Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MA vs FIS vs V vs WEX vs FLYW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Financial - Credit Services
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
MA vs FIS vs V vs WEX vs FLYW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Information Technology Services | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $443.44B | $24.47B | $616.45B | $5.00B | $2.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32.79B | $10.89B | $40.00B | $2.70B | $188.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15.57B | $382M | $22.24B | $310M | $12.54B |
| Gross Margin | 83.4% | 38.1% | 80.4% | 57.4% | 0.2% |
| Operating Margin | 59.2% | 17.5% | 60.0% | 24.7% | 5.7% |
| Forward P/E | 25.5x | 7.5x | 24.6x | 7.4x | 49.5x |
| Total Debt | $19.00B | $4.01B | $25.17B | $4.86B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10.57B | $599M | $20.15B | $906M | $330M |
MA vs FIS vs V vs WEX vs FLYW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | 100 | 138.9 | +38.9% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 31.7 | -68.3% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 141.4 | +41.4% |
| WEX Inc. (WEX) | 100 | 73.6 | -26.4% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 51.6 | -48.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MA vs FIS vs V vs WEX vs FLYW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 437.2% 10Y total return vs V's 329.1%
- Beta 0.67 vs FLYW's 1.32
- 29.5% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 56.5% vs 6.0%
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.31 vs V's 1.55
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 49.5x)
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
V is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 66.4%, current ratio 1.08x
- Beta 0.68, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.08x
- 50.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
Among these 5 stocks, WEX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FLYW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.6%, EPS growth 391.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
- 26.6% revenue growth vs WEX's 1.2%
- +62.7% vs FIS's -35.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.6% revenue growth vs WEX's 1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 49.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs FLYW's 1.32 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.5% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 56.5% vs 6.0% |
MA vs FIS vs V vs WEX vs FLYW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MA vs FIS vs V vs WEX vs FLYW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
V leads in 2 of 6 categories
MA leads 1 • FIS leads 0 • WEX leads 0 • FLYW leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 69.9x WEX's $2.7B. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32.8B | $10.9B | $40.0B | $2.7B | $188.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21.6B | $3.8B | $27.6B | $952M | $10.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15.6B | $382M | $22.2B | $310M | $12.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17.7B | $2.8B | $21.2B | $460M | -$15.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.4% | +38.1% | +80.4% | +57.4% | +0.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +59.2% | +17.5% | +60.0% | +24.7% | +5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +3.5% | +50.1% | +11.5% | +6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +51.6% | +26.1% | +53.9% | +17.0% | -8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.2% | — | +5.8% | +1408.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | +92.3% | +35.3% | +22.7% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FIS and WEX each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.0x trailing earnings, WEX trades at a 89% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MA offers better value at 1.44x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $443.4B | $24.5B | $616.4B | $5.0B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $451.9B | $27.9B | $621.5B | $9.0B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.32x | 63.00x | 31.50x | 17.03x | 161.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.55x | 7.54x | 24.59x | 7.43x | 49.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.44x | 2.58x | 1.99x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.00x | 7.66x | 24.65x | 8.89x | 47.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 13.52x | 2.29x | 15.41x | 1.88x | 3.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 58.07x | 1.76x | 16.66x | 4.20x | 2.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.22x | 9.97x | 28.57x | 15.94x | 21.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MA delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WEX's 3.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MA scores 9/9 vs WEX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | +2.7% | +58.9% | +27.0% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +29.5% | +1.1% | +22.7% | +2.1% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +56.5% | +6.0% | +29.2% | +9.6% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +64.4% | +6.6% | +36.2% | +13.4% | +1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.45x | 0.29x | 0.66x | 3.94x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.4B | $3.4B | $5.0B | $4.0B | -$330M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10.6B | $599M | $20.2B | $906M | $330M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.0B | $4.0B | $25.2B | $4.9B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 27.23x | 4.64x | 26.72x | 2.76x | 1.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
V leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in V five years ago would be worth $14,262 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors V at 12.2% vs FLYW's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.7% | -27.3% | -7.1% | -2.8% | +27.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.0% | -35.3% | -7.4% | +19.0% | +62.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.2% | -6.6% | +41.2% | -18.2% | -40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.8% | -63.2% | +42.6% | -26.5% | -49.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +437.2% | -13.2% | +329.1% | +60.9% | -49.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.7% | -2.2% | +12.2% | -6.5% | -15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MA and FLYW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MA is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLYW's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 0.76x | 0.68x | 1.16x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $601.77 | $82.74 | $375.51 | $186.85 | $18.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $480.50 | $43.30 | $293.89 | $120.03 | $9.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.2% | +57.1% | +85.6% | +77.2% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.3 | 43.3 | 53.3 | 38.0 | 83.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 5.5M | 6.9M | 518K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MA as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", V as "Buy", WEX as "Hold", FLYW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs MA's 0.61%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $656.87 | $67.38 | $362.45 | $177.67 | $17.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 64 | 37 | 61 | 32 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +3.5% | +0.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 1 | 15 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.07 | $1.63 | $2.36 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | 0.0% | +2.2% | +16.0% | +3.7% |
V leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
MA vs FIS vs V vs WEX vs FLYW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MA or FIS or V or WEX or FLYW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the stronger pick with 26.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 2% for WEX Inc. (WEX). WEX Inc. (WEX) offers the better valuation at 17. 0x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mastercard Incorporated (MA) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MA or FIS or V or WEX or FLYW?
On trailing P/E, WEX Inc.
(WEX) is the cheapest at 17. 0x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, WEX Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MA or FIS or V or WEX or FLYW?
Over the past 5 years, Visa Inc.
(V) delivered a total return of +42. 6%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MA returned +437. 2% versus FLYW's -49. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MA or FIS or V or WEX or FLYW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Flywire Corporation's 1. 32β — meaning FLYW is approximately 97% more volatile than MA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 4% for WEX Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MA or FIS or V or WEX or FLYW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is pulling ahead at 26.
6% versus 1. 2% for WEX Inc. (WEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLYW leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MA or FIS or V or WEX or FLYW?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 2. 2% for Flywire Corporation — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 1. 8% for FLYW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MA leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MA or FIS or V or WEX or FLYW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, WEX Inc. (WEX) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 42. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — MA or FIS or V or WEX or FLYW?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
5% yield), V (0. 7% yield), MA (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. WEX, FLYW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MA or FIS or V or WEX or FLYW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 0. 6% yield, +437. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MA: +437. 2%, FLYW: -49. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MA and FIS and V and WEX and FLYW?
These companies operate in different sectors (MA (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and V (Financial Services) and WEX (Technology) and FLYW (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MA is a large-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock; WEX is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock. MA, FIS, V pay a dividend while WEX, FLYW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.