Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LUNG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MMSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
LUNG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MMSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $54M | $1.41B | $1.92B | $3.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $552M | $674M | $1.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-54M | $-5M | $-173M | $139M |
| Gross Margin | 74.2% | 75.5% | 75.2% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | -59.3% | -0.4% | -27.2% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 370.7x | — | 15.5x |
| Total Debt | $56M | $88M | $290M | $898M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $167M | $103M | $449M |
LUNG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MMSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG) | 100 | 3.0 | -97.0% |
| AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) | 100 | 80.4 | -19.6% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 13.8 | -86.2% |
| Merit Medical Syste… (MMSI) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LUNG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MMSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LUNG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ATRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 74.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- 14.9% revenue growth vs LUNG's 8.0%
NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +1.1% vs LUNG's -65.5%
MMSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.71
- 214.6% 10Y total return vs ATRC's 95.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 56.7%, current ratio 4.34x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 4.34x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.9% revenue growth vs LUNG's 8.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.0% margin vs LUNG's -59.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs LUNG's 2.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.1% vs LUNG's -65.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs LUNG's -38.2%, ROIC 7.2% vs -72.0% |
LUNG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MMSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LUNG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MMSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MMSI leads in 3 of 6 categories
LUNG leads 0 • ATRC leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ATRC and MMSI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 17.0x LUNG's $90M. MMSI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LUNG's -59.7%. On growth, ATRC holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $552M | $674M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$53M | $13M | -$165M | $290M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$54M | -$5M | -$173M | $139M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$33M | $54M | -$48M | $274M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.2% | +75.5% | +75.2% | +48.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -59.3% | -0.4% | -27.2% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -59.7% | -0.8% | -25.7% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -36.3% | +9.7% | -7.1% | +17.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.9% | +14.3% | +12.3% | +7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.2% | +101.6% | -100.0% | +38.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MMSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MMSI's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 77.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $54M | $1.4B | $1.9B | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $40M | $1.3B | $2.1B | $4.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.95x | -115.83x | -13.80x | 29.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 370.67x | — | 15.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 77.75x | — | 13.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.59x | 2.63x | 2.92x | 2.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 2.70x | 5.51x | 2.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.15x | — | 17.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MMSI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MMSI delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-83 for LUNG. ATRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LUNG's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMSI scores 6/9 vs LUNG's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -82.8% | -1.0% | -50.8% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.2% | -0.7% | -16.5% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -72.0% | -0.6% | -16.4% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -43.3% | -0.6% | -28.9% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.04x | 0.18x | 0.85x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$14M | -$79M | $187M | $450M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $167M | $103M | $449M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $88M | $290M | $898M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -16.55x | 0.47x | -96.80x | 10.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MMSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMSI five years ago would be worth $9,644 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $298 for LUNG. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +1.1% total return vs LUNG's -65.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MMSI at -9.8% vs LUNG's -53.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.8% | -29.2% | +28.3% | -27.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -65.5% | -8.3% | +1.1% | -33.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.8% | -41.8% | -75.7% | -26.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.0% | -64.2% | -91.3% | -3.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | +95.1% | +30.3% | +214.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -53.3% | -16.5% | -37.6% | -9.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVCR and MMSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MMSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUNG's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs LUNG's 32.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.36x | 1.03x | 2.20x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.88 | $43.18 | $20.06 | $100.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.13 | $26.62 | $9.82 | $59.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.7% | +64.4% | +83.9% | +62.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 45.0 | 69.8 | 34.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 567K | 669K | 1.5M | 769K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ATRC as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", MMSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 52.4% for MMSI (target: $95).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $50.67 | $33.50 | $95.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | 15 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MMSI leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
LUNG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MMSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is the stronger pick with 14. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG). Merit Medical Systems, Inc. (MMSI) offers the better valuation at 29. 3x trailing P/E (15. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI?
On forward P/E, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 15. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI?
Over the past 5 years, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) delivered a total return of -3. 6%, compared to -97. 0% for Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMSI returned +214. 6% versus LUNG's -96. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Pulmonx Corporation's 2. 36β — meaning LUNG is approximately 231% more volatile than MMSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 104% for Pulmonx Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is pulling ahead at 14. 9% versus 8. 0% for Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AtriCure, Inc. grew EPS 74. 7% year-over-year, compared to 4. 9% for Merit Medical Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LUNG leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI?
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 5% net margin versus -59. 7% for Pulmonx Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MMSI leads at 12. 2% versus -59. 3% for LUNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) trades at 15. 5x forward P/E versus 370. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 355. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +214. 6% 10Y return). Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MMSI: +214. 6%, LUNG: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LUNG and ATRC and NVCR and MMSI?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.