Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LKQ vs ORLY vs AZO vs GPC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
Specialty Retail
LKQ vs ORLY vs AZO vs GPC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $7.33B | $79.13B | $58.96B | $14.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.92B | $18.21B | $19.29B | $24.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $517M | $2.60B | $2.46B | $60M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 51.6% | 52.1% | 36.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 19.6% | 18.4% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 29.2x | 23.9x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $5.06B | $8.49B | $12.29B | $8.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $319M | $194M | $272M | $477M |
LKQ vs ORLY vs AZO vs GPC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LKQ Corporation (LKQ) | 100 | 104.6 | +4.6% |
| O'Reilly Automotive… (ORLY) | 100 | 340.0 | +240.0% |
| AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) | 100 | 309.7 | +209.7% |
| Genuine Parts Compa… (GPC) | 100 | 126.2 | +26.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LKQ vs ORLY vs AZO vs GPC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LKQ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 77.1%, current ratio 1.67x
- Beta 0.90, yield 4.2%, current ratio 1.67x
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 13.7x)
- 4.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GPC's 3.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ORLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 9.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.3%
- 431.0% 10Y total return vs AZO's 353.6%
- 6.4% revenue growth vs LKQ's -3.1%
- 14.3% margin vs GPC's 0.2%
AZO is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.59 vs LKQ's 4.01
GPC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 3.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs LKQ's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 13.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.3% margin vs GPC's 0.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs LKQ's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GPC's 3.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.9% vs LKQ's -24.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.9% ROA vs GPC's 0.3%, ROIC 37.2% vs 8.3% |
LKQ vs ORLY vs AZO vs GPC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LKQ vs ORLY vs AZO vs GPC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ORLY leads in 4 of 6 categories
LKQ leads 1 • AZO leads 0 • GPC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORLY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPC is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.7B annually — 1.8x LKQ's $13.9B. ORLY is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPC's 0.2%. On growth, ORLY holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.9B | $18.2B | $19.3B | $24.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $4.1B | $4.2B | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $517M | $2.6B | $2.5B | $60M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $808M | $1.9B | $1.9B | $548M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +51.6% | +52.1% | +36.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +19.6% | +18.4% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +14.3% | +12.8% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +10.5% | +9.6% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.2% | +10.2% | +8.2% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -52.3% | +15.6% | -4.6% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
LKQ leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, LKQ trades at a 95% valuation discount to GPC's 223.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AZO offers better value at 1.63x vs LKQ's 5.15x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.3B | $79.1B | $59.0B | $14.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.1B | $87.4B | $71.0B | $22.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.22x | 31.85x | 24.54x | 223.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.51x | 29.18x | 23.89x | 13.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.15x | 2.55x | 1.63x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.08x | 22.01x | 16.81x | 12.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 4.45x | 3.11x | 0.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | — | — | 3.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.65x | 49.67x | 32.94x | 34.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ORLY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LKQ delivers a 7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $1 for GPC. LKQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPC's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ORLY scores 6/9 vs GPC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | — | — | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +15.9% | +13.0% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +37.2% | +34.0% | +8.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +48.2% | +39.5% | +11.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.77x | — | — | 1.86x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.7B | $8.3B | $12.0B | $7.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $319M | $194M | $272M | $477M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.1B | $8.5B | $12.3B | $8.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.50x | 14.88x | 7.49x | 1.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ORLY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORLY five years ago would be worth $25,228 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,792 for LKQ. Over the past 12 months, ORLY leads with a +2.9% total return vs LKQ's -24.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORLY at 14.4% vs LKQ's -17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.4% | +4.7% | +7.6% | -14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.1% | +2.9% | -5.1% | -5.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.6% | +49.9% | +31.2% | -32.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | +152.3% | +135.9% | -6.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.7% | +431.0% | +353.6% | +43.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.4% | +14.4% | +9.5% | -12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ORLY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ORLY is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LKQ's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ORLY currently trades 87.0% from its 52-week high vs LKQ's 67.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.14x | 0.22x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.67 | $108.72 | $4388.11 | $151.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.23 | $86.77 | $3210.72 | $96.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.3% | +87.0% | +81.0% | +69.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.2 | 53.4 | 50.1 | 45.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 5.2M | 172K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LKQ and GPC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LKQ as "Buy", ORLY as "Buy", AZO as "Buy", GPC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 34.7% upside for LKQ (target: $39) vs 17.1% for ORLY (target: $111). For income investors, LKQ offers the higher dividend yield at 4.22% vs GPC's 3.85%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.67 | $110.80 | $4235.71 | $141.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 47 | 45 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | — | — | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — | — | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.21 | — | — | $4.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +2.6% | +2.7% | 0.0% |
ORLY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LKQ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LKQ vs ORLY vs AZO vs GPC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LKQ or ORLY or AZO or GPC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for LKQ Corporation (LKQ). LKQ Corporation (LKQ) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LKQ Corporation (LKQ) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LKQ or ORLY or AZO or GPC?
On trailing P/E, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus Genuine Parts Company at 223. 9x. On forward P/E, LKQ Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: AutoZone, Inc. wins at 1. 59x versus LKQ Corporation's 4. 01x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LKQ or ORLY or AZO or GPC?
Over the past 5 years, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) delivered a total return of +152. 3%, compared to -32. 1% for LKQ Corporation (LKQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORLY returned +431. 0% versus LKQ's +3. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LKQ or ORLY or AZO or GPC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus LKQ Corporation's 0. 90β — meaning LKQ is approximately 528% more volatile than ORLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 186% for Genuine Parts Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LKQ or ORLY or AZO or GPC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -3. 1% for LKQ Corporation (LKQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. grew EPS 9. 6% year-over-year, compared to -92. 7% for Genuine Parts Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, ORLY leads at 7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LKQ or ORLY or AZO or GPC?
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 3% net margin versus 0. 3% for Genuine Parts Company — meaning it keeps 14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORLY leads at 19. 5% versus 5. 0% for GPC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AZO leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LKQ or ORLY or AZO or GPC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 59x versus LKQ Corporation's 4. 01x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 29. 2x for O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. — 19. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LKQ: 34. 7% to $38. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — LKQ or ORLY or AZO or GPC?
In this comparison, LKQ (4.
2% yield), GPC (3. 8% yield) pay a dividend. ORLY, AZO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LKQ or ORLY or AZO or GPC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), +431. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ORLY: +431. 0%, LKQ: +3. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LKQ and ORLY and AZO and GPC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LKQ is a small-cap deep-value stock; ORLY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AZO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GPC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. LKQ, GPC pay a dividend while ORLY, AZO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.