Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LRMR vs FOLD vs ACAD vs RARE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
LRMR vs FOLD vs ACAD vs RARE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $342M | $4.55B | $3.86B | $2.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $634M | $1.10B | $669M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-166M | $-27M | $376M | $-609M |
| Gross Margin | — | 87.9% | 91.5% | 83.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.2% | 7.4% | -83.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.6x | 50.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $4M | $483M | $52M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $214M | $178M | $434M |
LRMR vs FOLD vs ACAD vs RARE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Larimar Therapeutic… (LRMR) | 100 | 32.5 | -67.5% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 115.9 | +15.9% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.4 | -54.6% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LRMR vs FOLD vs ACAD vs RARE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LRMR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FOLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.63
- 119.2% 10Y total return vs ACAD's -22.9%
- Beta 0.63, current ratio 2.84x
- Better valuation composite
ACAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 3.83x
- 34.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
- 26.2% ROA vs LRMR's -101.4%, ROIC 10.0% vs -184.2%
RARE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.1%, EPS growth 7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
- 20.1% revenue growth vs LRMR's -105.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.1% revenue growth vs LRMR's -105.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs LRMR's 2.17 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.9% vs RARE's -21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs LRMR's -101.4%, ROIC 10.0% vs -184.2% |
LRMR vs FOLD vs ACAD vs RARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LRMR vs FOLD vs ACAD vs RARE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACAD leads in 3 of 6 categories
FOLD leads 2 • LRMR leads 0 • RARE leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD and LRMR operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, FOLD holds the edge at +23.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $634M | $1.1B | $669M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$172M | $40M | $96M | -$536M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$166M | -$27M | $376M | -$609M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$113M | $30M | $212M | -$487M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +87.9% | +91.5% | +83.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.2% | +7.4% | -83.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -4.3% | +34.3% | -91.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +4.7% | +19.4% | -72.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +23.7% | +9.7% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -62.2% | -89.0% | -81.8% | -17.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ACAD's 26.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $342M | $4.5B | $3.9B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $261M | $4.8B | $3.7B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.76x | -164.85x | 9.85x | -4.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.62x | 50.91x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 114.88x | 26.91x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 7.17x | 3.61x | 3.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.74x | 16.29x | 3.15x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 152.43x | 36.74x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. ACAD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs LRMR's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -137.7% | -12.0% | +35.6% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -101.4% | -3.2% | +26.2% | -45.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -184.2% | +5.3% | +10.0% | -89.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -134.3% | +5.1% | +10.1% | -46.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 1.76x | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$81M | $269M | -$126M | $842M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $214M | $178M | $434M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $483M | $52M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.00x | — | -14.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FOLD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FOLD five years ago would be worth $14,862 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +137.9% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FOLD at 6.0% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.3% | +1.5% | -13.7% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +84.3% | +137.9% | +52.4% | -21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.0% | +19.0% | +4.7% | -44.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.1% | +48.6% | +7.1% | -77.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | +119.2% | -22.9% | -59.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.0% | +6.0% | +1.5% | -17.8% |
Risk & Volatility
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LRMR's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.17x | 0.63x | 1.26x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.42 | $14.50 | $27.81 | $42.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.73 | $5.51 | $14.45 | $18.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.3% | +99.9% | +81.1% | +61.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.2 | 72.2 | 44.2 | 66.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 3.0M | 1.8M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LRMR as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", RARE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 200.0% upside for LRMR (target: $12) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $14.50 | $34.78 | $51.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 24 | 37 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACAD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FOLD leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
LRMR vs FOLD vs ACAD vs RARE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LRMR or FOLD or ACAD or RARE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Larimar Therapeutics, Inc. (LRMR) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LRMR or FOLD or ACAD or RARE?
On forward P/E, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 40. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LRMR or FOLD or ACAD or RARE?
Over the past 5 years, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) delivered a total return of +48. 6%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOLD returned +119. 2% versus LRMR's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LRMR or FOLD or ACAD or RARE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Larimar Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 17β — meaning LRMR is approximately 244% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LRMR or FOLD or ACAD or RARE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -72. 0% for Larimar Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LRMR or FOLD or ACAD or RARE?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LRMR or FOLD or ACAD or RARE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) trades at 40. 6x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 10. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LRMR: 200. 0% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LRMR or FOLD or ACAD or RARE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LRMR or FOLD or ACAD or RARE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +119. 2% 10Y return). Larimar Therapeutics, Inc. (LRMR) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, LRMR: -94. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LRMR and FOLD and ACAD and RARE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LRMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.