Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LPSN vs NICE vs SPOK vs KORE vs MANH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Telecommunications Services
Software - Application
LPSN vs NICE vs SPOK vs KORE vs MANH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Telecommunications Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $32M | $5.78B | $225M | $156M | $8.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $244M | $2.95B | $103M | $285M | $1.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-67M | $612M | $11M | $-70M | $217M |
| Gross Margin | 62.2% | 66.4% | 91.4% | 55.3% | 55.6% |
| Operating Margin | -9.6% | 21.9% | 13.2% | -4.0% | 25.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.7x | 16.4x | — | 26.8x |
| Total Debt | $392M | $164M | $7M | $307M | $112M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $95M | $379M | $25M | $19M | $329M |
LPSN vs NICE vs SPOK vs KORE vs MANH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| NICE Ltd. (NICE) | 100 | 33.7 | -66.3% |
| Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) | 100 | 97.3 | -2.7% |
| KORE Group Holdings… (KORE) | 100 | 89.7 | -10.3% |
| Manhattan Associate… (MANH) | 100 | 136.5 | +36.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LPSN vs NICE vs SPOK vs KORE vs MANH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, LPSN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.7%, EPS growth 43.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.55x
- PEG 0.33 vs MANH's 1.25
- Beta 0.72, current ratio 1.55x
SPOK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 11.9%
- Beta 0.42 vs LPSN's 2.05
- 11.9% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
KORE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +266.4% vs LPSN's -77.1%
MANH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 145.1% 10Y total return vs SPOK's 13.3%
- 28.0% ROA vs KORE's -16.5%, ROIC 236.8% vs -30.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.7% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 26.8x), PEG 0.33 vs 1.25 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.8% margin vs LPSN's -27.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs LPSN's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +266.4% vs LPSN's -77.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 28.0% ROA vs KORE's -16.5%, ROIC 236.8% vs -30.4% |
LPSN vs NICE vs SPOK vs KORE vs MANH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LPSN vs NICE vs SPOK vs KORE vs MANH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KORE leads in 2 of 6 categories
NICE leads 1 • MANH leads 1 • SPOK leads 1 • LPSN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NICE and MANH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 28.5x SPOK's $103M. NICE is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPSN's -27.6%. On growth, NICE holds the edge at +9.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $244M | $2.9B | $103M | $285M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$562,000 | $845M | $17M | $44M | $288M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$67M | $612M | $11M | -$70M | $217M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$43M | $665M | $26M | $3M | $380M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.2% | +66.4% | +91.4% | +55.3% | +55.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.6% | +21.9% | +13.2% | -4.0% | +25.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.6% | +20.8% | +10.3% | -24.5% | +19.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.4% | +22.6% | +24.7% | +1.0% | +34.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.0% | +9.0% | -100.0% | -0.3% | +7.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.4% | +56.5% | -64.0% | +36.0% | -3.5% |
Valuation Metrics
NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, NICE trades at a 75% valuation discount to MANH's 39.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NICE offers better value at 0.37x vs MANH's 1.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32M | $5.8B | $225M | $156M | $8.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $329M | $5.6B | $206M | $444M | $8.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.22x | 9.89x | 14.44x | -1.21x | 39.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.74x | 16.41x | — | 26.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.37x | — | — | 1.86x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.59x | 8.91x | — | 28.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 1.96x | 1.61x | 0.54x | 7.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.56x | 1.56x | — | 27.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.22x | 8.91x | — | 22.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MANH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MANH delivers a 78.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $78 in annual profit, vs $7 for SPOK. NICE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MANH's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NICE scores 7/9 vs KORE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +16.4% | +7.3% | — | +78.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.4% | +11.8% | +5.2% | -16.5% | +28.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.6% | +13.2% | +11.3% | -30.4% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.8% | +16.1% | +12.1% | -22.7% | +76.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 0.05x | — | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $297M | -$216M | -$18M | $288M | -$216M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $95M | $379M | $25M | $19M | $329M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $392M | $164M | $7M | $307M | $112M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.20x | — | — | -1.96x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KORE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPOK five years ago would be worth $16,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, KORE leads with a +266.4% total return vs LPSN's -77.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KORE at 16.5% vs LPSN's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.1% | -14.6% | -14.3% | +105.8% | -14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -77.1% | -40.4% | -26.7% | +266.4% | -21.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | -49.3% | +13.4% | +57.9% | -15.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -59.1% | +61.9% | -7.4% | +8.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.0% | +50.7% | +13.3% | -9.8% | +145.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -65.4% | -20.2% | +4.3% | +16.5% | -5.4% |
Risk & Volatility
KORE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KORE is the less volatile stock with a -0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPSN's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KORE currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.05x | 0.72x | 0.42x | -0.09x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.60 | $180.61 | $19.31 | $9.21 | $247.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.37 | $94.89 | $9.96 | $2.00 | $119.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.4% | +53.0% | +56.1% | +99.5% | +58.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.3 | 40.9 | 36.7 | 74.2 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 148K | 631K | 185K | 137K | 678K |
Analyst Outlook
SPOK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NICE as "Buy", SPOK as "Hold", KORE as "Buy", MANH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.8% upside for NICE (target: $151) vs 37.4% for MANH (target: $197). SPOK is the only dividend payer here at 11.95% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $150.88 | $15.00 | — | $197.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 1 | 9 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +11.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 5 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.29 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.5% | +1.3% | +0.3% | +3.7% |
KORE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). NICE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LPSN vs NICE vs SPOK vs KORE vs MANH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LPSN or NICE or SPOK or KORE or MANH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the stronger pick with 7. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). NICE Ltd. (NICE) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NICE Ltd. (NICE) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LPSN or NICE or SPOK or KORE or MANH?
On trailing P/E, NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, NICE Ltd. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NICE Ltd. wins at 0. 33x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LPSN or NICE or SPOK or KORE or MANH?
Over the past 5 years, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) delivered a total return of +61. 9%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MANH returned +145. 1% versus LPSN's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LPSN or NICE or SPOK or KORE or MANH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KORE Group Holdings, Inc.
(KORE) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 09β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately -2388% more volatile than KORE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NICE Ltd. (NICE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 36% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LPSN or NICE or SPOK or KORE or MANH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is pulling ahead at 7. 7% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LivePerson, Inc. grew EPS 45. 4% year-over-year, compared to 2. 6% for Manhattan Associates, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MANH leads at 12. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LPSN or NICE or SPOK or KORE or MANH?
NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 8% net margin versus -51. 1% for KORE Group Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MANH leads at 26. 1% versus -35. 9% for KORE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPOK leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LPSN or NICE or SPOK or KORE or MANH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NICE Ltd. (NICE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 33x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NICE Ltd. (NICE) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 26. 8x for Manhattan Associates, Inc. — 18. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NICE: 57. 8% to $150. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — LPSN or NICE or SPOK or KORE or MANH?
In this comparison, SPOK (11.
9% yield) pays a dividend. LPSN, NICE, KORE, MANH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LPSN or NICE or SPOK or KORE or MANH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 11. 9% yield). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPOK: +13. 3%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LPSN and NICE and SPOK and KORE and MANH?
These companies operate in different sectors (LPSN (Technology) and NICE (Technology) and SPOK (Healthcare) and KORE (Communication Services) and MANH (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock; KORE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MANH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SPOK pays a dividend while LPSN, NICE, KORE, MANH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.