Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MAIA vs CYCN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
MAIA vs CYCN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $55M | $13M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -337.4% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8.66B | $3M |
MAIA vs CYCN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAIA Biotechnology,… (MAIA) | 100 | 24.7 | -75.3% |
| Cyclerion Therapeut… (CYCN) | 100 | 16.4 | -83.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAIA vs CYCN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAIA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 33.3%
- -67.9% 10Y total return vs CYCN's -98.8%
- 3.2% margin vs CYCN's -264.7%
CYCN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.21
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, current ratio 5.15x
- Beta 1.21, current ratio 5.15x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.7% revenue growth vs MAIA's -3.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs CYCN's -264.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs MAIA's 1.71 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -6.5% vs MAIA's -18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.0% ROA vs CYCN's -55.1% |
MAIA vs CYCN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MAIA vs CYCN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAIA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CYCN and MAIA operate at a comparable scale, with $2M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | -$7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | -$4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +100.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -180.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | -35.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CYCN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $55M | $13M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$8.6B | $10M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.04x | -2.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.33x | 1.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAIA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAIA delivers a -4.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-62 for CYCN. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAIA scores 2/9 vs CYCN's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.0% | -62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.0% | -55.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -65.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.8% | -55.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8.7B | -$3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8.7B | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CYCN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAIA five years ago would be worth $3,206 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $464 for CYCN. Over the past 12 months, CYCN leads with a -6.5% total return vs MAIA's -18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CYCN at -11.5% vs MAIA's -15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.6% | +123.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.3% | -6.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | -30.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.9% | -95.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.9% | -98.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.3% | -11.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MAIA and CYCN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CYCN is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAIA's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAIA currently trades 44.8% from its 52-week high vs CYCN's 35.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.71x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.19 | $8.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.87 | $1.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.8% | +35.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 49.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 737K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% |
MAIA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CYCN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MAIA vs CYCN: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — MAIA or CYCN?
Over the past 5 years, MAIA Biotechnology, Inc.
(MAIA) delivered a total return of -67. 9%, compared to -95. 4% for Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc. (CYCN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAIA returned -67. 9% versus CYCN's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — MAIA or CYCN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc.
(CYCN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus MAIA Biotechnology, Inc. 's 1. 71β — meaning MAIA is approximately 41% more volatile than CYCN relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — MAIA or CYCN?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MAIA Biotechnology, Inc.
grew EPS 33. 3% year-over-year, compared to 9. 9% for Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — MAIA or CYCN?
MAIA Biotechnology, Inc.
(MAIA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -170. 1% for Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAIA leads at 0. 0% versus -239. 8% for CYCN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CYCN leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — MAIA or CYCN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is MAIA or CYCN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc.
(CYCN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21)). MAIA Biotechnology, Inc. (MAIA) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CYCN: -98. 8%, MAIA: -67. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between MAIA and CYCN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.