Auto - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LVWR vs TSLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
LVWR vs TSLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $356M | $1.50T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28M | $97.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-74M | $3.88B |
| Gross Margin | -10.0% | 19.1% |
| Operating Margin | -258.5% | 5.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 206.1x |
| Total Debt | $76M | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $83M | $16.51B |
LVWR vs TSLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveWire Group, Inc. (LVWR) | 100 | 17.6 | -82.4% |
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | 100 | 210.6 | +110.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LVWR vs TSLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LVWR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +51.3% vs TSLA's +44.7%
TSLA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.06
- Rev growth -2.9%, EPS growth -47.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- 26.8% 10Y total return vs LVWR's -82.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.9% revenue growth vs LVWR's -3.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.0% margin vs LVWR's -263.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.06 vs LVWR's 2.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.3% vs TSLA's +44.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.9% ROA vs LVWR's -62.6%, ROIC 4.5% vs -124.8% |
LVWR vs TSLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LVWR vs TSLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSLA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSLA is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.9B annually — 3490.2x LVWR's $28M. TSLA is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LVWR's -2.6%. On growth, LVWR holds the edge at +86.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28M | $97.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$63M | $9.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$74M | $3.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$53M | $7.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -10.0% | +19.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +5.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -188.8% | +7.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +86.5% | +15.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
LVWR leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $356M | $1.50T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $349M | $1.49T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.70x | 369.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 206.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 141.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 13.88x | 15.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.70x | 16.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 240.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLA delivers a 4.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-137 for LVWR. TSLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LVWR's 1.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSLA scores 6/9 vs LVWR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -137.1% | +4.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -62.6% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -124.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -62.4% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.65x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $83M | $16.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $76M | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -284.36x | 17.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSLA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TSLA five years ago would be worth $18,019 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,772 for LVWR. Over the past 12 months, LVWR leads with a +51.3% total return vs TSLA's +44.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSLA at 32.4% vs LVWR's -38.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -61.8% | -9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +51.3% | +44.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.8% | +132.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.3% | +80.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.0% | +2681.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.6% | +32.4% |
Risk & Volatility
TSLA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TSLA is the less volatile stock with a 2.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LVWR's 2.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSLA currently trades 79.9% from its 52-week high vs LVWR's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.47x | 2.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.04 | $498.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.93 | $271.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.2% | +79.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.4 | 54.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 274K | 61.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LVWR as "Hold" and TSLA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 331.0% upside for LVWR (target: $8) vs 13.0% for TSLA (target: $450).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.50 | $450.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% |
TSLA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LVWR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
LVWR vs TSLA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LVWR or TSLA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) is the stronger pick with -2. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for LiveWire Group, Inc. (LVWR). Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) offers the better valuation at 369. 0x trailing P/E (206. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LiveWire Group, Inc. (LVWR) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LVWR or TSLA?
Over the past 5 years, Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) delivered a total return of +80. 2%, compared to -82. 3% for LiveWire Group, Inc. (LVWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSLA returned +26. 8% versus LVWR's -82. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LVWR or TSLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 06β versus LiveWire Group, Inc. 's 2. 47β — meaning LVWR is approximately 20% more volatile than TSLA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 165% for LiveWire Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LVWR or TSLA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) is pulling ahead at -2. 9% versus -3. 6% for LiveWire Group, Inc. (LVWR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LiveWire Group, Inc. grew EPS 19. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Tesla, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TSLA leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LVWR or TSLA?
Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 0% net margin versus -292. 6% for LiveWire Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSLA leads at 4. 6% versus -294. 0% for LVWR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSLA leads at 18. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LVWR or TSLA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LVWR: 331.
0% to $7. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — LVWR or TSLA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is LVWR or TSLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. LiveWire Group, Inc. (LVWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 47 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TSLA: +26. 8%, LVWR: -82. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LVWR and TSLA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare TSLA vs GM
GM is one of the most direct listed alternatives to TSLA.
Compare LVWR vs HOG
HOG overlaps with LVWR in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With RIVN + LCID
RIVN and LCID are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.