Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MANU vs EA vs DIS vs NFLX vs TTWO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MANU
Manchester United plc

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • GB
Market Cap$3.30B
5Y Perf.+15.0%
EA
Electronic Arts Inc.

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$50.26B
5Y Perf.+63.5%
DIS
The Walt Disney Company

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$192.60B
5Y Perf.-7.3%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$374.00B
5Y Perf.+110.3%
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$46.67B
5Y Perf.+64.1%

MANU vs EA vs DIS vs NFLX vs TTWO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MANU logoMANU
EA logoEA
DIS logoDIS
NFLX logoNFLX
TTWO logoTTWO
IndustryEntertainmentElectronic Gaming & MultimediaEntertainmentEntertainmentElectronic Gaming & Multimedia
Market Cap$3.30B$50.26B$192.60B$374.00B$46.67B
Revenue (TTM)$655M$7.53B$97.26B$45.18B$6.56B
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$887M$11.22B$10.98B$-3.96B
Gross Margin64.8%79.0%37.2%48.5%55.3%
Operating Margin2.8%15.4%15.5%29.5%-59.3%
Forward P/E23.4x16.5x24.8x57.3x
Total Debt$645M$1.49B$44.88B$14.46B$4.11B
Cash & Equiv.$86M$2.86B$5.70B$9.03B$1.46B

MANU vs EA vs DIS vs NFLX vs TTWOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MANU
EA
DIS
NFLX
TTWO
StockMay 20May 26Return
Manchester United p… (MANU)100115.0+15.0%
Electronic Arts Inc. (EA)100163.5+63.5%
The Walt Disney Com… (DIS)10092.7-7.3%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100210.3+110.3%
Take-Two Interactiv… (TTWO)100164.1+64.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MANU vs EA vs DIS vs NFLX vs TTWO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NFLX leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Electronic Arts Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. MANU and DIS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MANU
Manchester United plc
The Momentum Pick

MANU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +32.7% vs NFLX's -23.6%
Best for: momentum
EA
Electronic Arts Inc.
The Income Pick

EA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.18, yield 0.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 22.0%, current ratio 1.05x
  • Beta 0.18, yield 0.4%, current ratio 1.05x
  • Beta 0.18 vs MANU's 0.92, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
DIS
The Walt Disney Company
The Value Play

DIS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (16.5x vs 57.3x)
Best for: value
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Growth Play

NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
  • 8.8% 10Y total return vs TTWO's 5.4%
  • PEG 0.75 vs EA's 5.69
  • 15.9% revenue growth vs MANU's 0.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, TTWO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNFLX logoNFLX15.9% revenue growth vs MANU's 0.7%
ValueDIS logoDISLower P/E (16.5x vs 57.3x)
Quality / MarginsNFLX logoNFLX24.3% margin vs TTWO's -60.4%
Stability / SafetyEA logoEABeta 0.18 vs MANU's 0.92, lower leverage
DividendsEA logoEA0.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MANU logoMANU+32.7% vs NFLX's -23.6%
Efficiency (ROA)NFLX logoNFLX19.8% ROA vs TTWO's -39.6%, ROIC 29.8% vs -49.8%

MANU vs EA vs DIS vs NFLX vs TTWO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MANUManchester United plc
FY 2025
Commercial
38.7%$333M
Sponsorship
21.9%$188M
Broadcasting
20.1%$173M
Matchday
18.6%$160M
Broadcasting Other
0.7%$6M
EAElectronic Arts Inc.
FY 2025
Live services and other, net revenue
73.2%$5.5B
Full game downloads, net revenue
19.8%$1.5B
Packaged goods, net revenue
7.0%$524M
DISThe Walt Disney Company
FY 2025
Admission
20.7%$11.7B
Advertising
19.6%$11.1B
Retail and wholesale sales of merchandise, food and beverage
17.0%$9.6B
Resort and vacations
16.3%$9.2B
Other Revenue
8.3%$4.7B
License
6.8%$3.9B
TV/SVOD distribution licensing
6.7%$3.8B
Other (1)
4.6%$2.6B
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B
TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
FY 2025
Mobile
52.2%$2.9B
Console
37.3%$2.1B
P C And Other Products
10.5%$593M

MANU vs EA vs DIS vs NFLX vs TTWO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNFLXLAGGINGTTWO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — EA and NFLX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 148.4x MANU's $655M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTWO's -60.4%. On growth, TTWO holds the edge at +24.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMANU logoMANUManchester United…EA logoEAElectronic Arts I…DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.TTWO logoTTWOTake-Two Interact…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$655M$7.5B$97.3B$45.2B$6.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$238M$1.2B$20.5B$30.1B-$2.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M$887M$11.2B$11.0B-$4.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$135M$2.3B$7.1B$9.5B$488M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+64.8%+79.0%+37.2%+48.5%+55.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.8%+15.4%+15.5%+29.5%-59.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-1.4%+11.8%+11.5%+24.3%-60.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-20.6%+30.8%+7.3%+20.9%+7.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.2%+11.1%+6.5%+17.6%+24.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+115.1%+90.6%-29.8%+31.1%+29.6%
Evenly matched — EA and NFLX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

DIS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.9x trailing earnings, DIS trades at a 72% valuation discount to EA's 57.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs EA's 13.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMANU logoMANUManchester United…EA logoEAElectronic Arts I…DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.TTWO logoTTWOTake-Two Interact…
Market CapShares × price$3.3B$50.3B$192.6B$374.0B$46.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.1B$48.9B$231.8B$379.4B$49.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-74.04x57.22x15.87x34.89x-8.74x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.38x16.53x24.80x57.26x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate13.93x1.06x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.41x39.81x12.10x12.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.64x6.67x2.04x8.28x8.28x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share12.53x7.51x1.72x14.32x18.31x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF86.79x21.64x19.11x39.53x
DIS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-113 for TTWO. EA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MANU's 3.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs TTWO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMANU logoMANUManchester United…EA logoEAElectronic Arts I…DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.TTWO logoTTWOTake-Two Interact…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.8%+14.2%+9.8%+41.3%-113.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.5%+7.1%+5.6%+19.8%-39.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.0%+14.7%+6.9%+29.8%-49.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.1%+12.7%+8.5%+30.5%-57.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956873
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.33x0.22x0.39x0.54x1.92x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$559M-$1.4B$39.2B$5.4B$2.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$86M$2.9B$5.7B$9.0B$1.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$645M$1.5B$44.9B$14.5B$4.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.62x9.95x17.33x-69.94x
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,017 for DIS. Over the past 12 months, MANU leads with a +32.7% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs MANU's 0.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMANU logoMANUManchester United…EA logoEAElectronic Arts I…DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.TTWO logoTTWOTake-Two Interact…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+21.2%-1.6%-2.8%-3.0%-11.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+32.7%+29.7%+7.7%-23.6%-1.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+2.2%+61.5%+8.0%+166.5%+77.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+16.6%+43.6%-39.8%+75.2%+31.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+19.9%+217.6%+11.8%+875.3%+544.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.7%+17.3%+2.6%+38.6%+21.2%
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

EA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

EA is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MANU's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EA currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMANU logoMANUManchester United…EA logoEAElectronic Arts I…DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.TTWO logoTTWOTake-Two Interact…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.92x0.18x0.90x0.39x0.63x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.65$204.89$124.69$134.12$264.79
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.22$141.19$92.19$75.01$187.63
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.4%+98.0%+87.2%+65.8%+84.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.235.164.435.362.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded307K1.8M9.1M44.0M1.6M
EA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — EA and DIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MANU as "Hold", EA as "Hold", DIS as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", TTWO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs -14.0% for EA (target: $173). For income investors, DIS offers the higher dividend yield at 0.92% vs EA's 0.38%.

MetricMANU logoMANUManchester United…EA logoEAElectronic Arts I…DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.TTWO logoTTWOTake-Two Interact…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.95$172.65$139.50$116.29$291.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts1066639956
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1211
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.75$1.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.1%+1.8%+2.4%0.0%
Evenly matched — EA and DIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). DIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallNetflix, Inc. (NFLX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MANU vs EA vs DIS vs NFLX vs TTWO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX or TTWO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 7% for Manchester United plc (MANU). The Walt Disney Company (DIS) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Walt Disney Company (DIS) a "Buy" — based on 63 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX or TTWO?

On trailing P/E, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the cheapest at 15.

9x versus Electronic Arts Inc. at 57. 2x. On forward P/E, The Walt Disney Company is actually cheaper at 16. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Electronic Arts Inc. 's 5. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX or TTWO?

Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -39. 8% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus DIS's +11. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX or TTWO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Electronic Arts Inc.

(EA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus Manchester United plc's 0. 92β — meaning MANU is approximately 400% more volatile than EA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for Manchester United plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX or TTWO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 0. 7% for Manchester United plc (MANU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to -17. 0% for Electronic Arts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTWO leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX or TTWO?

Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -79. 5% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -77. 9% for TTWO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MANU leads at 82. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX or TTWO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Electronic Arts Inc. 's 5. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 57. 3x for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. — 40. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX or TTWO?

In this comparison, DIS (0.

9% yield), EA (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. MANU, NFLX, TTWO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX or TTWO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, MANU: +19. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MANU and EA and DIS and NFLX and TTWO?

These companies operate in different sectors (MANU (Communication Services) and EA (Communication Services) and DIS (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and TTWO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MANU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; TTWO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. DIS pays a dividend while MANU, EA, NFLX, TTWO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MANU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DIS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TTWO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MANU and EA and DIS and NFLX and TTWO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MANU: -4.2% · EA: 11.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.