Computer Hardware
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LOGI vs SONO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consumer Electronics
LOGI vs SONO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $15.45B | $1.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.84B | $1.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $711M | $-41M |
| Gross Margin | 43.2% | 44.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.0% | 2.2% |
| Forward P/E | 18.6x | 46.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $60M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.74B | $175M |
LOGI vs SONO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Logitech Internatio… (LOGI) | 100 | 174.0 | +74.0% |
| Sonos, Inc. (SONO) | 100 | 135.9 | +35.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOGI vs SONO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOGI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.36, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 6.3%, EPS growth 16.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.2%
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs SONO's -29.6%
SONO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +49.8% vs LOGI's +37.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.3% revenue growth vs SONO's -4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.6x vs 46.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.7% margin vs SONO's -2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.36 vs SONO's 1.75 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.8% vs LOGI's +37.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs SONO's -4.8%, ROIC 98.0% vs -13.4% |
LOGI vs SONO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LOGI vs SONO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOGI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOGI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 3.3x SONO's $1.5B. LOGI is the more profitable business, keeping 14.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SONO's -2.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.8B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $855M | $64M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $711M | -$41M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $976M | $30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.2% | +44.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +2.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | -2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.4% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | -29.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SONO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LOGI's 17.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SONO's 133.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15.5B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.7B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.96x | -27.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.64x | 46.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.69x | 133.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.19x | 1.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.07x | 4.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.84x | 15.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOGI leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LOGI delivers a 32.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-10 for SONO. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOGI scores 5/9 vs SONO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.3% | -10.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.5% | -4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +98.0% | -13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +31.2% | -9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.7B | -$115M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $175M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $60M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2587.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LOGI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LOGI five years ago would be worth $9,880 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,560 for SONO. Over the past 12 months, SONO leads with a +49.8% total return vs LOGI's +37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LOGI at 19.4% vs SONO's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.1% | -19.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.1% | +49.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.3% | -35.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.2% | -64.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +651.9% | -29.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.4% | -13.5% |
Risk & Volatility
LOGI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LOGI is the less volatile stock with a 1.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SONO's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOGI currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs SONO's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 1.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $123.01 | $19.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $76.52 | $8.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.7% | +70.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.2 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 961K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LOGI as "Hold" and SONO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.2% upside for SONO (target: $20) vs 3.4% for LOGI (target: $109). LOGI is the only dividend payer here at 1.49% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $109.00 | $19.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.57 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.8% |
LOGI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SONO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
LOGI vs SONO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOGI or SONO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Logitech International S.
A. (LOGI) is the stronger pick with 6. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). Logitech International S. A. (LOGI) offers the better valuation at 22. 0x trailing P/E (18. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sonos, Inc. (SONO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LOGI or SONO?
On forward P/E, Logitech International S.
A. is actually cheaper at 18. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LOGI or SONO?
Over the past 5 years, Logitech International S.
A. (LOGI) delivered a total return of -1. 2%, compared to -64. 4% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOGI returned +647. 1% versus SONO's -25. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LOGI or SONO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Logitech International S.
A. (LOGI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus Sonos, Inc. 's 1. 75β — meaning SONO is approximately 29% more volatile than LOGI relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — LOGI or SONO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Logitech International S.
A. (LOGI) is pulling ahead at 6. 3% versus -4. 9% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Logitech International S. A. grew EPS 16. 2% year-over-year, compared to -64. 5% for Sonos, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOGI leads at 2. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LOGI or SONO?
Logitech International S.
A. (LOGI) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 7% net margin versus -4. 2% for Sonos, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOGI leads at 16. 0% versus -3. 5% for SONO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SONO leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LOGI or SONO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Logitech International S.
A. (LOGI) trades at 18. 6x forward P/E versus 46. 9x for Sonos, Inc. — 28. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SONO: 39. 2% to $19. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — LOGI or SONO?
In this comparison, LOGI (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. SONO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LOGI or SONO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Logitech International S.
A. (LOGI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 5% yield, +647. 1% 10Y return). Sonos, Inc. (SONO) carries a higher beta of 1. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOGI: +647. 1%, SONO: -25. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LOGI and SONO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LOGI pays a dividend while SONO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.