Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MANU vs MSGE vs TKO vs DIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
MANU vs MSGE vs TKO vs DIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $3.25B | $2.71B | $37.07B | $191.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $655M | $1.01B | $5.06B | $97.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $52M | $385M | $11.22B |
| Gross Margin | 64.8% | 46.1% | 34.5% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 13.5% | 20.0% | 15.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 57.0x | 38.7x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $645M | $1.20B | $4.06B | $44.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $86M | $43M | $831M | $5.70B |
MANU vs MSGE vs TKO vs DIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manchester United p… (MANU) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 84.5 | -15.5% |
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 100 | 411.6 | +311.6% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.1 | -7.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MANU vs MSGE vs TKO vs DIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MANU lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MSGE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +88.1% vs TKO's +15.0%
TKO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 1.7%
- Rev growth 68.9%, EPS growth 40.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 60.7%
- 10.7% 10Y total return vs MANU's 17.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 43.9%, current ratio 1.26x
DIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (16.4x vs 38.7x)
- 11.5% margin vs MANU's -1.4%
- 5.6% ROA vs MANU's -0.5%, ROIC 6.9% vs -2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 68.9% revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 38.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.5% margin vs MANU's -1.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs MSGE's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.1% vs TKO's +15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs MANU's -0.5%, ROIC 6.9% vs -2.0% |
MANU vs MSGE vs TKO vs DIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MANU vs MSGE vs TKO vs DIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TKO leads in 2 of 6 categories
DIS leads 2 • MSGE leads 1 • MANU leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TKO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 148.4x MANU's $655M. DIS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MANU's -1.4%. On growth, TKO holds the edge at +25.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $655M | $1.0B | $5.1B | $97.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $238M | $195M | $1.5B | $20.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $52M | $385M | $11.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$135M | $207M | $1.8B | $7.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.8% | +46.1% | +34.5% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +13.5% | +20.0% | +15.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | +5.1% | +7.6% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.6% | +20.4% | +35.0% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +12.9% | +25.9% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.1% | +24.4% | +62.3% | -29.8% |
Valuation Metrics
DIS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, DIS trades at a 82% valuation discount to MSGE's 86.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIS's 12.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TKO's 27.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $2.7B | $37.1B | $191.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $3.9B | $40.3B | $230.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -72.96x | 86.95x | 84.28x | 15.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 57.04x | 38.72x | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 70.71x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.23x | 21.48x | 27.87x | 12.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.59x | 2.87x | 7.83x | 2.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.35x | — | 3.99x | 1.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 85.52x | 29.06x | 31.99x | 18.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DIS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSGE delivers a 144.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $144 in annual profit, vs $-5 for MANU. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MANU's 3.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs TKO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.8% | +144.2% | +4.7% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.5% | +2.8% | +2.5% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | +8.5% | +6.1% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | +11.0% | +7.5% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.33x | — | 0.44x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $559M | $1.2B | $3.2B | $39.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86M | $43M | $831M | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $645M | $1.2B | $4.1B | $44.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.62x | 3.08x | 6.00x | 9.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSGE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TKO five years ago would be worth $36,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,078 for DIS. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +88.1% total return vs TKO's +15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSGE at 25.0% vs MANU's 0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.4% | +23.2% | -7.6% | -3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.4% | +88.1% | +15.0% | +18.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.6% | +95.5% | +85.8% | +7.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.9% | -22.8% | +261.2% | -39.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.6% | -24.4% | +1072.7% | +10.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.2% | +25.0% | +22.9% | +2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSGE and TKO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TKO is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSGE's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSGE currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs TKO's 83.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.94x | 0.64x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.65 | $68.51 | $226.94 | $124.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.22 | $33.38 | $152.29 | $91.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.9% | +97.7% | +83.9% | +86.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 64.8 | 43.5 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 320K | 304K | 1.3M | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
TKO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MANU as "Hold", MSGE as "Buy", TKO as "Buy", DIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.2% upside for DIS (target: $140) vs -4.7% for MANU (target: $18). For income investors, TKO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.73% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.95 | $66.29 | $236.67 | $139.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 12 | 19 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.7% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.30 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | +2.3% | +1.8% |
TKO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). DIS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
MANU vs MSGE vs TKO vs DIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MANU or MSGE or TKO or DIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is the stronger pick with 68. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). The Walt Disney Company (DIS) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MANU or MSGE or TKO or DIS?
On trailing P/E, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the cheapest at 15.
8x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 86. 9x. On forward P/E, The Walt Disney Company is actually cheaper at 16. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MANU or MSGE or TKO or DIS?
Over the past 5 years, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) delivered a total return of +261. 2%, compared to -39. 2% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TKO returned +1073% versus MSGE's -24. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MANU or MSGE or TKO or DIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. 's 0. 94β — meaning MSGE is approximately 47% more volatile than TKO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 3% for Manchester United plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MANU or MSGE or TKO or DIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is pulling ahead at 68. 9% versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TKO Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 40. 3% year-over-year, compared to -74. 1% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TKO leads at 60. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MANU or MSGE or TKO or DIS?
The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
1% net margin versus -5. 0% for Manchester United plc — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TKO leads at 20. 3% versus -2. 8% for MANU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MANU leads at 82. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MANU or MSGE or TKO or DIS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) trades at 16.
4x forward P/E versus 57. 0x for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. — 40. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIS: 29. 2% to $139. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MANU or MSGE or TKO or DIS?
In this comparison, TKO (1.
7% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. MANU, MSGE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MANU or MSGE or TKO or DIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 1. 7% yield, +1073% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKO: +1073%, MSGE: -24. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MANU and MSGE and TKO and DIS?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MANU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TKO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. TKO, DIS pay a dividend while MANU, MSGE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.