Packaged Foods
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MAMA vs BRBS vs NBTB vs HNST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Specialty Retail
MAMA vs BRBS vs NBTB vs HNST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $607M | $302M | $2.52B | $398M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $189M | $151M | $902M | $352M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $11M | $169M | $-19M |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 63.5% | 73.6% | 33.9% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 9.1% | 24.3% | -5.0% |
| Forward P/E | 139.7x | 30.0x | 11.5x | 51.7x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $179M | $327M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $116M | $185M | $90M |
MAMA vs BRBS vs NBTB vs HNST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mama's Creations, I… (MAMA) | 100 | 536.3 | +436.3% |
| Blue Ridge Bankshar… (BRBS) | 100 | 19.3 | -80.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 138.2 | +38.2% |
| The Honest Company,… (HNST) | 100 | 25.2 | -74.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAMA vs BRBS vs NBTB vs HNST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAMA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 39.2%, EPS growth 38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 108.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 27.5%, current ratio 2.17x
- 39.2% revenue growth vs BRBS's -13.4%
BRBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 6.5%
- Beta 0.48, yield 6.5%
- NIM 3.2% vs NBTB's 3.1%
- Beta 0.48 vs HNST's 1.45
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 51.7x)
- 18.8% margin vs HNST's -5.4%
HNST lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.2% revenue growth vs BRBS's -13.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 51.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.8% margin vs HNST's -5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs HNST's 1.45 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, vs NBTB's 3.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.3% vs HNST's -23.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs HNST's -8.2%, ROIC 16.8% vs -13.5% |
MAMA vs BRBS vs NBTB vs HNST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MAMA vs BRBS vs NBTB vs HNST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
MAMA leads 2 • BRBS leads 0 • HNST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $902M annually — 6.0x BRBS's $151M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HNST's -5.4%. On growth, MAMA holds the edge at +49.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $189M | $151M | $902M | $352M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | $15M | $241M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $11M | $169M | -$19M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $9M | $225M | $20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +63.5% | +73.6% | +33.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +9.1% | +24.3% | -5.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +7.1% | +18.8% | -5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +6.1% | +24.9% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.7% | — | — | -19.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +51.3% | +2.6% | +39.5% | -101.3% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 87% valuation discount to MAMA's 114.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 2.06x vs MAMA's 71.07x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $607M | $302M | $2.5B | $398M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $601M | $365M | $2.7B | $314M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 114.69x | 30.00x | 14.47x | -25.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 139.74x | — | 11.54x | 51.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 71.07x | — | 2.06x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 40.90x | 24.32x | 11.03x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.53x | 2.00x | 2.90x | 1.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.73x | 1.08x | 1.29x | 2.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 62.14x | 80.64x | 11.49x | 29.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAMA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAMA delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-11 for HNST. HNST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRBS's 0.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs HNST's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +3.1% | +9.5% | -10.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.9% | +0.4% | +1.1% | -8.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.8% | +2.0% | +7.9% | -13.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.7% | +0.5% | +2.4% | -10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 0.55x | 0.17x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $63M | $142M | -$85M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $116M | $185M | $90M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $179M | $327M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.57x | 0.23x | 1.05x | -26.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAMA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAMA five years ago would be worth $61,867 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,968 for HNST. Over the past 12 months, MAMA leads with a +87.3% total return vs HNST's -23.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAMA at 76.8% vs BRBS's -23.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.3% | -9.1% | +17.6% | +38.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +87.3% | +21.0% | +18.3% | -23.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +452.2% | -54.7% | +48.5% | +119.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +518.7% | -70.4% | +44.4% | -80.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +518.7% | -15.5% | +108.5% | -77.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +76.8% | -23.2% | +14.1% | +29.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRBS and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRBS is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HNST's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs HNST's 68.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.48x | 0.76x | 1.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.85 | $4.79 | $48.27 | $5.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.75 | $3.23 | $39.20 | $2.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +68.9% | +99.8% | +68.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 45.7 | 63.1 | 57.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 427K | 335K | 266K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BRBS and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MAMA as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", HNST as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 54.3% upside for MAMA (target: $23) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, BRBS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.45% vs NBTB's 2.96%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | — | $46.00 | $3.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | — | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.5% | +3.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 13 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.21 | $1.43 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MAMA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
MAMA vs BRBS vs NBTB vs HNST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAMA or BRBS or NBTB or HNST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) is the stronger pick with 39. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 4% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAMA or BRBS or NBTB or HNST?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. at 114. 7x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 64x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAMA or BRBS or NBTB or HNST?
Over the past 5 years, Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) delivered a total return of +518. 7%, compared to -80. 3% for The Honest Company, Inc. (HNST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAMA returned +518. 7% versus HNST's -77. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAMA or BRBS or NBTB or HNST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
(BRBS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus The Honest Company, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning HNST is approximately 204% more volatile than BRBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Honest Company, Inc. (HNST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 55% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAMA or BRBS or NBTB or HNST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) is pulling ahead at 39. 2% versus -13. 4% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 135. 5% year-over-year, compared to -129. 1% for The Honest Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAMA leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAMA or BRBS or NBTB or HNST?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus -4. 2% for The Honest Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus -5. 0% for HNST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAMA or BRBS or NBTB or HNST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 64x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 139. 7x for Mama's Creations, Inc. — 128. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAMA: 54. 3% to $23. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAMA or BRBS or NBTB or HNST?
In this comparison, BRBS (6.
5% yield), NBTB (3. 0% yield) pay a dividend. MAMA, HNST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MAMA or BRBS or NBTB or HNST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
(BRBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), 6. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRBS: -15. 5%, HNST: -77. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAMA and BRBS and NBTB and HNST?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAMA (Consumer Defensive) and BRBS (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and HNST (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MAMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; BRBS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; HNST is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BRBS, NBTB pay a dividend while MAMA, HNST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.