Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LTRX vs SIFY vs NTGR vs CALX vs SMSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Communication Equipment
Software - Application
Software - Application
LTRX vs SIFY vs NTGR vs CALX vs SMSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services | Communication Equipment | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $231M | $1.15B | $708M | $2.81B | $17M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $119M | $41.45B | $690M | $1.06B | $17M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-1.50B | $-40M | $34M | $-28M |
| Gross Margin | 42.9% | 34.2% | 37.5% | 57.1% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | -5.4% | 5.2% | -4.4% | 3.8% | -154.8% |
| Forward P/E | 34.8x | — | 129.4x | 24.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $21M | $39.51B | $51M | $26M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $5.00B | $210M | $143M | $1M |
LTRX vs SIFY vs NTGR vs CALX vs SMSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX) | 100 | 161.5 | +61.5% |
| Sify Technologies L… (SIFY) | 100 | 284.6 | +184.6% |
| NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR) | 100 | 100.6 | +0.6% |
| Calix, Inc. (CALX) | 100 | 308.7 | +208.7% |
| Smith Micro Softwar… (SMSI) | 100 | 2.5 | -97.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LTRX vs SIFY vs NTGR vs CALX vs SMSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LTRX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SIFY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +264.2% vs SMSI's -19.8%
Among these 5 stocks, NTGR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CALX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.3%, EPS growth 157.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs LTRX's 425.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 4.24x
- Beta 0.99, current ratio 4.24x
SMSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.48, yield 4.4%
- 4.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SIFY's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.3% revenue growth vs LTRX's -23.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs SMSI's -165.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs LTRX's 2.17, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SIFY's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +264.2% vs SMSI's -19.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.5% ROA vs SMSI's -104.4%, ROIC 2.1% vs -48.3% |
LTRX vs SIFY vs NTGR vs CALX vs SMSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LTRX vs SIFY vs NTGR vs CALX vs SMSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CALX leads in 2 of 6 categories
SIFY leads 1 • SMSI leads 1 • LTRX leads 0 • NTGR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CALX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIFY is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.4B annually — 2443.5x SMSI's $17M. CALX is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMSI's -165.4%. On growth, CALX holds the edge at +27.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $119M | $41.4B | $690M | $1.1B | $17M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $8.1B | -$19M | $57M | -$21M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$1.5B | -$40M | $34M | -$28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $0 | -$11M | $109M | -$10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.9% | +34.2% | +37.5% | +57.1% | +75.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | +5.2% | -4.4% | +3.8% | -154.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | -3.6% | -5.8% | +3.2% | -165.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | -9.2% | -1.6% | +10.3% | -61.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | +2.5% | -2.0% | +27.1% | -8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.9% | -3.7% | -123.8% | +3.3% | +64.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SIFY and CALX and SMSI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SIFY's 18.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CALX's 69.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $231M | $1.1B | $708M | $2.8B | $17M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $232M | $1.5B | $549M | $2.7B | $18M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -20.10x | -119.57x | -22.71x | 167.38x | -0.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.81x | — | 129.45x | 24.49x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.19x | — | 69.62x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.88x | 2.73x | 1.02x | 2.81x | 1.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.03x | 4.65x | 1.50x | 3.57x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.13x | — | — | 24.34x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CALX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CALX delivers a 4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-142 for SMSI. CALX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SIFY's 1.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CALX scores 6/9 vs SMSI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.8% | -7.7% | -8.0% | +4.2% | -141.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | -1.8% | -4.9% | +3.5% | -104.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.5% | +3.3% | -8.4% | +2.1% | -48.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.0% | +4.4% | -6.0% | +2.5% | -62.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 1.96x | 0.10x | 0.03x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $34.5B | -$159M | -$118M | $844,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $5.0B | $210M | $143M | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $39.5B | $51M | $26M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -48.12x | 0.82x | — | — | -7.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SIFY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LTRX five years ago would be worth $10,877 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $207 for SMSI. Over the past 12 months, SIFY leads with a +264.2% total return vs SMSI's -19.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SIFY at 28.8% vs SMSI's -56.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.2% | +29.2% | +6.5% | -18.8% | +53.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +173.7% | +264.2% | -9.7% | +3.3% | -19.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.7% | +113.4% | +86.5% | +2.1% | -91.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.8% | -12.1% | -33.0% | -9.3% | -97.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +425.2% | +141.0% | -37.7% | +513.0% | -96.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.9% | +28.8% | +23.1% | +0.7% | -56.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SIFY and CALX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CALX is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LTRX's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SIFY currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs CALX's 61.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.17x | 1.33x | 1.39x | 0.99x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.24 | $17.85 | $36.86 | $71.22 | $1.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.03 | $4.15 | $19.00 | $40.75 | $0.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.8% | +89.0% | +70.2% | +61.1% | +64.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 56.7 | 56.1 | 43.3 | 66.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 613K | 56K | 515K | 918K | 310K |
Analyst Outlook
SMSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LTRX as "Buy", SIFY as "Buy", NTGR as "Hold", CALX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.5% upside for LTRX (target: $9) vs 39.0% for NTGR (target: $36). SMSI is the only dividend payer here at 4.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.83 | — | $36.00 | $61.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 1 | 17 | 21 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | — | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.36 | — | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +7.2% | +3.3% | 0.0% |
CALX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SIFY leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
LTRX vs SIFY vs NTGR vs CALX vs SMSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LTRX or SIFY or NTGR or CALX or SMSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the stronger pick with 20. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 3% for Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX). Calix, Inc. (CALX) offers the better valuation at 167. 4x trailing P/E (24. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LTRX or SIFY or NTGR or CALX or SMSI?
On forward P/E, Calix, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 24. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LTRX or SIFY or NTGR or CALX or SMSI?
Over the past 5 years, Lantronix, Inc.
(LTRX) delivered a total return of +8. 8%, compared to -97. 9% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CALX returned +513. 0% versus SMSI's -96. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LTRX or SIFY or NTGR or CALX or SMSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Lantronix, Inc. 's 2. 17β — meaning LTRX is approximately 118% more volatile than CALX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calix, Inc. (CALX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 196% for Sify Technologies Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LTRX or SIFY or NTGR or CALX or SMSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is pulling ahead at 20. 3% versus -23. 3% for Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calix, Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -877. 8% for Sify Technologies Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SIFY leads at 13. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LTRX or SIFY or NTGR or CALX or SMSI?
Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 8% net margin versus -173. 3% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIFY leads at 5. 7% versus -110. 8% for SMSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMSI leads at 74. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LTRX or SIFY or NTGR or CALX or SMSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) trades at 24. 5x forward P/E versus 129. 4x for NETGEAR, Inc. — 105. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LTRX: 51. 5% to $8. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — LTRX or SIFY or NTGR or CALX or SMSI?
In this comparison, SMSI (4.
4% yield) pays a dividend. LTRX, SIFY, NTGR, CALX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LTRX or SIFY or NTGR or CALX or SMSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +513. 0% 10Y return). Lantronix, Inc. (LTRX) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CALX: +513. 0%, LTRX: +425. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LTRX and SIFY and NTGR and CALX and SMSI?
These companies operate in different sectors (LTRX (Technology) and SIFY (Communication Services) and NTGR (Technology) and CALX (Technology) and SMSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LTRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SIFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CALX is a small-cap high-growth stock; SMSI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. SMSI pays a dividend while LTRX, SIFY, NTGR, CALX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.