Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LOGC vs EBAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
LOGC vs EBAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $231M | $49.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $11.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $2.04B |
| Gross Margin | 16.3% | 72.0% |
| Operating Margin | -183.7% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $7.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $1.87B |
LOGC vs EBAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ContextLogic Inc. (LOGC) | 100 | 158.4 | +58.4% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 199.5 | +99.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOGC vs EBAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOGC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.45
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, current ratio 31.20x
- Beta 0.45, current ratio 31.20x
EBAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.9%, EPS growth 10.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- 380.7% 10Y total return vs LOGC's 59.9%
- 7.9% revenue growth vs LOGC's -85.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.9% revenue growth vs LOGC's -85.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs LOGC's -174.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs EBAY's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.4% vs LOGC's +24.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs LOGC's -6.4%, ROIC 16.8% vs -169.3% |
LOGC vs EBAY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LOGC vs EBAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY and LOGC operate at a comparable scale, with $11.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LOGC's -174.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +72.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -183.7% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -174.4% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +19.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -83.7% | +5.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LOGC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $231M | $49.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $165M | $54.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.96x | 24.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.37x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 10.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-6 for LOGC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EBAY scores 6/9 vs LOGC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.4% | +44.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -169.3% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.8% | +17.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$66M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 10.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EBAY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $19,232 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,989 for LOGC. Over the past 12 months, EBAY leads with a +55.4% total return vs LOGC's +24.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EBAY at 34.1% vs LOGC's 16.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.4% | +24.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.1% | +55.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.9% | +141.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.9% | +92.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.9% | +380.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.9% | +34.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LOGC and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LOGC is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EBAY's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.14 | $111.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.40 | $67.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.6% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 59.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LOGC as "Buy" and EBAY as "Hold". EBAY is the only dividend payer here at 1.07% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $109.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 68 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +5.1% |
EBAY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LOGC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LOGC vs EBAY: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOGC or EBAY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger pick with 7. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -85. 0% for ContextLogic Inc. (LOGC). eBay Inc. (EBAY) offers the better valuation at 24. 9x trailing P/E (17. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ContextLogic Inc. (LOGC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LOGC or EBAY?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +92. 3%, compared to +59. 9% for ContextLogic Inc. (LOGC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EBAY returned +380. 7% versus LOGC's +59. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LOGC or EBAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ContextLogic Inc.
(LOGC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus eBay Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning EBAY is approximately 61% more volatile than LOGC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LOGC or EBAY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is pulling ahead at 7. 9% versus -85. 0% for ContextLogic Inc. (LOGC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ContextLogic Inc. grew EPS 78. 1% year-over-year, compared to 10. 2% for eBay Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EBAY leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LOGC or EBAY?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -174. 4% for ContextLogic Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus -183. 7% for LOGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LOGC or EBAY?
In this comparison, EBAY (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. LOGC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is LOGC or EBAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +380. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +380. 7%, LOGC: +59. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LOGC and EBAY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
EBAY pays a dividend while LOGC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.