Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LTBR vs OKLO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
LTBR vs OKLO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $353M | $11.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $-106M |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $202M | $788M |
LTBR vs OKLO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lightbridge Corpora… (LTBR) | 100 | 504.4 | +404.4% |
| Oklo Inc. (OKLO) | 100 | 713.4 | +613.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LTBR vs OKLO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LTBR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 154.5% revenue growth vs OKLO's -47.5%
OKLO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 3.12
- EPS growth 3.3%
- 384.4% 10Y total return vs LTBR's -56.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 154.5% revenue growth vs OKLO's -47.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.9% margin vs LTBR's 1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 3.12 vs LTBR's 3.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +164.9% vs LTBR's +45.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -11.1% ROA vs LTBR's -12.5%, ROIC -24.7% vs -21.0% |
LTBR vs OKLO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LTBR vs OKLO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LTBR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LTBR and OKLO operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | -$139M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | -$106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | -$572M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LTBR and OKLO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $353M | $11.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $151M | $10.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.02x | -99.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.65x | 7.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OKLO leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OKLO delivers a -11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-12 in annual profit, vs $-13 for LTBR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OKLO scores 4/9 vs LTBR's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.6% | -11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.5% | -11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.0% | -24.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.1% | -15.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$202M | -$787M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $202M | $788M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OKLO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OKLO five years ago would be worth $48,442 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $29,041 for LTBR. Over the past 12 months, OKLO leads with a +164.9% total return vs LTBR's +45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OKLO at 69.2% vs LTBR's 57.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.5% | -7.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.7% | +164.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +291.4% | +384.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +190.4% | +384.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.3% | +384.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +57.6% | +69.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LTBR and OKLO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OKLO is the less volatile stock with a 3.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LTBR's 3.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LTBR currently trades 43.5% from its 52-week high vs OKLO's 37.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.51x | 3.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.34 | $193.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.21 | $25.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.5% | +37.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 843K | 11.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $114.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OKLO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). LTBR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
LTBR vs OKLO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LTBR or OKLO a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Oklo Inc.
(OKLO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LTBR or OKLO?
Over the past 5 years, Oklo Inc.
(OKLO) delivered a total return of +384. 4%, compared to +190. 4% for Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OKLO returned +384. 4% versus LTBR's -56. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LTBR or OKLO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Oklo Inc.
(OKLO) is the lower-risk stock at 3. 12β versus Lightbridge Corporation's 3. 51β — meaning LTBR is approximately 12% more volatile than OKLO relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LTBR or OKLO?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oklo Inc.
grew EPS 3. 3% year-over-year, compared to 1. 2% for Lightbridge Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LTBR or OKLO?
Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Oklo Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LTBR leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for OKLO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LTBR leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LTBR or OKLO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LTBR or OKLO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Oklo Inc.
(OKLO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+384. 4% 10Y return). Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) carries a higher beta of 3. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OKLO: +384. 4%, LTBR: -56. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LTBR and OKLO?
These companies operate in different sectors (LTBR (Industrials) and OKLO (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.