Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LOVE vs ETH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
LOVE vs ETH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency |
| Market Cap | $230M | $567M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $690M | $615M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $47M |
| Gross Margin | 57.7% | 60.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 10.1% |
| Forward P/E | 25.9x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $183M | $124M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $84M | $76M |
LOVE vs ETH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 57.7 | -42.3% |
| Grayscale Ethereum … (ETH) | 100 | 72.4 | -27.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOVE vs ETH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOVE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.33
- Rev growth -2.8%, EPS growth -52.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, Low D/E 84.6%, current ratio 1.59x
ETH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -17.2% 10Y total return vs LOVE's -34.2%
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 25.9x)
- 8.4% margin vs LOVE's 1.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.8% revenue growth vs ETH's -4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 25.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs LOVE's 1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs ETH's 2.91 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs LOVE's -23.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs LOVE's 2.6%, ROIC 7.6% vs 3.3% |
LOVE vs ETH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LOVE vs ETH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOVE and ETH operate at a comparable scale, with $690M and $615M in trailing revenue. ETH is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LOVE's 1.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $690M | $615M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $58M | $70M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $47M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.7% | +60.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +10.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +0.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.4% | -28.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ETH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, ETH trades at a 51% valuation discount to LOVE's 22.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ETH's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LOVE's 11.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $230M | $567M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $330M | $615M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.87x | 11.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.94x | 8.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.63x | 9.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 0.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.22x | 1.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.20x | 9999.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ETH leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ETH delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $7 for LOVE. ETH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOVE's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOVE scores 5/9 vs ETH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.5% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.6% | +10.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.85x | 0.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $99M | $47M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $84M | $76M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $183M | $124M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 721.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ETH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ETH five years ago would be worth $7,125 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,300 for LOVE. Over the past 12 months, ETH leads with a +32.7% total return vs LOVE's -23.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ETH at -12.0% vs LOVE's -15.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.3% | -24.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.9% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.5% | -31.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.0% | -28.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.2% | -17.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.4% | -12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
LOVE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LOVE is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ETH's 2.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOVE currently trades 72.1% from its 52-week high vs ETH's 48.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 2.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.90 | $45.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.33 | $16.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.1% | +48.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 299K | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LOVE as "Buy" and ETH as "Hold".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.7% | 0.0% |
ETH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LOVE leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
LOVE vs ETH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOVE or ETH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Lovesac Company (LOVE) is the stronger pick with -2.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Lovesac Company (LOVE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LOVE or ETH?
On trailing P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus The Lovesac Company at 22. 9x. On forward P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LOVE or ETH?
Over the past 5 years, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) delivered a total return of -28.
7%, compared to -77. 0% for The Lovesac Company (LOVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ETH returned -17. 2% versus LOVE's -34. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LOVE or ETH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Lovesac Company (LOVE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
33β versus Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust's 2. 91β — meaning ETH is approximately 119% more volatile than LOVE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 85% for The Lovesac Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LOVE or ETH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Lovesac Company (LOVE) is pulling ahead at -2.
8% versus -4. 9% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust grew EPS -19. 3% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for The Lovesac Company. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LOVE or ETH?
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
4% net margin versus 1. 7% for The Lovesac Company — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ETH leads at 10. 1% versus 2. 0% for LOVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETH leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LOVE or ETH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) trades at 8.
7x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for The Lovesac Company — 17. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — LOVE or ETH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LOVE or ETH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Lovesac Company (LOVE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a higher beta of 2. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOVE: -34. 2%, ETH: -17. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LOVE and ETH?
These companies operate in different sectors (LOVE (Consumer Cyclical) and ETH (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ETH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare LOVE vs HOFT
HOFT is one of the most direct listed alternatives to LOVE.
Compare ETH vs COIN
Compare ETH against another closely matched public peer instead of a generic same-sector name.
Expand With HOFT + FLXS
HOFT and FLXS are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.