Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LPCN vs TLSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
LPCN vs TLSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $13M | $192M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-34M |
| Gross Margin | -13.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -413.6% | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $106K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $4M |
LPCN vs TLSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lipocine Inc. (LPCN) | 100 | 15.4 | -84.6% |
| Tiziana Life Scienc… (TLSA) | 100 | 57.0 | -43.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LPCN vs TLSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LPCN is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- -59.4% ROA vs TLSA's -303.2%, ROIC -64.7% vs -481.7%
TLSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.74
- EPS growth 35.3%
- -63.8% 10Y total return vs LPCN's -98.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -57.8% revenue growth vs LPCN's -82.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.2% margin vs LPCN's -5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs LPCN's 0.86 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -3.8% vs LPCN's -27.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -59.4% ROA vs TLSA's -303.2%, ROIC -64.7% vs -481.7% |
LPCN vs TLSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LPCN vs TLSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TLSA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LPCN and TLSA operate at a comparable scale, with $2M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$14M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -13.4% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -54.3% | +27.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LPCN and TLSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $192M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $189M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.41x | -6.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.58x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 20.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LPCN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LPCN delivers a -66.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-67 in annual profit, vs $-9 for TLSA. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TLSA scores 2/9 vs LPCN's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -66.7% | -8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -59.4% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -64.7% | -4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.5% | -3.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $106,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2622.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TLSA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TLSA five years ago would be worth $6,345 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,011 for LPCN. Over the past 12 months, TLSA leads with a -3.8% total return vs LPCN's -27.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TLSA at 23.6% vs LPCN's -16.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -70.1% | -5.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.6% | -3.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | +88.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.9% | -36.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -63.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.7% | +23.6% |
Risk & Volatility
TLSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TLSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPCN's 0.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TLSA currently trades 58.1% from its 52-week high vs LPCN's 19.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.37 | $2.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.81 | $1.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.3% | +58.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.1 | 66.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 463K | 149K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TLSA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). LPCN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
LPCN vs TLSA: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LPCN or TLSA a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (TLSA) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LPCN or TLSA?
Over the past 5 years, Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (TLSA) delivered a total return of -36.
6%, compared to -89. 9% for Lipocine Inc. (LPCN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TLSA returned -63. 8% versus LPCN's -98. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LPCN or TLSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (TLSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
74β versus Lipocine Inc. 's 0. 86β — meaning LPCN is approximately 17% more volatile than TLSA relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — LPCN or TLSA?
Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (TLSA) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -487. 1% for Lipocine Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TLSA leads at 0. 0% versus -524. 7% for LPCN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TLSA leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — LPCN or TLSA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is LPCN or TLSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (TLSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
74)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TLSA: -63. 8%, LPCN: -98. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between LPCN and TLSA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.