Construction
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MAS vs ALLE vs TREX vs NVR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Construction
Residential Construction
MAS vs ALLE vs TREX vs NVR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Security & Protection Services | Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $14.51B | $11.76B | $4.12B | $16.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.68B | $4.16B | $1.18B | $10.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $837M | $634M | $191M | $1.34B |
| Gross Margin | 35.4% | 45.0% | 39.2% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.8% | 20.6% | 22.1% | 16.5% |
| Forward P/E | 16.9x | 15.6x | 24.0x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $3.44B | $2.28B | $229M | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $647M | $356M | $4M | $1.96B |
MAS vs ALLE vs TREX vs NVR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Masco Corporation (MAS) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
| Allegion plc (ALLE) | 100 | 137.2 | +37.2% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
| NVR, Inc. (NVR) | 100 | 186.5 | +86.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAS vs ALLE vs TREX vs NVR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 1.7%
- 1.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ALLE's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +21.1% vs TREX's -30.8%
ALLE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.8%, EPS growth 9.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, current ratio 1.84x
- PEG 0.92 vs TREX's 7.16
- Beta 0.67, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.84x
TREX is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 16.3% margin vs MAS's 10.9%
NVR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 264.9% 10Y total return vs MAS's 152.1%
- 22.3% ROA vs ALLE's 12.3%, ROIC 43.8% vs 18.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.8% revenue growth vs MAS's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 24.0x), PEG 0.92 vs 7.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.3% margin vs MAS's 10.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs TREX's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ALLE's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.1% vs TREX's -30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.3% ROA vs ALLE's 12.3%, ROIC 43.8% vs 18.1% |
MAS vs ALLE vs TREX vs NVR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MAS vs ALLE vs TREX vs NVR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVR leads in 2 of 6 categories
MAS leads 2 • TREX leads 1 • ALLE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TREX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVR is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.2B annually — 8.6x TREX's $1.2B. TREX is the more profitable business, keeping 16.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAS's 10.9%. On growth, ALLE holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.7B | $4.2B | $1.2B | $10.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $959M | $309M | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $837M | $634M | $191M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $943M | $704M | $263M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.4% | +45.0% | +39.2% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +20.6% | +22.1% | +16.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +15.2% | +16.3% | +13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +16.9% | +22.3% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +9.7% | +1.0% | -4.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.7% | -7.0% | +3.6% | -13.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NVR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.8x trailing earnings, NVR trades at a 37% valuation discount to TREX's 22.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVR offers better value at 1.01x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.5B | $11.8B | $4.1B | $16.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17.3B | $13.7B | $4.3B | $15.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.63x | 18.39x | 22.00x | 13.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.85x | 15.60x | 23.95x | 16.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.76x | 1.08x | 6.58x | 1.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.18x | 13.83x | 13.53x | 8.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.92x | 2.89x | 3.51x | 1.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 201.40x | 5.72x | 4.05x | 4.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.76x | 17.14x | 30.60x | 15.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $19 for TREX. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAS scores 6/9 vs NVR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.0% | +32.1% | +18.8% | +34.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.9% | +12.3% | +12.3% | +22.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +35.4% | +18.1% | +16.4% | +43.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.9% | +20.8% | +23.2% | +32.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 45.81x | 1.10x | 0.22x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.8B | $1.9B | $225M | -$760M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $647M | $356M | $4M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.4B | $2.3B | $229M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.60x | 8.61x | — | 63.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAS five years ago would be worth $11,609 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,599 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, MAS leads with a +21.1% total return vs TREX's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAS at 11.9% vs TREX's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.1% | -14.6% | +9.3% | -17.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.1% | -1.0% | -30.8% | -15.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.1% | +32.6% | -30.4% | +2.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.1% | +3.2% | -64.0% | +15.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +152.1% | +127.3% | +239.9% | +264.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.9% | +9.9% | -11.4% | +0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MAS and ALLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TREX's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAS currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs TREX's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 0.67x | 1.47x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $79.19 | $183.11 | $68.78 | $8618.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.16 | $131.25 | $29.77 | $5930.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.8% | +74.7% | +56.9% | +69.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.6 | 38.5 | 51.3 | 36.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 887K | 1.7M | 19K |
Analyst Outlook
MAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MAS as "Buy", ALLE as "Hold", TREX as "Hold", NVR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.1% upside for ALLE (target: $173) vs 13.6% for TREX (target: $45). For income investors, MAS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.73% vs ALLE's 1.48%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $82.36 | $172.50 | $44.50 | $7465.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 38 | 23 | 31 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +1.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 12 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.24 | $2.03 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +0.7% | +1.3% | +11.0% |
NVR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MAS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
MAS vs ALLE vs TREX vs NVR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAS or ALLE or TREX or NVR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger pick with 7.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). NVR, Inc. (NVR) offers the better valuation at 13. 8x trailing P/E (16. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Masco Corporation (MAS) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAS or ALLE or TREX or NVR?
On trailing P/E, NVR, Inc.
(NVR) is the cheapest at 13. 8x versus Trex Company, Inc. at 22. 0x. On forward P/E, Allegion plc is actually cheaper at 15. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allegion plc wins at 0. 92x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAS or ALLE or TREX or NVR?
Over the past 5 years, Masco Corporation (MAS) delivered a total return of +16.
1%, compared to -64. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVR returned +264. 9% versus ALLE's +127. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAS or ALLE or TREX or NVR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allegion plc (ALLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning TREX is approximately 121% more volatile than ALLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAS or ALLE or TREX or NVR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Allegion plc (ALLE) is pulling ahead at 7.
8% versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Allegion plc grew EPS 9. 1% year-over-year, compared to -14. 8% for Trex Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALLE leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAS or ALLE or TREX or NVR?
Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus 10. 7% for Masco Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TREX leads at 22. 0% versus 16. 2% for NVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALLE leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAS or ALLE or TREX or NVR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Allegion plc (ALLE) trades at 15. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 0x for Trex Company, Inc. — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALLE: 26. 1% to $172. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAS or ALLE or TREX or NVR?
In this comparison, MAS (1.
7% yield), ALLE (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. TREX, NVR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MAS or ALLE or TREX or NVR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 1. 5% yield, +127. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALLE: +127. 3%, TREX: +239. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAS and ALLE and TREX and NVR?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAS (Industrials) and ALLE (Industrials) and TREX (Industrials) and NVR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ALLE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVR is a mid-cap deep-value stock. MAS, ALLE pay a dividend while TREX, NVR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.