Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LPAA vs BFLY vs ACIC vs NHIC vs GS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Asset Management
Financial - Capital Markets
LPAA vs BFLY vs ACIC vs NHIC vs GS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Medical - Devices | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Asset Management | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $210M | $1.11B | $525M | $220M | $287.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $103M | $335M | $0.00 | $126.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-76M | $107M | $3M | $16.67B |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.2% | 63.8% | — | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -79.5% | 42.6% | — | 14.5% |
| Forward P/E | 41.5x | — | 7.3x | 524.4x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $20M | $152M | $0.00 | $616.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $850K | $150M | $199M | $986K | $182.09B |
LPAA vs BFLY vs ACIC vs NHIC vs GS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Launch One Acquisit… (LPAA) | 100 | 104.8 | +4.8% |
| Butterfly Network, … (BFLY) | 100 | 181.2 | +81.2% |
| American Coastal In… (ACIC) | 100 | 94.9 | -5.1% |
| NewHold Investment … (NHIC) | 100 | 105.5 | +5.5% |
| The Goldman Sachs G… (GS) | 100 | 169.1 | +69.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LPAA vs BFLY vs ACIC vs NHIC vs GS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LPAA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, current ratio 9.67x
- Beta 0.01, current ratio 9.67x
- NIM 2.3% vs GS's 0.5%
- Beta 0.01 vs BFLY's 3.28
BFLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 8.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 19.0% revenue growth vs ACIC's 13.1%
- +94.5% vs ACIC's -0.3%
ACIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (7.3x vs 15.6x)
- 31.9% margin vs BFLY's -73.6%
- 9.0% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%, ROIC 41.0% vs -76.8%
Among these 5 stocks, NHIC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.47, yield 1.5%
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs LPAA's 8.1%
- 1.5% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs ACIC's 13.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.3x vs 15.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.9% margin vs BFLY's -73.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs BFLY's 3.28 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.5% vs ACIC's -0.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%, ROIC 41.0% vs -76.8% |
LPAA vs BFLY vs ACIC vs NHIC vs GS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LPAA vs BFLY vs ACIC vs NHIC vs GS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACIC leads in 3 of 6 categories
GS leads 2 • LPAA leads 1 • BFLY leads 0 • NHIC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACIC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GS and NHIC operate at a comparable scale, with $126.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACIC is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFLY's -73.6%. On growth, BFLY holds the edge at +25.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $103M | $335M | $0 | $126.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$76M | $154M | $833,081 | $23.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$76M | $107M | $3M | $16.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$19M | $71M | -$2M | $15.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +49.2% | +63.8% | — | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -79.5% | +42.6% | — | +14.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -73.6% | +31.9% | — | +11.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -18.3% | +21.1% | — | -12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +25.0% | +9.3% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.0% | +4.3% | — | +45.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ACIC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.0x trailing earnings, ACIC trades at a 99% valuation discount to NHIC's 524.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACIC's 2.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GS's 34.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $210M | $1.1B | $525M | $220M | $287.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $209M | $979M | $478M | $219M | $722.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 41.46x | -13.68x | 5.05x | 524.38x | 22.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 7.33x | — | 15.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.63x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 2.93x | — | 34.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 11.37x | 1.56x | — | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 5.35x | 1.70x | 1.07x | 2.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 7.40x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-37 for BFLY. BFLY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GS's 5.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACIC scores 6/9 vs BFLY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.3% | -36.8% | +35.7% | +1.6% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | -25.6% | +9.0% | +1.5% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -76.8% | +41.0% | -0.7% | +1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | -39.3% | +26.0% | -0.9% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.10x | 0.48x | — | 5.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$850,338 | -$130M | -$46M | -$986,000 | $434.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $850,338 | $150M | $199M | $986,000 | $182.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $20M | $152M | $0 | $616.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -71.59x | 14.20x | — | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GS five years ago would be worth $26,440 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,490 for BFLY. Over the past 12 months, BFLY leads with a +94.5% total return vs ACIC's -0.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GS at 43.5% vs NHIC's 2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.7% | +13.1% | +1.9% | +1.7% | +1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.7% | +94.5% | -0.3% | +5.2% | +70.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.1% | +100.9% | +159.1% | +6.1% | +195.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.1% | -65.1% | +107.0% | +6.1% | +164.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.1% | -57.2% | -22.2% | +6.1% | +534.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.6% | +26.2% | +37.3% | +2.0% | +43.5% |
Risk & Volatility
LPAA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LPAA is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LPAA currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs BFLY's 74.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | 3.28x | 0.39x | 0.03x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.88 | $5.72 | $13.06 | $10.87 | $984.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.28 | $1.32 | $9.79 | $9.99 | $547.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.1% | +74.1% | +83.1% | +97.0% | +94.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 46.2 | 31.0 | 69.1 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 6.4M | 188K | 20K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
GS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BFLY as "Buy", ACIC as "Hold", GS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.8% upside for BFLY (target: $5) vs -82.5% for ACIC (target: $2). GS is the only dividend payer here at 1.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.42 | $1.90 | — | $995.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 5 | — | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $13.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.5% |
ACIC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook).
LPAA vs BFLY vs ACIC vs NHIC vs GS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LPAA or BFLY or ACIC or NHIC or GS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 1% for American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC). American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) offers the better valuation at 5. 0x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LPAA or BFLY or ACIC or NHIC or GS?
On trailing P/E, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the cheapest at 5.
0x versus NewHold Investment Corp III at 524. 4x. On forward P/E, American Coastal Insurance Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LPAA or BFLY or ACIC or NHIC or GS?
Over the past 5 years, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) delivered a total return of +164. 4%, compared to -65. 1% for Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GS returned +534. 3% versus BFLY's -57. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LPAA or BFLY or ACIC or NHIC or GS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Launch One Acquisition Corp.
(LPAA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 28β — meaning BFLY is approximately 31104% more volatile than LPAA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 5% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LPAA or BFLY or ACIC or NHIC or GS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 13. 1% for American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NewHold Investment Corp III grew EPS 131. 2% year-over-year, compared to 8. 8% for Butterfly Network, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACIC leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LPAA or BFLY or ACIC or NHIC or GS?
American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
8% net margin versus -79. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACIC leads at 42. 6% versus -88. 5% for BFLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LPAA or BFLY or ACIC or NHIC or GS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) trades at 7.
3x forward P/E versus 15. 6x for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BFLY: 27. 8% to $5. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — LPAA or BFLY or ACIC or NHIC or GS?
In this comparison, GS (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. LPAA, BFLY, ACIC, NHIC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LPAA or BFLY or ACIC or NHIC or GS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Launch One Acquisition Corp.
(LPAA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01)). Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LPAA: +8. 1%, BFLY: -57. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LPAA and BFLY and ACIC and NHIC and GS?
These companies operate in different sectors (LPAA (Financial Services) and BFLY (Healthcare) and ACIC (Financial Services) and NHIC (Financial Services) and GS (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LPAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; NHIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GS is a large-cap high-growth stock. GS pays a dividend while LPAA, BFLY, ACIC, NHIC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.