Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LU vs BABA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
LU vs BABA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $847M | $341.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28.13B | $1.01T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.38B | $123.35B |
| Gross Margin | 74.9% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | 10.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.1x |
| Total Debt | $81.47B | $248.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41.15B | $181.73B |
LU vs BABA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) | 100 | 3.9 | -96.1% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 46.4 | -53.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LU vs BABA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LU is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
BABA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 70.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 84.5% 10Y total return vs LU's -86.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.9% revenue growth vs LU's -32.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs LU's -7.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs LU's 1.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.4% vs LU's -30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs LU's -1.5%, ROIC 9.6% vs -0.2% |
LU vs BABA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LU vs BABA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 36.0x LU's $28.1B. BABA is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LU's -7.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28.1B | $1.01T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.3B | $114.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.4B | $123.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8.6B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.9% | +41.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | +10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.3% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +45.3% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.6% | -52.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LU leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $847M | $341.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.8B | $351.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.89x | 17.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.21x | 2.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.07x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.45x | 29.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BABA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BABA delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-4 for LU. BABA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LU's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs LU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.8% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.5% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40.3B | $66.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41.1B | $181.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $81.5B | $248.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.12x | 15.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BABA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BABA five years ago would be worth $6,453 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,428 for LU. Over the past 12 months, BABA leads with a +12.4% total return vs LU's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 20.6% vs LU's -12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.9% | -9.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.8% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.5% | +75.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.7% | -35.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.8% | +84.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.7% | +20.6% |
Risk & Volatility
BABA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BABA is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LU's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BABA currently trades 73.4% from its 52-week high vs LU's 44.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.62x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.57 | $192.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.73 | $103.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.2% | +73.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.5 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 10.3M |
Analyst Outlook
BABA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LU as "Buy" and BABA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 72.3% upside for LU (target: $3) vs 37.3% for BABA (target: $194). BABA is the only dividend payer here at 1.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.48 | $194.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $12.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.8% |
BABA leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
LU vs BABA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LU or BABA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the stronger pick with 5.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 5% for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (4. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LU or BABA?
Over the past 5 years, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) delivered a total return of -35.
5%, compared to -85. 7% for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BABA returned +84. 5% versus LU's -86. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LU or BABA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
21β versus Lufax Holding Ltd's 1. 62β — meaning LU is approximately 34% more volatile than BABA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 99% for Lufax Holding Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LU or BABA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is pulling ahead at 5.
9% versus -32. 5% for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alibaba Group Holding Limited grew EPS 70. 9% year-over-year, compared to -254. 5% for Lufax Holding Ltd. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LU or BABA?
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
1% net margin versus -7. 3% for Lufax Holding Ltd — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BABA leads at 14. 1% versus -1. 6% for LU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LU leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LU or BABA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LU: 72.
3% to $3. 48.
07Which pays a better dividend — LU or BABA?
In this comparison, BABA (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. LU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is LU or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
21), 1. 3% yield). Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BABA: +84. 5%, LU: -86. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LU and BABA?
These companies operate in different sectors (LU (Financial Services) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock. BABA pays a dividend while LU does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.