Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LMB vs KFRC vs KELYA vs CSTE vs MAN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LMB
Limbach Holdings, Inc.

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$866M
5Y Perf.+2501.1%
KFRC
Kforce Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$790M
5Y Perf.+43.1%
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$349M
5Y Perf.-35.3%
CSTE
Caesarstone Ltd.

Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$48M
5Y Perf.-87.6%
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.41B
5Y Perf.-56.0%

LMB vs KFRC vs KELYA vs CSTE vs MAN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LMB logoLMB
KFRC logoKFRC
KELYA logoKELYA
CSTE logoCSTE
MAN logoMAN
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionStaffing & Employment ServicesStaffing & Employment ServicesConstructionStaffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$866M$790M$349M$48M$1.41B
Revenue (TTM)$653M$1.33B$3.09B$397M$17.96B
Net Income (TTM)$33M$35M$-266M$-137M$-13M
Gross Margin25.1%27.2%26.3%18.4%16.7%
Operating Margin6.5%3.8%-2.8%-14.8%0.8%
Forward P/E16.5x18.0x11.0x8.3x
Total Debt$56M$70M$159M$109M$2.39B
Cash & Equiv.$11M$2M$33M$871M

LMB vs KFRC vs KELYA vs CSTE vs MANLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LMB
KFRC
KELYA
CSTE
MAN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Limbach Holdings, I… (LMB)1002601.1+2501.1%
Kforce Inc. (KFRC)100143.1+43.1%
Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA)10064.7-35.3%
Caesarstone Ltd. (CSTE)10012.4-87.6%
ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN)10044.0-56.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LMB vs KFRC vs KELYA vs CSTE vs MAN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KFRC leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. Limbach Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. MAN also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LMB
Limbach Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

LMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 24.7%, EPS growth 56.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
  • 6.5% 10Y total return vs KFRC's 195.5%
  • 24.7% revenue growth vs CSTE's -10.4%
  • 5.1% margin vs CSTE's -34.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
KFRC
Kforce Inc.
The Income Pick

KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
  • Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
  • Beta 0.53 vs LMB's 1.40
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.
The Income Angle

KELYA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
CSTE
Caesarstone Ltd.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, CSTE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.
The Value Play

MAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: value and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLMB logoLMB24.7% revenue growth vs CSTE's -10.4%
ValueMAN logoMANBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsLMB logoLMB5.1% margin vs CSTE's -34.6%
Stability / SafetyKFRC logoKFRCBeta 0.53 vs LMB's 1.40
DividendsMAN logoMAN4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)KFRC logoKFRC+18.9% vs CSTE's -39.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KFRC logoKFRC9.2% ROA vs CSTE's -27.9%, ROIC 19.1% vs -12.8%

LMB vs KFRC vs KELYA vs CSTE vs MAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LMBLimbach Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Owner Direct Relationships Segment
75.1%$486M
General Contractor (Construction Manager) Relationships Segment
24.9%$161M
KFRCKforce Inc.
FY 2025
Flex Revenue
98.1%$1.3B
Direct Hire Revenue
1.9%$26M
KELYAKelly Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Science, Engineering & Technology
55.1%$1.2B
Education
44.9%$1.0B
CSTECaesarstone Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

MANManpowerGroup Inc.
FY 2024
StaffingandInterim
87.5%$15.7B
Outcome-BasedSolutionsandConsulting
7.0%$1.3B
PermanentRecruitment
2.7%$492M
Other
2.7%$482M
Franchise
0.1%$14M

LMB vs KFRC vs KELYA vs CSTE vs MAN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLMBLAGGINGCSTE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LMB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 45.2x CSTE's $397M. LMB is the more profitable business, keeping 5.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CSTE's -34.6%. On growth, MAN holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLMB logoLMBLimbach Holdings,…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…CSTE logoCSTECaesarstone Ltd.MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$653M$1.3B$3.1B$397M$18.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$56M$56M-$54M-$44M$236M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$33M$35M-$266M-$137M-$13M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$34M$43M$66M-$46M-$161M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.1%+27.2%+26.3%+18.4%+16.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.5%+3.8%-2.8%-14.8%+0.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.1%+2.6%-8.6%-34.6%-0.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.2%+3.3%+2.1%-11.6%-0.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.3%+0.1%-100.0%-3.5%+7.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-57.6%+2.2%-2.1%-3.2%+36.2%
LMB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.4x trailing earnings, LMB trades at a 16% valuation discount to KFRC's 22.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MAN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KFRC's 15.4x.

MetricLMB logoLMBLimbach Holdings,…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…CSTE logoCSTECaesarstone Ltd.MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
Market CapShares × price$866M$790M$349M$48M$1.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$910M$858M$475M$157M$2.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.44x22.05x-1.34x-0.35x-104.90x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.46x17.96x10.96x8.28x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.45x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.47x15.42x9.02x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.34x0.59x0.08x0.12x0.08x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.59x6.17x0.35x0.34x0.69x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.67x16.88x3.06x
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LMB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-63 for CSTE. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KELYA scores 5/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricLMB logoLMBLimbach Holdings,…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…CSTE logoCSTECaesarstone Ltd.MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.9%+27.2%-24.6%-62.5%-0.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.8%+9.2%-11.3%-27.9%-0.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+18.7%+19.1%-4.0%-12.8%+5.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+22.1%+20.1%-4.3%-15.6%+6.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944521
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.29x0.56x0.16x0.79x1.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$45M$68M$126M$109M$1.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$11M$2M$33M$871M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$56M$70M$159M$109M$2.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense18.39x-12.07x-6.99x1.98x
LMB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LMB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LMB five years ago would be worth $69,475 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,097 for CSTE. Over the past 12 months, KFRC leads with a +18.9% total return vs CSTE's -39.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LMB at 62.9% vs CSTE's -33.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLMB logoLMBLimbach Holdings,…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…CSTE logoCSTECaesarstone Ltd.MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-6.2%+39.2%+13.1%-20.2%+1.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-38.5%+18.9%-12.2%-39.2%-17.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+332.0%-13.8%-34.2%-70.0%-46.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+594.8%-16.8%-58.3%-89.0%-64.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+648.8%+195.5%-33.0%-92.7%-30.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+62.9%-4.8%-13.0%-33.1%-18.8%
LMB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LMB's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs LMB's 48.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLMB logoLMBLimbach Holdings,…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…CSTE logoCSTECaesarstone Ltd.MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.40x0.53x1.01x1.25x1.03x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$154.05$47.48$14.94$2.58$47.34
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$65.08$24.49$7.98$0.56$25.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+48.1%+91.0%+64.9%+53.5%+64.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.365.663.749.047.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded221K305K361K1.3M1.1M
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KFRC and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LMB as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", KELYA as "Buy", MAN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 24.5% for MAN (target: $38). For income investors, MAN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.71% vs KELYA's 3.23%.

MetricLMB logoLMBLimbach Holdings,…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…CSTE logoCSTECaesarstone Ltd.MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$104.00$71.00$15.00$37.86
# AnalystsCovering analysts710529
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.6%+3.2%+4.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises28500
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.55$0.31$1.43
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+6.4%+3.5%0.0%+2.7%
Evenly matched — KFRC and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LMB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallLimbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LMB vs KFRC vs KELYA vs CSTE vs MAN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LMB or KFRC or KELYA or CSTE or MAN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Limbach Holdings, Inc.

(LMB) is the stronger pick with 24. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for Caesarstone Ltd. (CSTE). Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) offers the better valuation at 18. 4x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LMB or KFRC or KELYA or CSTE or MAN?

On trailing P/E, Limbach Holdings, Inc.

(LMB) is the cheapest at 18. 4x versus Kforce Inc. at 22. 1x. On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LMB or KFRC or KELYA or CSTE or MAN?

Over the past 5 years, Limbach Holdings, Inc.

(LMB) delivered a total return of +594. 8%, compared to -89. 0% for Caesarstone Ltd. (CSTE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LMB returned +648. 8% versus CSTE's -92. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LMB or KFRC or KELYA or CSTE or MAN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.

(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Limbach Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning LMB is approximately 165% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LMB or KFRC or KELYA or CSTE or MAN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Limbach Holdings, Inc.

(LMB) is pulling ahead at 24. 7% versus -10. 4% for Caesarstone Ltd. (CSTE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Limbach Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 56. 4% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LMB leads at 9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LMB or KFRC or KELYA or CSTE or MAN?

Limbach Holdings, Inc.

(LMB) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 5% net margin versus -34. 6% for Caesarstone Ltd. — meaning it keeps 7. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LMB leads at 7. 6% versus -12. 9% for CSTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KFRC leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LMB or KFRC or KELYA or CSTE or MAN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.

(MAN) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Kforce Inc. — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LMB or KFRC or KELYA or CSTE or MAN?

In this comparison, MAN (4.

7% yield), KFRC (3. 6% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. LMB, CSTE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LMB or KFRC or KELYA or CSTE or MAN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.

(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, CSTE: -92. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LMB and KFRC and KELYA and CSTE and MAN?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LMB is a small-cap high-growth stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CSTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. KFRC, KELYA, MAN pay a dividend while LMB, CSTE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LMB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KFRC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KELYA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSTE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MAN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LMB and KFRC and KELYA and CSTE and MAN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LMB: 4.3% · KFRC: 0.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(LMB: 5.1% · KFRC: 2.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LMB: 18.4x · KFRC: 22.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.