Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LXFR vs MTRN vs MP vs KALU vs CENX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LXFR
Luxfer Holdings PLC

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$415M
5Y Perf.+9.7%
MTRN
Materion Corporation

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.97B
5Y Perf.+210.7%
MP
MP Materials Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.28B
5Y Perf.+593.4%
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation

Aluminum

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.86B
5Y Perf.+139.3%
CENX
Century Aluminum Company

Aluminum

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.00B
5Y Perf.+749.6%

LXFR vs MTRN vs MP vs KALU vs CENX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LXFR logoLXFR
MTRN logoMTRN
MP logoMP
KALU logoKALU
CENX logoCENX
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryIndustrial MaterialsIndustrial MaterialsAluminumAluminum
Market Cap$415M$3.97B$12.28B$2.86B$6.00B
Revenue (TTM)$372M$1.92B$305M$3.70B$2.54B
Net Income (TTM)$29M$76M$-71M$153M$350M
Gross Margin24.1%15.8%8.3%10.2%12.7%
Operating Margin6.1%6.1%-36.4%6.6%19.4%
Forward P/E12.9x30.0x274.3x18.7x5.8x
Total Debt$39M$601M$1.04B$1.12B$548M
Cash & Equiv.$8M$14M$1.17B$7M$136M

LXFR vs MTRN vs MP vs KALU vs CENXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LXFR
MTRN
MP
KALU
CENX
StockJun 20May 26Return
Luxfer Holdings PLC (LXFR)100109.7+9.7%
Materion Corporation (MTRN)100310.7+210.7%
MP Materials Corp. (MP)100693.4+593.4%
Kaiser Aluminum Cor… (KALU)100239.3+139.3%
Century Aluminum Co… (CENX)100849.6+749.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LXFR vs MTRN vs MP vs KALU vs CENX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CENX leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Luxfer Holdings PLC is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. MP and KALU also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LXFR
Luxfer Holdings PLC
The Income Pick

LXFR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.37, yield 3.3%
  • Beta 1.37, yield 3.3%, current ratio 1.67x
  • Beta 1.37 vs CENX's 1.74, lower leverage
  • 3.3% yield, vs MTRN's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
MTRN
Materion Corporation
The Growth Play

MTRN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 11.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
Best for: growth exposure
MP
MP Materials Corp.
The Defensive Pick

MP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 43.6%, current ratio 7.24x
  • 35.1% revenue growth vs LXFR's -1.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation
The Value Pick

KALU is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.62 vs LXFR's 1.32
  • Lower P/E (18.7x vs 274.3x)
Best for: valuation efficiency
CENX
Century Aluminum Company
The Long-Run Compounder

CENX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 7.9% 10Y total return vs MTRN's 7.2%
  • 13.7% margin vs MP's -23.3%
  • +282.9% vs LXFR's +43.7%
  • 15.5% ROA vs MP's -2.0%, ROIC 9.5% vs -4.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMP logoMP35.1% revenue growth vs LXFR's -1.9%
ValueKALU logoKALULower P/E (18.7x vs 274.3x)
Quality / MarginsCENX logoCENX13.7% margin vs MP's -23.3%
Stability / SafetyLXFR logoLXFRBeta 1.37 vs CENX's 1.74, lower leverage
DividendsLXFR logoLXFR3.3% yield, vs MTRN's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CENX logoCENX+282.9% vs LXFR's +43.7%
Efficiency (ROA)CENX logoCENX15.5% ROA vs MP's -2.0%, ROIC 9.5% vs -4.7%

LXFR vs MTRN vs MP vs KALU vs CENX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LXFRLuxfer Holdings PLC
FY 2025
Transportation
100.0%$107M
MTRNMaterion Corporation
FY 2025
Semiconductor
54.4%$868M
Aerospace and Defense
13.4%$214M
Consumer Electronics
10.6%$169M
Energy
7.8%$124M
Other End Market
6.0%$96M
Automotive Electronics
4.8%$77M
Life Sciences
2.9%$47M
MPMP Materials Corp.
FY 2024
Materials Segment
100.0%$204M
KALUKaiser Aluminum Corporation
FY 2025
Packaging
44.2%$1.5B
Aero Hs Products
24.8%$838M
Ge Products
22.5%$759M
Automotive Extrusions
8.5%$286M
CENXCentury Aluminum Company
FY 2025
Aluminum
88.8%$2.2B
Alumina
11.2%$284M

LXFR vs MTRN vs MP vs KALU vs CENX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCENXLAGGINGMP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CENX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KALU is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 12.1x MP's $305M. CENX is the more profitable business, keeping 13.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MP's -23.3%. On growth, MP holds the edge at +49.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLXFR logoLXFRLuxfer Holdings P…MTRN logoMTRNMaterion Corporat…MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.KALU logoKALUKaiser Aluminum C…CENX logoCENXCentury Aluminum …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$372M$1.9B$305M$3.7B$2.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$29M$187M-$43M$368M$565M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$29M$76M-$71M$153M$350M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$16M$7M-$314M$24M$27M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.1%+15.8%+8.3%+10.2%+12.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.1%+6.1%-36.4%+6.6%+19.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.9%+4.0%-23.3%+4.1%+13.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.3%+0.4%-102.8%+0.7%+1.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-13.5%+30.8%+49.1%+42.4%+2.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-35.0%+8.2%+121.4%+183.2%+10.1%
CENX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KALU leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 13.5x trailing earnings, LXFR trades at a 91% valuation discount to CENX's 144.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KALU offers better value at 0.86x vs MTRN's 1.45x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLXFR logoLXFRLuxfer Holdings P…MTRN logoMTRNMaterion Corporat…MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.KALU logoKALUKaiser Aluminum C…CENX logoCENXCentury Aluminum …
Market CapShares × price$415M$4.0B$12.3B$2.9B$6.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$446M$4.6B$12.2B$4.0B$6.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.50x53.37x-138.26x26.02x144.24x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.93x29.96x274.33x18.74x5.80x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.37x1.45x0.86x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.16x24.67x12.68x25.64x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.08x2.22x44.59x0.85x2.37x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.86x4.24x4.92x3.54x6.14x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.85x79.54x70.71x
KALU leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CENX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

CENX delivers a 38.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-4 for MP. LXFR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KALU's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LXFR scores 7/9 vs MP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLXFR logoLXFRLuxfer Holdings P…MTRN logoMTRNMaterion Corporat…MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.KALU logoKALUKaiser Aluminum C…CENX logoCENXCentury Aluminum …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.8%+8.2%-3.7%+18.7%+38.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.6%+4.2%-2.0%+5.9%+15.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.8%+6.0%-4.7%+7.8%+9.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.6%+7.7%-4.2%+9.4%+9.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975467
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.17x0.64x0.44x1.36x0.58x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$31M$587M-$123M$1.1B$413M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$14M$1.2B$7M$136M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$39M$601M$1.0B$1.1B$548M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense10.69x4.07x-2.80x4.84x0.82x
CENX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CENX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CENX five years ago would be worth $38,318 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,872 for LXFR. Over the past 12 months, CENX leads with a +282.9% total return vs LXFR's +43.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CENX at 92.7% vs LXFR's 4.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLXFR logoLXFRLuxfer Holdings P…MTRN logoMTRNMaterion Corporat…MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.KALU logoKALUKaiser Aluminum C…CENX logoCENXCentury Aluminum …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+16.0%+48.8%+25.8%+47.7%+48.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+43.7%+163.9%+192.7%+169.4%+282.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+14.1%+84.9%+221.7%+193.5%+616.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-21.3%+155.6%+149.7%+40.7%+283.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+68.9%+724.3%+591.3%+135.1%+794.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+4.5%+22.7%+47.6%+43.2%+92.7%
CENX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LXFR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LXFR is the less volatile stock with a 1.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CENX's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LXFR currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs MP's 69.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLXFR logoLXFRLuxfer Holdings P…MTRN logoMTRNMaterion Corporat…MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.KALU logoKALUKaiser Aluminum C…CENX logoCENXCentury Aluminum …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.37x1.62x1.40x1.71x1.74x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$16.03$201.88$100.25$183.00$68.69
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.96$70.94$18.64$65.69$14.77
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.8%+94.6%+69.0%+96.3%+88.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10077.971.066.874.256.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded219K232K5.6M248K1.9M
LXFR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — LXFR and MTRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LXFR as "Buy", MTRN as "Buy", MP as "Buy", KALU as "Hold", CENX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.5% upside for CENX (target: $76) vs -15.7% for MTRN (target: $161). For income investors, LXFR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.30% vs MTRN's 0.29%.

MetricLXFR logoLXFRLuxfer Holdings P…MTRN logoMTRNMaterion Corporat…MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.KALU logoKALUKaiser Aluminum C…CENX logoCENXCentury Aluminum …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$161.00$78.25$160.00$76.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts910112222
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.3%+0.3%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01301
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.51$0.55$3.09
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.7%+0.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — LXFR and MTRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CENX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KALU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallCentury Aluminum Company (CENX)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LXFR vs MTRN vs MP vs KALU vs CENX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LXFR or MTRN or MP or KALU or CENX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the stronger pick with 35. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for Luxfer Holdings PLC (LXFR). Luxfer Holdings PLC (LXFR) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Luxfer Holdings PLC (LXFR) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LXFR or MTRN or MP or KALU or CENX?

On trailing P/E, Luxfer Holdings PLC (LXFR) is the cheapest at 13.

5x versus Century Aluminum Company at 144. 2x. On forward P/E, Century Aluminum Company is actually cheaper at 5. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Kaiser Aluminum Corporation wins at 0. 62x versus Luxfer Holdings PLC's 1. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LXFR or MTRN or MP or KALU or CENX?

Over the past 5 years, Century Aluminum Company (CENX) delivered a total return of +283.

2%, compared to -21. 3% for Luxfer Holdings PLC (LXFR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CENX returned +794. 8% versus LXFR's +68. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LXFR or MTRN or MP or KALU or CENX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Luxfer Holdings PLC (LXFR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

37β versus Century Aluminum Company's 1. 74β — meaning CENX is approximately 27% more volatile than LXFR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Luxfer Holdings PLC (LXFR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 136% for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LXFR or MTRN or MP or KALU or CENX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is pulling ahead at 35. 1% versus -1. 9% for Luxfer Holdings PLC (LXFR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Materion Corporation grew EPS 1179% year-over-year, compared to -87. 2% for Century Aluminum Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTRN leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LXFR or MTRN or MP or KALU or CENX?

Luxfer Holdings PLC (LXFR) is the more profitable company, earning 8.

1% net margin versus -31. 2% for MP Materials Corp. — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTRN leads at 6. 5% versus -44. 6% for MP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LXFR leads at 23. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LXFR or MTRN or MP or KALU or CENX more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Luxfer Holdings PLC's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Century Aluminum Company (CENX) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 274. 3x for MP Materials Corp. — 268. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CENX: 25. 5% to $76. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LXFR or MTRN or MP or KALU or CENX?

In this comparison, LXFR (3.

3% yield), KALU (1. 8% yield), MTRN (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. MP, CENX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LXFR or MTRN or MP or KALU or CENX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Luxfer Holdings PLC (LXFR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3.

3% yield). Century Aluminum Company (CENX) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LXFR: +68. 9%, CENX: +794. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LXFR and MTRN and MP and KALU and CENX?

These companies operate in different sectors (LXFR (Industrials) and MTRN (Basic Materials) and MP (Basic Materials) and KALU (Basic Materials) and CENX (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LXFR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MTRN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KALU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CENX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LXFR, KALU pay a dividend while MTRN, MP, CENX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LXFR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.3%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MTRN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KALU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CENX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LXFR and MTRN and MP and KALU and CENX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LXFR: -13.5% · MTRN: 30.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(LXFR: 7.9% · MTRN: 4.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LXFR: 13.5x · MTRN: 53.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.