (Industrials) and DOV (Industrials) and DE (Industrials) and ITW (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.