Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LPX vs WFG vs UFPI vs BXC vs WY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Construction
REIT - Specialty
LPX vs WFG vs UFPI vs BXC vs WY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Construction | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $5.28B | $4.78B | $4.76B | $409M | $17.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.56B | $5.81B | $6.19B | $2.98B | $6.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $82M | $-1.46B | $264M | $-4M | $397M |
| Gross Margin | 19.8% | 2.0% | 16.6% | 15.0% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | -12.8% | 5.4% | 0.9% | 7.7% |
| Forward P/E | 29.9x | — | 15.9x | 58.4x | 83.6x |
| Total Debt | $401M | $457M | $230M | $674M | $5.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $292M | $277M | $925M | $386M | $464M |
LPX vs WFG vs UFPI vs BXC vs WY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana-Pacific C… (LPX) | 100 | 319.9 | +219.9% |
| West Fraser Timber … (WFG) | 100 | 233.3 | +133.3% |
| UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) | 100 | 183.4 | +83.4% |
| BlueLinx Holdings I… (BXC) | 100 | 762.2 | +662.2% |
| Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) | 100 | 117.4 | +17.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LPX vs WFG vs UFPI vs BXC vs WY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LPX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 346.8% 10Y total return vs BXC's 6.7%
WFG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.1%
- Rev growth 23.5%, EPS growth -222.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 5.7%, current ratio 2.13x
- 23.5% revenue growth vs LPX's -7.9%
UFPI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and efficiency is your priority.
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 83.6x)
- 6.5% ROA vs WFG's -15.2%, ROIC 11.4% vs -6.8%
Among these 5 stocks, BXC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.51, yield 3.5%, current ratio 1.29x
- 5.7% margin vs WFG's -25.2%
- Beta 0.51 vs BXC's 1.86, lower leverage
- 3.5% yield, vs UFPI's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.5% revenue growth vs LPX's -7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 83.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs WFG's -25.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs BXC's 1.86, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, vs UFPI's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.0% vs BXC's -18.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs WFG's -15.2%, ROIC 11.4% vs -6.8% |
LPX vs WFG vs UFPI vs BXC vs WY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LPX vs WFG vs UFPI vs BXC vs WY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WY leads in 2 of 6 categories
BXC leads 1 • UFPI leads 1 • LPX leads 1 • WFG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WY is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 2.7x LPX's $2.6B. WY is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WFG's -25.2%. On growth, BXC holds the edge at +3.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $5.8B | $6.2B | $3.0B | $6.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $246M | -$139M | $498M | $70M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $82M | -$1.5B | $264M | -$4M | $397M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$632M | $298M | $31M | $516M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +2.0% | +16.6% | +15.0% | +13.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | -12.8% | +5.4% | +0.9% | +7.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | -25.2% | +4.3% | -0.1% | +5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | -10.9% | +4.8% | +1.0% | +7.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.7% | -8.6% | -8.4% | +3.1% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -70.0% | -5.6% | -31.5% | -154.5% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BXC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.8x trailing earnings, UFPI trades at a 99% valuation discount to BXC's 1905.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UFPI's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WFG's 69.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.3B | $4.8B | $4.8B | $409M | $17.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.4B | $4.9B | $4.1B | $697M | $22.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.32x | -5.18x | 16.77x | 1905.43x | 52.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.89x | — | 15.92x | 58.43x | 83.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.67x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.33x | 69.52x | 7.70x | 9.63x | 22.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.95x | 0.85x | 0.75x | 0.14x | 2.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.05x | 0.85x | 1.60x | 0.68x | 1.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 57.98x | — | 17.24x | 12.46x | 194.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UFPI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UFPI delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-20 for WFG. WFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXC's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LPX scores 5/9 vs WY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | -19.9% | +8.4% | -0.7% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | -15.2% | +6.5% | -0.3% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | -6.8% | +11.4% | +2.9% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | -7.6% | +10.2% | +2.4% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.06x | 0.07x | 1.09x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $109M | $180M | -$695M | $288M | $5.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $292M | $277M | $925M | $386M | $464M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $401M | $457M | $230M | $674M | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.67x | -8.07x | 43.92x | 0.69x | 1.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LPX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LPX five years ago would be worth $11,049 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,633 for WY. Over the past 12 months, WY leads with a -5.0% total return vs BXC's -18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LPX at 7.6% vs BXC's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.2% | +0.6% | -8.6% | -13.4% | +0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.5% | -13.5% | -12.0% | -18.9% | -5.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.6% | -13.2% | +6.3% | -29.1% | -11.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.5% | -20.6% | +1.5% | -21.3% | -23.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +346.8% | +117.5% | +230.6% | +673.4% | +16.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.6% | -4.6% | +2.1% | -10.8% | -4.1% |
Risk & Volatility
WY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WY is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BXC's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WY currently trades 85.1% from its 52-week high vs BXC's 59.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 0.66x | 0.92x | 1.86x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $102.86 | $78.55 | $118.00 | $88.30 | $27.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $66.68 | $57.34 | $80.06 | $44.84 | $21.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.4% | +80.0% | +71.1% | +59.6% | +85.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.6 | 45.7 | 35.6 | 56.2 | 45.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 173K | 379K | 109K | 5.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UFPI and WY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LPX as "Buy", WFG as "Buy", UFPI as "Buy", BXC as "Buy", WY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.0% upside for LPX (target: $102) vs 22.8% for UFPI (target: $103). For income investors, WY offers the higher dividend yield at 3.54% vs LPX's 1.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $102.00 | $80.67 | $103.00 | $68.00 | $29.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +2.1% | +1.7% | — | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 10 | 13 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.11 | $1.79 | $1.40 | — | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +2.8% | +9.1% | +9.9% | +0.9% |
WY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). BXC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LPX vs WFG vs UFPI vs BXC vs WY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LPX or WFG or UFPI or BXC or WY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, West Fraser Timber Co.
Ltd. (WFG) is the stronger pick with 23. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 9% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX). UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LPX or WFG or UFPI or BXC or WY?
On trailing P/E, UFP Industries, Inc.
(UFPI) is the cheapest at 16. 8x versus BlueLinx Holdings Inc. at 1905. 4x. On forward P/E, UFP Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LPX or WFG or UFPI or BXC or WY?
Over the past 5 years, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) delivered a total return of +10.
5%, compared to -23. 7% for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BXC returned +673. 4% versus WY's +16. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LPX or WFG or UFPI or BXC or WY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus BlueLinx Holdings Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning BXC is approximately 262% more volatile than WY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 109% for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LPX or WFG or UFPI or BXC or WY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), West Fraser Timber Co.
Ltd. (WFG) is pulling ahead at 23. 5% versus -7. 9% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Weyerhaeuser Company grew EPS -16. 7% year-over-year, compared to -222. 8% for West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WFG leads at -7. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LPX or WFG or UFPI or BXC or WY?
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
4% net margin versus -17. 2% for West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LPX leads at 9. 6% versus -8. 7% for WFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LPX leads at 21. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LPX or WFG or UFPI or BXC or WY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, UFP Industries, Inc.
(UFPI) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 83. 6x for Weyerhaeuser Company — 67. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LPX: 35. 0% to $102. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LPX or WFG or UFPI or BXC or WY?
In this comparison, WY (3.
5% yield), WFG (2. 1% yield), UFPI (1. 7% yield), LPX (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. BXC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LPX or WFG or UFPI or BXC or WY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 3. 5% yield). BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WY: +16. 5%, BXC: +673. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LPX and WFG and UFPI and BXC and WY?
These companies operate in different sectors (LPX (Basic Materials) and WFG (Basic Materials) and UFPI (Basic Materials) and BXC (Industrials) and WY (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LPX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WFG is a small-cap high-growth stock; UFPI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BXC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. LPX, WFG, UFPI, WY pay a dividend while BXC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.