Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LWAY vs WMT vs KR vs SYY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Grocery Stores
Food Distribution
LWAY vs WMT vs KR vs SYY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Specialty Retail | Grocery Stores | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $391M | $1.04T | $42.03B | $34.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $212M | $703.06B | $147.64B | $83.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $22.91B | $1.02B | $1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 24.9% | 22.3% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 4.1% | 1.3% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | 20.7x | 44.7x | 12.7x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $360K | $67.09B | $24.68B | $14.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $10.73B | $3.33B | $1.07B |
LWAY vs WMT vs KR vs SYY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lifeway Foods, Inc. (LWAY) | 100 | 1081.9 | +981.9% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 203.6 | +103.6% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 132.1 | +32.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LWAY vs WMT vs KR vs SYY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LWAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.7%, EPS growth 50.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
- 13.7% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4%
- 6.5% margin vs KR's 0.7%
- 13.6% ROA vs KR's 2.0%, ROIC 17.8% vs 5.0%
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs LWAY's 167.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.12 vs LWAY's 0.72
- +32.7% vs KR's -6.4%
KR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 44.7x)
SYY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 2.8%
- PEG 0.29 vs WMT's 4.06
- Beta 0.47, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.21x
- 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs KR's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 44.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs KR's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs LWAY's 0.72 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs KR's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs KR's -6.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.6% ROA vs KR's 2.0%, ROIC 17.8% vs 5.0% |
LWAY vs WMT vs KR vs SYY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LWAY vs WMT vs KR vs SYY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LWAY leads in 2 of 6 categories
KR leads 1 • SYY leads 1 • WMT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LWAY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 3308.6x LWAY's $212M. LWAY is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KR's 0.7%. On growth, LWAY holds the edge at +18.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $212M | $703.1B | $147.6B | $83.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | $42.8B | $5.5B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $22.9B | $1.0B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $15.3B | $3.5B | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +24.9% | +22.3% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +4.1% | +1.3% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +3.3% | +0.7% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | +2.2% | +2.4% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.0% | +5.8% | +1.2% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.8% | +35.1% | +50.0% | -13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
KR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, SYY trades at a 59% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.36x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $391M | $1.04T | $42.0B | $34.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $385M | $1.09T | $63.4B | $48.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.81x | 47.69x | 43.12x | 19.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.68x | 44.71x | 12.68x | 15.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.86x | 4.33x | — | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.12x | 24.85x | 10.91x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.84x | 1.46x | 0.28x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.64x | 10.45x | 7.33x | 19.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.97x | 12.55x | 19.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LWAY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $13 for KR. LWAY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs LWAY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.2% | +22.3% | +13.0% | +80.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.6% | +7.9% | +2.0% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.8% | +14.7% | +5.0% | +15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.7% | +17.5% | +5.5% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.67x | 4.16x | 7.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $56.4B | $21.3B | $13.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $10.7B | $3.3B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $360,000 | $67.1B | $24.7B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 256.99x | 11.85x | 2.59x | 4.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LWAY and WMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LWAY five years ago would be worth $52,703 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,614 for SYY. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs KR's -6.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LWAY at 62.3% vs SYY's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.5% | +15.7% | +6.0% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.1% | +32.7% | -6.4% | +6.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +327.3% | +160.5% | +42.7% | +4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +427.0% | +186.9% | +90.7% | -3.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.1% | +499.5% | +108.7% | +82.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.3% | +37.6% | +12.6% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMT and KR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LWAY's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs LWAY's 75.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.12x | -0.64x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.20 | $134.69 | $76.58 | $91.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.31 | $91.89 | $58.60 | $68.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.0% | +96.7% | +86.7% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.8 | 55.9 | 39.2 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 63K | 17.2M | 5.6M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LWAY as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", KR as "Buy", SYY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.5% upside for LWAY (target: $35) vs 5.3% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, SYY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $137.04 | $74.75 | $90.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 64 | 44 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +2.0% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 37 | 21 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | $1.35 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +6.4% | +3.6% |
LWAY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LWAY vs WMT vs KR vs SYY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LWAY or WMT or KR or SYY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lifeway Foods, Inc.
(LWAY) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). Sysco Corporation (SYY) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lifeway Foods, Inc. (LWAY) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LWAY or WMT or KR or SYY?
On trailing P/E, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the cheapest at 19.
5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, The Kroger Co. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LWAY or WMT or KR or SYY?
Over the past 5 years, Lifeway Foods, Inc.
(LWAY) delivered a total return of +427. 0%, compared to -3. 9% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus SYY's +82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LWAY or WMT or KR or SYY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 64β versus Lifeway Foods, Inc. 's 0. 72β — meaning LWAY is approximately -213% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lifeway Foods, Inc. (LWAY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LWAY or WMT or KR or SYY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lifeway Foods, Inc.
(LWAY) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lifeway Foods, Inc. grew EPS 50. 8% year-over-year, compared to -58. 0% for The Kroger Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LWAY leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LWAY or WMT or KR or SYY?
Lifeway Foods, Inc.
(LWAY) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus 0. 7% for The Kroger Co. — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LWAY leads at 7. 6% versus 1. 3% for KR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LWAY leads at 27. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LWAY or WMT or KR or SYY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Kroger Co. (KR) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 32. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LWAY: 36. 5% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LWAY or WMT or KR or SYY?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield), KR (2. 0% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. LWAY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LWAY or WMT or KR or SYY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 64), 2. 0% yield, +108. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +108. 7%, LWAY: +167. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LWAY and WMT and KR and SYY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WMT, KR, SYY pay a dividend while LWAY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.