Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LQDA vs MNKD vs UTHR vs INSM vs RARE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.67B
5Y Perf.+357.6%
MNKD
MannKind Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.10B
5Y Perf.+135.1%
UTHR
United Therapeutics Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$24.95B
5Y Perf.+382.6%
INSM
Insmed Incorporated

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$22.62B
5Y Perf.+331.5%
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.57B
5Y Perf.-61.8%

LQDA vs MNKD vs UTHR vs INSM vs RARE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LQDA logoLQDA
MNKD logoMNKD
UTHR logoUTHR
INSM logoINSM
RARE logoRARE
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$3.67B$1.10B$24.95B$22.62B$2.57B
Revenue (TTM)$69M$361M$3.17B$606M$669M
Net Income (TTM)$-122M$-24M$1.29B$-1.28B$-609M
Gross Margin89.4%79.3%86.6%79.4%83.6%
Operating Margin-155.0%4.1%45.3%-194.0%-83.9%
Forward P/E17.5x217.8x19.4x
Total Debt$122M$473M$0.00$768M$1.28B
Cash & Equiv.$176M$75M$1.56B$510M$434M

LQDA vs MNKD vs UTHR vs INSM vs RARELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LQDA
MNKD
UTHR
INSM
RARE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Liquidia Corporation (LQDA)100457.6+357.6%
MannKind Corporation (MNKD)100235.1+135.1%
United Therapeutics… (UTHR)100482.6+382.6%
Insmed Incorporated (INSM)100431.5+331.5%
Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE)10038.2-61.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LQDA vs MNKD vs UTHR vs INSM vs RARE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: UTHR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Liquidia Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. INSM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
The Value Play

LQDA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.

  • Better valuation composite
  • +172.2% vs MNKD's -26.8%
Best for: value and momentum
MNKD
MannKind Corporation
The Growth Angle

MNKD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
UTHR
United Therapeutics Corporation
The Income Pick

UTHR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.19
  • Beta 0.19, current ratio 6.60x
  • 40.6% margin vs INSM's -210.5%
  • Beta 0.19 vs RARE's 1.42
Best for: income & stability and defensive
INSM
Insmed Incorporated
The Growth Play

INSM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 66.7%, EPS growth -15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.2%
  • 7.9% 10Y total return vs LQDA's 280.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 3.83x
  • 66.7% revenue growth vs LQDA's -20.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthINSM logoINSM66.7% revenue growth vs LQDA's -20.0%
ValueLQDA logoLQDABetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsUTHR logoUTHR40.6% margin vs INSM's -210.5%
Stability / SafetyUTHR logoUTHRBeta 0.19 vs RARE's 1.42
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LQDA logoLQDA+172.2% vs MNKD's -26.8%
Efficiency (ROA)UTHR logoUTHR17.2% ROA vs INSM's -57.3%, ROIC 21.1% vs -86.5%

LQDA vs MNKD vs UTHR vs INSM vs RARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LQDALiquidia Corporation
FY 2020
Promotion Agreement
100.0%$739,628
Research and Development Services
0.0%$0
MNKDMannKind Corporation
FY 2025
Product Revenue
62.0%$217M
Royalty
36.7%$128M
Service
1.2%$4M
UTHRUnited Therapeutics Corporation
FY 2025
Tyvaso
59.0%$1.9B
Remodulin
16.6%$527M
Orenitram
15.6%$497M
Unituxin
7.1%$227M
Adcirca
0.9%$30M
Product and Service, Other
0.8%$24M
INSMInsmed Incorporated
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$606M
RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
54.8%$369M
Royalty
45.2%$304M

LQDA vs MNKD vs UTHR vs INSM vs RARE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUTHRLAGGINGRARE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — LQDA and UTHR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

UTHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 45.8x LQDA's $69M. UTHR is the more profitable business, keeping 40.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INSM's -2.1%. On growth, LQDA holds the edge at +11.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLQDA logoLQDALiquidia Corporat…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…INSM logoINSMInsmed Incorporat…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$69M$361M$3.2B$606M$669M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$106M$25M$1.6B-$1.2B-$536M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$122M-$24M$1.3B-$1.3B-$609M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$108M$13M$1.0B-$998M-$487M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+89.4%+79.3%+86.6%+79.4%+83.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-155.0%+4.1%+45.3%-194.0%-83.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-176.0%-6.6%+40.6%-2.1%-91.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-155.8%+3.6%+32.1%-164.5%-72.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.2%+15.1%-1.6%+152.6%-2.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+86.4%-2.2%-12.2%-16.7%-17.2%
Evenly matched — LQDA and UTHR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

UTHR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 20.4x trailing earnings, UTHR trades at a 88% valuation discount to MNKD's 177.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UTHR's 14.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNKD's 29.3x.

MetricLQDA logoLQDALiquidia Corporat…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…INSM logoINSMInsmed Incorporat…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
Market CapShares × price$3.7B$1.1B$24.9B$22.6B$2.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.6B$1.5B$23.4B$22.9B$3.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-25.47x177.50x20.43x-16.35x-4.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.54x217.79x19.38x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.06x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.26x14.82x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue262.27x3.14x7.84x37.30x3.82x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share43.06x3.84x30.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF80.08x23.97x
UTHR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UTHR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

UTHR delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. INSM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LQDA's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UTHR scores 7/9 vs LQDA's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLQDA logoLQDALiquidia Corporat…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…INSM logoINSMInsmed Incorporat…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-5.5%+19.2%-168.4%-6.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-44.2%-3.9%+17.2%-57.3%-45.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.0%+21.6%+21.1%-86.5%-89.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-84.1%+8.3%+21.4%-66.8%-46.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–914744
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.58x1.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$54M$399M-$1.6B$258M$842M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$176M$75M$1.6B$510M$434M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$122M$473M$0$768M$1.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.63x0.75x125.37x-14.23x-14.49x
UTHR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LQDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LQDA five years ago would be worth $159,547 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, LQDA leads with a +172.2% total return vs MNKD's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LQDA at 77.2% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLQDA logoLQDALiquidia Corporat…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…INSM logoINSMInsmed Incorporat…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+34.6%-36.6%+14.6%-40.8%+10.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+172.2%-26.8%+85.4%+53.5%-21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+456.3%-8.5%+170.4%+454.5%-44.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1495.5%-17.2%+191.3%+221.7%-77.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+280.9%-46.2%+410.0%+793.5%-59.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+77.2%-2.9%+39.3%+77.0%-17.8%
LQDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

UTHR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

UTHR is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UTHR currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs INSM's 49.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLQDA logoLQDALiquidia Corporat…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…INSM logoINSMInsmed Incorporat…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.24x0.90x0.19x0.54x1.42x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$46.67$6.51$609.35$212.75$42.37
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.85$2.23$272.12$63.81$18.29
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.6%+54.5%+93.4%+49.3%+61.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.274.365.041.966.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M6.4M516K2.3M1.8M
UTHR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: LQDA as "Buy", MNKD as "Buy", UTHR as "Buy", INSM as "Buy", RARE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 107.2% upside for INSM (target: $217) vs 7.3% for UTHR (target: $611).

MetricLQDA logoLQDALiquidia Corporat…MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…INSM logoINSMInsmed Incorporat…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$50.67$7.00$610.67$217.11$51.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts719303533
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

UTHR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LQDA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallUnited Therapeutics Corpora… (UTHR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LQDA vs MNKD vs UTHR vs INSM vs RARE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LQDA or MNKD or UTHR or INSM or RARE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger pick with 66.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 0% for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA). United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) offers the better valuation at 20. 4x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LQDA or MNKD or UTHR or INSM or RARE?

On trailing P/E, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the cheapest at 20.

4x versus MannKind Corporation at 177. 5x. On forward P/E, Liquidia Corporation is actually cheaper at 17. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LQDA or MNKD or UTHR or INSM or RARE?

Over the past 5 years, Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) delivered a total return of +1495%, compared to -77.

2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSM returned +793. 5% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LQDA or MNKD or UTHR or INSM or RARE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

19β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning RARE is approximately 640% more volatile than UTHR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 104% versus 158% for Liquidia Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LQDA or MNKD or UTHR or INSM or RARE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is pulling ahead at 66.

7% versus -20. 0% for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Therapeutics Corporation grew EPS 13. 1% year-over-year, compared to -79. 4% for MannKind Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNKD leads at 51. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LQDA or MNKD or UTHR or INSM or RARE?

United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the more profitable company, earning 41.

9% net margin versus -931. 7% for Liquidia Corporation — meaning it keeps 41. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UTHR leads at 46. 9% versus -866. 6% for LQDA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UTHR leads at 87. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LQDA or MNKD or UTHR or INSM or RARE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) trades at 17.

5x forward P/E versus 217. 8x for MannKind Corporation — 200. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INSM: 107. 2% to $217. 11.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LQDA or MNKD or UTHR or INSM or RARE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is LQDA or MNKD or UTHR or INSM or RARE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

19), +410. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UTHR: +410. 0%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LQDA and MNKD and UTHR and INSM and RARE?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LQDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNKD is a small-cap high-growth stock; UTHR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; INSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LQDA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 560%
  • Gross Margin > 53%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MNKD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 47%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UTHR

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INSM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 76%
  • Gross Margin > 47%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RARE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LQDA and MNKD and UTHR and INSM and RARE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LQDA: 1121.7% · MNKD: 15.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.