LOT
Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$819M
5Y Perf.-87.7%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LOT vs ZK vs NIO vs LI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ZK
ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$6.85B
5Y Perf.+6.0%
NIO
NIO Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$12.28B
5Y Perf.+8.9%
LI
Li Auto Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$35.34B
5Y Perf.-13.1%
LOT vs ZK vs NIO vs LI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | LOT | ZK | NIO | LI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $819M | $6.85B | $12.28B | $35.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $924M | $90.59B | $69.42B | $125.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.10B | $-3.33B | $-24.31B | $4.51B |
| Gross Margin | 3.2% | 18.9% | 10.3% | 19.4% |
| Operating Margin | -85.2% | -4.0% | -32.6% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 2.3x | — | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.19B | $15.60B | $33.82B | $16.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $482M | $7.78B | $19.33B | $65.90B |
LOT vs ZK vs NIO vs LI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LOT
ZK
NIO
LI
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lotus Technology In… (LOT) | 100 | 12.3 | -87.7% |
| ZEEKR Intelligent T… (ZK) | 100 | 106.0 | +6.0% |
| NIO Inc. (NIO) | 100 | 108.9 | +8.9% |
| Li Auto Inc. (LI) | 100 | 86.9 | -13.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOT vs ZK vs NIO vs LI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ZK leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Li Auto Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. NIO also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LOT
Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares
The Growth Angle
LOT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
ZK
ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited
The Income Pick
ZK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.47
- Rev growth 46.9%, EPS growth 34.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 126.6%
- 46.9% revenue growth vs LI's 16.7%
- Lower P/E (2.3x vs 11.3x)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
NIO
NIO Inc.
The Momentum Pick
NIO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +52.9% vs LOT's -34.2%
Best for: momentum
LI
Li Auto Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
LI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 6.9% 10Y total return vs ZK's -5.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 1.82x
- Beta 0.94, current ratio 1.82x
- 3.6% margin vs LOT's -119.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ZK | 46.9% revenue growth vs LI's 16.7% |
| Value | ZK | Lower P/E (2.3x vs 11.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | LI | 3.6% margin vs LOT's -119.2% |
| Stability / Safety | ZK | Beta 0.47 vs LOT's 1.54 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NIO | +52.9% vs LOT's -34.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LI | 2.8% ROA vs LOT's -48.2% |
LOT vs ZK vs NIO vs LI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
FY 2024
FY 2024
LOT vs ZK vs NIO vs LI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLZKLAGGINGNIO
Who Leads Where
ZK leads in 2 of 6 categories
LI leads 1 • LOT leads 0 • NIO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓NIONIO Inc.
0leads
LOTLotus Technology Inc.…
0leads
LILi Auto Inc.
1leads
ZKZEEKR Intelligent Tec…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LIvs LOTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ZK3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LI8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ZK2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ZK and LI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LI is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.7B annually — 136.1x LOT's $924M. LI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LOT's -119.2%. On growth, ZK holds the edge at +36.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | LOTLotus Technology … | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | NIONIO Inc. | LILi Auto Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $924M | $90.6B | $69.4B | $125.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$713M | -$2.7B | -$23.0B | $5.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.1B | -$3.3B | -$24.3B | $4.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$906M | $0 | -$16.5B | -$7.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +18.9% | +10.3% | +19.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -85.2% | -4.0% | -32.6% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -119.2% | -3.7% | -35.0% | +3.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -98.0% | +2.0% | -23.8% | -6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.3% | +36.4% | +9.0% | -36.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.7% | +83.8% | +7.6% | -123.3% |
Evenly matched — ZK and LI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ZK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LOTLotus Technology … | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | NIONIO Inc. | LILi Auto Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $819M | $6.8B | $12.3B | $35.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $14.7B | $14.4B | $28.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.70x | -0.98x | -3.62x | 15.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 2.29x | — | 11.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 20.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.89x | 0.09x | 1.27x | 1.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 6.08x | 1.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.61x | — | 29.32x |
ZK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LI delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-3 for NIO. LI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NIO's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZK scores 5/9 vs LOT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | LOTLotus Technology … | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | NIONIO Inc. | LILi Auto Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | -2.7% | +6.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.2% | -5.4% | -23.7% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | -55.2% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | — | -41.7% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 2.50x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $704M | $7.8B | $14.5B | -$49.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $482M | $7.8B | $19.3B | $65.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $15.6B | $33.8B | $16.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18.02x | -14.40x | -25.29x | 28.54x |
LI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ZK and NIO and LI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LI five years ago would be worth $9,639 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,115 for LOT. Over the past 12 months, NIO leads with a +52.9% total return vs LOT's -34.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZK at -1.8% vs LOT's -51.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LOTLotus Technology … | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | NIONIO Inc. | LILi Auto Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.8% | — | +14.2% | +2.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.2% | +6.1% | +52.9% | -33.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.8% | -5.4% | -29.0% | -28.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.8% | -5.4% | -84.1% | -3.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.8% | -5.4% | -11.1% | +6.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.9% | -1.8% | -10.8% | -10.7% |
Evenly matched — ZK and NIO and LI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZK is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LOT's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZK currently trades 84.3% from its 52-week high vs LOT's 44.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LOTLotus Technology … | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | NIONIO Inc. | LILi Auto Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 0.47x | 1.29x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.75 | $31.71 | $8.02 | $32.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $24.58 | $3.34 | $15.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.0% | +84.3% | +73.2% | +54.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.9 | 40.0 | 44.3 | 44.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 102K | 0 | 39.7M | 3.0M |
ZK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZK as "Buy", NIO as "Buy", LI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.4% upside for ZK (target: $33) vs 9.9% for NIO (target: $6).
| Metric | LOTLotus Technology … | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | NIONIO Inc. | LILi Auto Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.25 | $6.45 | $20.01 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 24 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ZK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). LI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallZEEKR Intelligent Technolog… (ZK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
LOT vs ZK vs NIO vs LI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOT or ZK or NIO or LI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is the stronger pick with 46.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 7% for Li Auto Inc. (LI). Li Auto Inc. (LI) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LOT or ZK or NIO or LI?
On forward P/E, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 2.
3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LOT or ZK or NIO or LI?
Over the past 5 years, Li Auto Inc.
(LI) delivered a total return of -3. 6%, compared to -88. 8% for Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares (LOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LI returned +6. 9% versus LOT's -88. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LOT or ZK or NIO or LI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares's 1. 54β — meaning LOT is approximately 229% more volatile than ZK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Li Auto Inc. (LI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 3% for NIO Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LOT or ZK or NIO or LI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is pulling ahead at 46.
9% versus 16. 7% for Li Auto Inc. (LI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited grew EPS 34. 6% year-over-year, compared to -31. 8% for Li Auto Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOT leads at 530. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LOT or ZK or NIO or LI?
Li Auto Inc.
(LI) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 6% net margin versus -119. 5% for Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LI leads at 4. 4% versus -85. 1% for LOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LI leads at 20. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LOT or ZK or NIO or LI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) trades at 2.
3x forward P/E versus 11. 3x for Li Auto Inc. — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZK: 24. 4% to $33. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — LOT or ZK or NIO or LI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LOT or ZK or NIO or LI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47)). Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares (LOT) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZK: -5. 4%, LOT: -88. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LOT and ZK and NIO and LI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(LOT: -25.3% · ZK: 36.4%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.