MATX vs INSW vs ZIM vs SBLK

For growth investors, Matson, Inc.

(MATX) is the stronger pick with -2. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 1% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) offers the better valuation at 6. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Matson, Inc. (MATX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.

(ZIM) is the cheapest at 6. 6x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Star Bulk Carriers Corp. wins at 0. 16x versus Matson, Inc. 's 0. 52x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) delivered a total return of +438. 1%, compared to +79. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus MATX's +476. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 43β versus Matson, Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning MATX is approximately 309% more volatile than INSW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Matson, Inc. (MATX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 143% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Matson, Inc.

(MATX) is pulling ahead at -2. 3% versus -18. 1% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Matson, Inc. grew EPS -0. 4% year-over-year, compared to -77. 7% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INSW leads at -0. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 6. 9% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 12. 2% for ZIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSW leads at 42. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 16x versus Matson, Inc. 's 0. 52x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 13. 4x for Matson, Inc. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 8. 2% to $29. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) offers the highest yield at 16. 4%, versus 0. 8% for Matson, Inc. (MATX).

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Matson, Inc. (MATX) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, MATX: +476. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (MATX (Industrials) and INSW (Energy) and ZIM (Industrials) and SBLK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MATX is a small-cap deep-value stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; ZIM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.