LMFA vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs CIFR

For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Cipher Mining Inc.

(CIFR) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -98. 9% for LM Funding America, Inc. (LMFA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +778. 2% versus LMFA's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LM Funding America, Inc.

(LMFA) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 82β versus Cipher Mining Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning CIFR is approximately 37% more volatile than LMFA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 3% for Cipher Mining Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1435. 7% for Cipher Mining Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -367. 2% for Cipher Mining Inc. — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -150. 7% for CIFR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLSK leads at 41. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, CLSK (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. LMFA, MARA, RIOT, CIFR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Riot Platforms, Inc.

(RIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+778. 2% 10Y return). LM Funding America, Inc. (LMFA) carries a higher beta of 2. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RIOT: +778. 2%, LMFA: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (LMFA (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and RIOT (Financial Services) and CLSK (Technology) and CIFR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.