Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LU vs BABA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LU
Lufax Holding Ltd

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNYSE • CN
Market Cap$847M
5Y Perf.-96.1%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$341.64B
5Y Perf.-53.6%

LU vs BABA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LU logoLU
BABA logoBABA
IndustryFinancial - Credit ServicesSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$847M$341.64B
Revenue (TTM)$28.13B$1.01T
Net Income (TTM)$-3.38B$123.35B
Gross Margin74.9%41.2%
Operating Margin-1.6%10.9%
Forward P/E4.1x
Total Debt$81.47B$248.49B
Cash & Equiv.$41.15B$181.73B

LU vs BABALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LU
BABA
StockOct 20May 26Return
Lufax Holding Ltd (LU)1003.9-96.1%
Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA)10046.4-53.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LU vs BABA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BABA leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Lufax Holding Ltd is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LU
Lufax Holding Ltd
The Banking Pick

LU is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
The Income Pick

BABA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 1.3%
  • Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 70.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
  • 84.5% 10Y total return vs LU's -86.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBABA logoBABA5.9% revenue growth vs LU's -32.5%
ValueLU logoLUBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBABA logoBABA12.2% margin vs LU's -7.3%
Stability / SafetyBABA logoBABABeta 1.21 vs LU's 1.62, lower leverage
DividendsBABA logoBABA1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BABA logoBABA+12.4% vs LU's -30.8%
Efficiency (ROA)BABA logoBABA6.7% ROA vs LU's -1.5%, ROIC 9.6% vs -0.2%

LU vs BABA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LULufax Holding Ltd

Segment breakdown not available.

BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited
FY 2025
Customer Management Services
42.6%$424.9B
Sales Of Goods
27.5%$274.3B
Logistics Services
12.4%$123.4B
Cloud Services
8.5%$84.5B
Membership Fees and Value Added Services
4.7%$46.6B
Product and Service, Other
4.3%$42.7B

LU vs BABA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBABALAGGINGLU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 36.0x LU's $28.1B. BABA is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LU's -7.3%.

MetricLU logoLULufax Holding LtdBABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$28.1B$1.01T
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1.3B$114.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$3.4B$123.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$8.6B$2.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+74.9%+41.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-1.6%+10.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.3%+12.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+45.3%+0.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-10.6%-52.0%
BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LU leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricLU logoLULufax Holding LtdBABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
Market CapShares × price$847M$341.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.8B$351.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.89x17.99x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.4.14x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.62x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.21x2.34x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.07x2.13x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.45x29.80x
LU leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BABA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

BABA delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-4 for LU. BABA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LU's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs LU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLU logoLULufax Holding LtdBABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.8%+11.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.5%+6.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.2%+9.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.2%+10.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.99x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$40.3B$66.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$41.1B$181.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$81.5B$248.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.12x15.74x
BABA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BABA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BABA five years ago would be worth $6,453 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,428 for LU. Over the past 12 months, BABA leads with a +12.4% total return vs LU's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 20.6% vs LU's -12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLU logoLULufax Holding LtdBABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-24.9%-9.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-30.8%+12.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-33.5%+75.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.7%-35.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.8%+84.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-12.7%+20.6%
BABA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

BABA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

BABA is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LU's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BABA currently trades 73.4% from its 52-week high vs LU's 44.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLU logoLULufax Holding LtdBABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.62x1.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.57$192.67
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.73$103.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+44.2%+73.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.549.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M10.3M
BABA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BABA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates LU as "Buy" and BABA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 72.3% upside for LU (target: $3) vs 37.3% for BABA (target: $194). BABA is the only dividend payer here at 1.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricLU logoLULufax Holding LtdBABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.48$194.23
# AnalystsCovering analysts1359
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises02
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$12.14
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.8%
BABA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BABA leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallAlibaba Group Holding Limit… (BABA)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LU vs BABA: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LU or BABA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the stronger pick with 5.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 5% for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (4. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — LU or BABA?

Over the past 5 years, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) delivered a total return of -35.

5%, compared to -85. 7% for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BABA returned +84. 5% versus LU's -86. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — LU or BABA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

21β versus Lufax Holding Ltd's 1. 62β — meaning LU is approximately 34% more volatile than BABA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 99% for Lufax Holding Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — LU or BABA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is pulling ahead at 5.

9% versus -32. 5% for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alibaba Group Holding Limited grew EPS 70. 9% year-over-year, compared to -254. 5% for Lufax Holding Ltd. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — LU or BABA?

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

1% net margin versus -7. 3% for Lufax Holding Ltd — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BABA leads at 14. 1% versus -1. 6% for LU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LU leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is LU or BABA more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LU: 72.

3% to $3. 48.

07

Which pays a better dividend — LU or BABA?

In this comparison, BABA (1.

3% yield) pays a dividend. LU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is LU or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

21), 1. 3% yield). Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BABA: +84. 5%, LU: -86. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between LU and BABA?

These companies operate in different sectors (LU (Financial Services) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock. BABA pays a dividend while LU does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

LU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BABA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LU and BABA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LU: -32.5% · BABA: 4.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.