Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OKLO vs SMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
OKLO vs SMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $10.98B | $1.95B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $64M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-106M | $-380M |
| Gross Margin | — | 66.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -9.8% |
| Total Debt | $1M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $788M | $836M |
OKLO vs SMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklo Inc. (OKLO) | 100 | 679.0 | +579.0% |
| NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR) | 100 | 136.2 | +36.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OKLO vs SMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OKLO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 3.12
- EPS growth 3.3%
- 361.1% 10Y total return vs SMR's 19.5%
In this particular matchup, SMR is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -47.5% revenue growth vs SMR's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.9% margin vs SMR's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 3.12 vs SMR's 3.50 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +168.5% vs SMR's -30.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -11.1% ROA vs SMR's -43.0%, ROIC -24.7% vs -314.7% |
OKLO vs SMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OKLO vs SMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OKLO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMR and OKLO operate at a comparable scale, with $64M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $64M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$139M | -$627M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$106M | -$380M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$572M | -$584M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +66.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -9.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -9.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | -9.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OKLO and SMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.0B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.2B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -94.97x | -5.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.78x | 1.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OKLO leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OKLO delivers a -11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-12 in annual profit, vs $-87 for SMR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OKLO scores 4/9 vs SMR's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.6% | -87.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.1% | -43.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.7% | -3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.7% | -87.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 0 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$787M | -$836M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $788M | $836M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OKLO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OKLO five years ago would be worth $46,109 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,902 for SMR. Over the past 12 months, OKLO leads with a +168.5% total return vs SMR's -30.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OKLO at 66.4% vs SMR's 13.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.1% | -27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +168.5% | -30.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +361.1% | +47.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +361.1% | +19.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +361.1% | +19.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +66.4% | +13.8% |
Risk & Volatility
OKLO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OKLO is the less volatile stock with a 3.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMR's 3.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OKLO currently trades 35.3% from its 52-week high vs SMR's 20.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.12x | 3.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $193.84 | $57.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.53 | $8.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.3% | +20.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 52.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.6M | 25.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OKLO as "Buy" and SMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.4% upside for OKLO (target: $115) vs 52.8% for SMR (target: $18).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $114.50 | $18.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OKLO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
OKLO vs SMR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OKLO or SMR a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Oklo Inc.
(OKLO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OKLO or SMR?
Over the past 5 years, Oklo Inc.
(OKLO) delivered a total return of +361. 1%, compared to +19. 0% for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OKLO returned +361. 1% versus SMR's +19. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OKLO or SMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Oklo Inc.
(OKLO) is the lower-risk stock at 3. 12β versus NuScale Power Corporation's 3. 50β — meaning SMR is approximately 12% more volatile than OKLO relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — OKLO or SMR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oklo Inc.
grew EPS 3. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 6% for NuScale Power Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OKLO or SMR?
Oklo Inc.
(OKLO) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -594. 6% for NuScale Power Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OKLO leads at 0. 0% versus -984. 0% for SMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMR leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OKLO or SMR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is OKLO or SMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Oklo Inc.
(OKLO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+361. 1% 10Y return). NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OKLO: +361. 1%, SMR: +19. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OKLO and SMR?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.