LPL
LG Display Co., Ltd.
Consumer Electronics
Market Cap$4.32B
5Y Perf.+1.9%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LPL vs ENTG vs MKSI vs AMAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ENTG
Entegris, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$22.48B
5Y Perf.+146.6%
MKSI
MKS Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$20.25B
5Y Perf.+184.8%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$325.54B
5Y Perf.+630.7%
LPL vs ENTG vs MKSI vs AMAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | LPL | ENTG | MKSI | AMAT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $4.32B | $22.48B | $20.25B | $325.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25.81T | $3.24B | $4.07B | $28.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $226.31B | $265M | $327M | $7.00B |
| Gross Margin | 13.1% | 43.2% | 45.2% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 2.0% | 29.1% | 14.8% | 29.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 41.4x | 30.4x | 37.1x |
| Total Debt | $12.73T | $3.89B | $4.69B | $6.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.57T | $360M | $675M | $7.24B |
LPL vs ENTG vs MKSI vs AMAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LPL
ENTG
MKSI
AMAT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) | 100 | 101.9 | +1.9% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 246.6 | +146.6% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 284.8 | +184.8% |
| Applied Materials, … (AMAT) | 100 | 730.7 | +630.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LPL vs ENTG vs MKSI vs AMAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AMAT leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. LG Display Co., Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. MKSI also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LPL
LG Display Co., Ltd.
The Value Play
LPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 37.1x)
- Beta 1.48 vs ENTG's 2.66
Best for: value and stability
ENTG
Entegris, Inc.
The Secondary Option
ENTG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: technology exposure
MKSI
MKS Inc.
The Growth Play
MKSI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 55.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- 9.6% revenue growth vs LPL's -3.0%
- +306.1% vs LPL's +39.8%
Best for: growth exposure
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
The Income Pick
AMAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 2.14, yield 0.4%
- 20.1% 10Y total return vs ENTG's 10.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.14, Low D/E 32.1%, current ratio 2.61x
- Beta 2.14, yield 0.4%, current ratio 2.61x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MKSI | 9.6% revenue growth vs LPL's -3.0% |
| Value | LPL | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 37.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | AMAT | 24.7% margin vs LPL's 0.9% |
| Stability / Safety | LPL | Beta 1.48 vs ENTG's 2.66 |
| Dividends | AMAT | 0.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) |
| Momentum (1Y) | MKSI | +306.1% vs LPL's +39.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AMAT | 19.3% ROA vs LPL's 0.8%, ROIC 33.3% vs 2.0% |
LPL vs ENTG vs MKSI vs AMAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2024
LPL vs ENTG vs MKSI vs AMAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMATLAGGINGENTG
Who Leads Where
AMAT leads in 3 of 6 categories
LPL leads 1 • MKSI leads 1 • ENTG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓ENTGEntegris, Inc.
0leads
MKSIMKS Inc.
1leads
LPLLG Display Co., Ltd.
1leads
AMATApplied Materials, In…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LPLvs MKSIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AMAT3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
LPL6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AMAT8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MKSI4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
AMAT2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.81T annually — 7977.6x ENTG's $3.2B. AMAT is the more profitable business, keeping 24.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPL's 0.9%. On growth, MKSI holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | LPLLG Display Co., L… | ENTGEntegris, Inc. | MKSIMKS Inc. | AMATApplied Materials… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25.81T | $3.2B | $4.1B | $28.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.87T | $1.3B | $945M | $8.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $226.3B | $265M | $327M | $7.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.04T | $721M | $401M | $5.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +43.2% | +45.2% | +48.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +29.1% | +14.8% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +8.2% | +8.0% | +24.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +22.3% | +9.8% | +20.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.1% | +5.0% | +15.2% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.2% | +46.3% | +53.2% | +13.9% |
AMAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
LPL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.7x trailing earnings, LPL trades at a 71% valuation discount to ENTG's 95.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LPL's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMAT's 38.7x.
| Metric | LPLLG Display Co., L… | ENTGEntegris, Inc. | MKSIMKS Inc. | AMATApplied Materials… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $22.5B | $20.2B | $325.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.0B | $26.0B | $24.3B | $324.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.67x | 95.26x | 68.83x | 47.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 41.38x | 30.36x | 37.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.49x | 19.81x | 26.70x | 38.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.24x | 7.03x | 5.15x | 11.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 5.68x | 7.49x | 16.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.24x | 56.74x | 40.74x | 57.13x |
LPL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMAT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMAT delivers a 34.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $3 for LPL. AMAT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LPL scores 7/9 vs ENTG's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | LPLLG Display Co., L… | ENTGEntegris, Inc. | MKSIMKS Inc. | AMATApplied Materials… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | +6.7% | +12.2% | +34.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +3.1% | +3.7% | +19.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +9.3% | +6.5% | +33.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +11.7% | +7.2% | +30.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.62x | 0.98x | 1.73x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11.16T | $3.5B | $4.0B | -$686M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.57T | $360M | $675M | $7.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.73T | $3.9B | $4.7B | $6.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.96x | 2.47x | 2.84x | 35.46x |
AMAT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MKSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMAT five years ago would be worth $31,383 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,277 for LPL. Over the past 12 months, MKSI leads with a +306.1% total return vs LPL's +39.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKSI at 54.1% vs LPL's -9.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LPLLG Display Co., L… | ENTGEntegris, Inc. | MKSIMKS Inc. | AMATApplied Materials… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.6% | +65.1% | +78.8% | +52.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.8% | +88.9% | +306.1% | +164.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.3% | +87.4% | +266.0% | +258.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.2% | +30.4% | +66.5% | +213.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.0% | +1040.3% | +750.6% | +2014.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.2% | +23.3% | +54.1% | +53.1% |
MKSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LPL and AMAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LPL is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENTG's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMAT currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs LPL's 76.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LPLLG Display Co., L… | ENTGEntegris, Inc. | MKSIMKS Inc. | AMATApplied Materials… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 2.66x | 2.64x | 2.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.67 | $159.15 | $326.83 | $432.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.97 | $66.32 | $71.49 | $151.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.2% | +92.8% | +92.0% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 63.8 | 65.3 | 66.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 2.4M | 1.2M | 6.0M |
Evenly matched — LPL and AMAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
AMAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LPL as "Hold", ENTG as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", AMAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.9% upside for AMAT (target: $426) vs -9.3% for MKSI (target: $273). For income investors, AMAT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.42% vs ENTG's 0.27%.
| Metric | LPLLG Display Co., L… | ENTGEntegris, Inc. | MKSIMKS Inc. | AMATApplied Materials… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $152.00 | $272.86 | $426.39 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 26 | 29 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | +0.3% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.40 | $0.87 | $1.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +1.5% |
AMAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
AMAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LPL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallApplied Materials, Inc. (AMAT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
LPL vs ENTG vs MKSI vs AMAT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LPL or ENTG or MKSI or AMAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the stronger pick with 9. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 0% for LG Display Co. , Ltd. (LPL). LG Display Co. , Ltd. (LPL) offers the better valuation at 27. 7x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LPL or ENTG or MKSI or AMAT?
On trailing P/E, LG Display Co.
, Ltd. (LPL) is the cheapest at 27. 7x versus Entegris, Inc. at 95. 3x. On forward P/E, LG Display Co. , Ltd. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LPL or ENTG or MKSI or AMAT?
Over the past 5 years, Applied Materials, Inc.
(AMAT) delivered a total return of +213. 8%, compared to -57. 2% for LG Display Co. , Ltd. (LPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMAT returned +20. 1% versus LPL's -47. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LPL or ENTG or MKSI or AMAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LG Display Co.
, Ltd. (LPL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus Entegris, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ENTG is approximately 79% more volatile than LPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LPL or ENTG or MKSI or AMAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is pulling ahead at 9. 6% versus -3. 0% for LG Display Co. , Ltd. (LPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LG Display Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 108. 3% year-over-year, compared to -19. 7% for Entegris, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MKSI leads at 3. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LPL or ENTG or MKSI or AMAT?
Applied Materials, Inc.
(AMAT) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus 0. 9% for LG Display Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMAT leads at 29. 2% versus 2. 0% for LPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMAT leads at 48. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LPL or ENTG or MKSI or AMAT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LG Display Co.
, Ltd. (LPL) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 41. 4x for Entegris, Inc. — 41. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMAT: 3. 9% to $426. 39.
08Which pays a better dividend — LPL or ENTG or MKSI or AMAT?
In this comparison, AMAT (0.
4% yield), MKSI (0. 3% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. LPL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LPL or ENTG or MKSI or AMAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Entegris, Inc.
(ENTG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1040% 10Y return). Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENTG: +1040%, AMAT: +20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LPL and ENTG and MKSI and AMAT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(LPL: -8.1% · ENTG: 5.0%)P/E Ratio<
x
(LPL: 27.7x · ENTG: 95.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.