Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LXEH vs DAO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
LXEH vs DAO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $1M | $375M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $84M | $5.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-151M | $107M |
| Gross Margin | 1.9% | 44.3% |
| Operating Margin | -160.6% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.3x |
| Total Debt | $132M | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $221M | $440M |
LXEH vs DAO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lixiang Education H… (LXEH) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Youdao, Inc. (DAO) | 100 | 47.6 | -52.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LXEH vs DAO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LXEH is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.92, Low D/E 90.4%, current ratio 2.10x
- Beta -0.92, current ratio 2.10x
DAO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth -100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- -4.0% 10Y total return vs LXEH's -99.8%
- 3.6% revenue growth vs LXEH's -35.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs LXEH's -35.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.8% margin vs LXEH's -179.3% | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.6% vs LXEH's -96.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs LXEH's -31.3% |
LXEH vs DAO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LXEH vs DAO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 69.8x LXEH's $84M. DAO is the more profitable business, keeping 1.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LXEH's -179.3%. On growth, DAO holds the edge at +15.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $84M | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$121M | $193M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$151M | $107M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$61M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +44.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -160.6% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -179.3% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -72.7% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.7% | +15.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +87.0% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LXEH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $375M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$12M | $579M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.39x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DAO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DAO scores 5/9 vs LXEH's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -83.5% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.3% | +5.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -60.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.5% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.90x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$89M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $221M | $440M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $132M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.28x | 3.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DAO five years ago would be worth $5,249 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12 for LXEH. Over the past 12 months, DAO leads with a +35.6% total return vs LXEH's -96.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAO at 21.4% vs LXEH's -80.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.0% | +7.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.1% | +35.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +79.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -47.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -4.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.2% | +21.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LXEH and DAO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LXEH is the less volatile stock with a -0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DAO's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAO currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs LXEH's 3.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.92x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.00 | $12.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.19 | $8.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.6% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.0 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 128K | 66K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DAO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LXEH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LXEH vs DAO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LXEH or DAO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Youdao, Inc.
(DAO) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 5% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). Analysts rate Youdao, Inc. (DAO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LXEH or DAO?
Over the past 5 years, Youdao, Inc.
(DAO) delivered a total return of -47. 5%, compared to -99. 9% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DAO returned -4. 0% versus LXEH's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LXEH or DAO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lixiang Education Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LXEH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 92β versus Youdao, Inc. 's 0. 78β — meaning DAO is approximately -185% more volatile than LXEH relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LXEH or DAO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Youdao, Inc.
(DAO) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -35. 5% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 84. 0% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Youdao, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DAO leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LXEH or DAO?
Youdao, Inc.
(DAO) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 8% net margin versus -75. 1% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 1. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DAO leads at 3. 7% versus -79. 1% for LXEH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DAO leads at 44. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LXEH or DAO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LXEH or DAO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lixiang Education Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LXEH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 92)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LXEH: -99. 8%, DAO: -4. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LXEH and DAO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.