MAPS vs TRMK

For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 3% for WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.

1x versus WM Technology, Inc. at 18. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) delivered a total return of +47.

4%, compared to -97. 7% for WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMK returned +127. 3% versus MAPS's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WM Technology, Inc.

(MAPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Trustmark Corporation's 0. 94β — meaning TRMK is approximately 66% more volatile than MAPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 53% for Trustmark Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.

8% versus -5. 3% for WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trustmark Corporation grew EPS 1. 9% year-over-year, compared to -74. 6% for WM Technology, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

0% net margin versus 1. 1% for WM Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMK leads at 25. 5% versus 0. 4% for MAPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAPS leads at 94. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, TRMK (2.

1% yield) pays a dividend. MAPS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

94), 2. 1% yield, +127. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRMK: +127. 3%, MAPS: -96. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (MAPS (Technology) and TRMK (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MAPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock. TRMK pays a dividend while MAPS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.