Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LTRX vs CIEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
LTRX vs CIEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $231M | $76.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $119M | $5.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $229M |
| Gross Margin | 42.9% | 40.6% |
| Operating Margin | -5.4% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 34.8x | 87.5x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $1.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $1.09B |
LTRX vs CIEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX) | 100 | 161.5 | +61.5% |
| Ciena Corporation (CIEN) | 100 | 974.0 | +874.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LTRX vs CIEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LTRX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 2.17
- Lower volatility, beta 2.17, Low D/E 28.4%, current ratio 2.54x
- Beta 2.17, current ratio 2.54x
CIEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 46.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- 32.3% 10Y total return vs LTRX's 425.2%
- 18.8% revenue growth vs LTRX's -23.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% revenue growth vs LTRX's -23.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (34.8x vs 87.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.5% margin vs LTRX's -5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.17 vs CIEN's 2.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.3% vs LTRX's +173.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs LTRX's -5.4%, ROIC 6.9% vs -10.5% |
LTRX vs CIEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LTRX vs CIEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.1B annually — 43.2x LTRX's $119M. CIEN is the more profitable business, keeping 4.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LTRX's -5.5%. On growth, CIEN holds the edge at +33.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $119M | $5.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $571M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $229M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $742M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.9% | +40.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +4.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | +33.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.9% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
LTRX leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $231M | $76.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $232M | $76.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -20.10x | 633.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.81x | 87.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 169.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.88x | 15.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.03x | 28.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.13x | 114.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CIEN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CIEN delivers a 8.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-9 for LTRX. LTRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIEN's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CIEN scores 8/9 vs LTRX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.8% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.5% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.0% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $490M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -48.12x | 3.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CIEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIEN five years ago would be worth $99,918 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,877 for LTRX. Over the past 12 months, CIEN leads with a +633.9% total return vs LTRX's +173.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIEN at 130.7% vs LTRX's 16.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.2% | +118.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +173.7% | +633.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.7% | +1127.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.8% | +899.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +425.2% | +3230.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.9% | +130.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LTRX and CIEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LTRX is the less volatile stock with a 2.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIEN's 2.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIEN currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs LTRX's 70.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.17x | 2.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.24 | $583.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.03 | $70.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.8% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 71.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 613K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LTRX as "Buy" and CIEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.5% upside for LTRX (target: $9) vs -37.9% for CIEN (target: $334).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.83 | $334.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
CIEN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LTRX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LTRX vs CIEN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LTRX or CIEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ciena Corporation (CIEN) is the stronger pick with 18.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 3% for Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX). Ciena Corporation (CIEN) offers the better valuation at 633. 2x trailing P/E (87. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LTRX or CIEN?
On forward P/E, Lantronix, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 34. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LTRX or CIEN?
Over the past 5 years, Ciena Corporation (CIEN) delivered a total return of +899.
2%, compared to +8. 8% for Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIEN returned +32. 3% versus LTRX's +425. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LTRX or CIEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lantronix, Inc.
(LTRX) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 17β versus Ciena Corporation's 2. 46β — meaning CIEN is approximately 14% more volatile than LTRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 58% for Ciena Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LTRX or CIEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ciena Corporation (CIEN) is pulling ahead at 18.
8% versus -23. 3% for Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ciena Corporation grew EPS 46. 6% year-over-year, compared to -141. 7% for Lantronix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIEN leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LTRX or CIEN?
Ciena Corporation (CIEN) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
6% net margin versus -9. 3% for Lantronix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIEN leads at 6. 5% versus -8. 9% for LTRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LTRX leads at 42. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LTRX or CIEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Lantronix, Inc.
(LTRX) trades at 34. 8x forward P/E versus 87. 5x for Ciena Corporation — 52. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LTRX: 51. 5% to $8. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — LTRX or CIEN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LTRX or CIEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lantronix, Inc.
(LTRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+425. 2% 10Y return). Ciena Corporation (CIEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 46 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LTRX: +425. 2%, CIEN: +32. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LTRX and CIEN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LTRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CIEN is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.