Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MAZE vs BEAM vs KO vs RARE vs EDIT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
MAZE vs BEAM vs KO vs RARE vs EDIT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.33B | $2.98B | $355.61B | $2.39B | $245M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $132M | $49.28B | $669M | $39M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-123M | $-65M | $13.70B | $-609M | $-109M |
| Gross Margin | 92.0% | -64.2% | 61.7% | 83.6% | 98.8% |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | -281.0% | 29.3% | -83.9% | -297.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 25.3x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $23M | $294M | $45.49B | $1.28B | $77M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $189M | $295M | $10.27B | $434M | $147M |
MAZE vs BEAM vs KO vs RARE vs EDIT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maze Therapeutics, … (MAZE) | 100 | 150.8 | +50.8% |
| Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM) | 100 | 112.0 | +12.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 130.2 | +30.2% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 56.6 | -43.4% |
| Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT) | 100 | 190.8 | +90.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAZE vs BEAM vs KO vs RARE vs EDIT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAZE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.13, Low D/E 6.6%, current ratio 15.50x
- Beta 1.13, current ratio 15.50x
- Beta 1.13 vs EDIT's 2.52, lower leverage
- +77.5% vs RARE's -38.0%
BEAM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 120.0%, EPS growth 82.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.9%
- 120.0% revenue growth vs MAZE's -100.0%
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs BEAM's 54.8%
- 27.8% margin vs MAZE's -6.1%
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 13.1% ROA vs EDIT's -58.2%
RARE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.43
Among these 5 stocks, EDIT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 120.0% revenue growth vs MAZE's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs MAZE's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.13 vs EDIT's 2.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.5% vs RARE's -38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs EDIT's -58.2% |
MAZE vs BEAM vs KO vs RARE vs EDIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MAZE vs BEAM vs KO vs RARE vs EDIT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories
BEAM leads 1 • MAZE leads 1 • RARE leads 0 • EDIT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 2464.2x MAZE's $20M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAZE's -6.1%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $132M | $49.3B | $669M | $39M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$132M | -$355M | $15.5B | -$536M | -$111M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$123M | -$65M | $13.7B | -$609M | -$109M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$122M | -$384M | $12.6B | -$487M | -$141M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.0% | -64.2% | +61.7% | +83.6% | +98.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | -2.8% | +29.3% | -83.9% | -3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | -49.2% | +27.8% | -91.0% | -2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | -2.9% | +25.5% | -72.8% | -3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% | +12.1% | -2.4% | -39.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.9% | +26.6% | +18.2% | -17.2% | +71.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BEAM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $3.0B | $355.6B | $2.4B | $245M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $3.0B | $390.8B | $3.2B | $175M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.89x | -35.84x | 27.18x | -4.18x | -1.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 25.27x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 26.39x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 21.34x | 7.42x | 3.56x | 6.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.91x | 2.32x | 10.40x | — | 8.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 67.15x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-7 for EDIT. MAZE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EDIT's 2.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs EDIT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.6% | -5.9% | +41.1% | -6.1% | -6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.8% | -4.6% | +13.1% | -45.8% | -58.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -99.4% | -31.1% | +15.8% | -89.4% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -48.1% | -33.3% | +17.3% | -46.4% | -49.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.24x | 1.33x | — | 2.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$166M | -$1M | $35.2B | $842M | -$70M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $189M | $295M | $10.3B | $434M | $147M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $294M | $45.5B | $1.3B | $77M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.24x | 1.08x | 10.70x | -14.49x | -91.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAZE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $649 for EDIT. Over the past 12 months, MAZE leads with a +77.5% total return vs RARE's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAZE at 14.7% vs EDIT's -36.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.5% | +7.0% | +20.3% | +3.2% | +22.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.5% | +66.5% | +17.2% | -38.0% | +14.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | -12.0% | +47.0% | -52.6% | -74.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | -68.4% | +65.6% | -76.3% | -93.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +54.8% | +121.1% | -59.4% | -91.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | -4.2% | +13.7% | -22.0% | -36.9% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDIT's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs MAZE's 44.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 2.18x | -0.20x | 1.43x | 2.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.65 | $36.44 | $84.04 | $42.37 | $4.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.83 | $15.60 | $65.35 | $18.29 | $1.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.8% | +79.7% | +98.3% | +57.5% | +55.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.2 | 48.4 | 60.6 | 53.2 | 39.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 642K | 1.9M | 12.7M | 1.5M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MAZE as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", EDIT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 163.0% upside for MAZE (target: $63) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $63.25 | $48.00 | $86.13 | $48.36 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 27 | 48 | 33 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 56 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BEAM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MAZE vs BEAM vs KO vs RARE vs EDIT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAZE or BEAM or KO or RARE or EDIT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is the stronger pick with 120. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MAZE or BEAM or KO or RARE or EDIT?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -93. 5% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus EDIT's -91. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MAZE or BEAM or KO or RARE or EDIT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Editas Medicine, Inc. 's 2. 52β — meaning EDIT is approximately -1361% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for Editas Medicine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MAZE or BEAM or KO or RARE or EDIT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is pulling ahead at 120. 0% versus -100. 0% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beam Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 82. 3% year-over-year, compared to -40. 2% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEAM leads at 31. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MAZE or BEAM or KO or RARE or EDIT?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -612. 7% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -670. 3% for MAZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EDIT leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MAZE or BEAM or KO or RARE or EDIT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAZE: 163.
0% to $63. 25.
07Which pays a better dividend — MAZE or BEAM or KO or RARE or EDIT?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. MAZE, BEAM, RARE, EDIT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is MAZE or BEAM or KO or RARE or EDIT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, EDIT: -91. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MAZE and BEAM and KO and RARE and EDIT?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAZE (Healthcare) and BEAM (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and RARE (Healthcare) and EDIT (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MAZE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; EDIT is a small-cap high-growth stock. KO pays a dividend while MAZE, BEAM, RARE, EDIT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.