Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MAZE logo
MAZE
RARE logo
RARE
FOLD logo
FOLD
ACMR logo
ACMR
BEAM logo
BEAM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MAZE vs RARE vs FOLD vs ACMR vs BEAM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MAZE
Maze Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.33B
5Y Perf.+51.0%
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.36B
5Y Perf.-44.3%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.+50.9%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.07B
5Y Perf.+346.2%
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.02B
5Y Perf.+13.5%

MAZE vs RARE vs FOLD vs ACMR vs BEAM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MAZE logoMAZE
RARE logoRARE
FOLD logoFOLD
ACMR logoACMR
BEAM logoBEAM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologySemiconductorsBiotechnology
Market Cap$1.33B$2.36B$4.55B$6.07B$3.02B
Revenue (TTM)$20M$669M$634M$960M$132M
Net Income (TTM)$-123M$-609M$-27M$91M$-65M
Gross Margin92.0%83.6%87.9%44.2%-64.2%
Operating Margin-6.7%-83.9%5.2%12.5%-281.0%
Forward P/E40.6x46.0x
Total Debt$23M$1.28B$483M$303M$294M
Cash & Equiv.$189M$434M$214M$766M$295M

MAZE vs RARE vs FOLD vs ACMR vs BEAMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MAZE
RARE
FOLD
ACMR
BEAM
StockJan 25Jun 26Return
Maze Therapeutics, … (MAZE)100151.0+51.0%
Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE)10055.7-44.3%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)100150.9+50.9%
ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)100446.2+346.2%
Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM)100113.5+13.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MAZE vs RARE vs FOLD vs ACMR vs BEAM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACMR leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. BEAM also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇ACMR emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
MAZE
Maze Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

MAZE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.13, Low D/E 6.6%, current ratio 15.50x
  • Beta 1.13, current ratio 15.50x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Income Pick

RARE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.47
Best for: income & stability
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Value Play

FOLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.

  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 0.50 vs ACMR's 3.40
Best for: value and stability
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 48.0% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 147.3%
  • 9.5% margin vs MAZE's -6.1%
  • 0.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • +254.7% vs RARE's -36.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics Inc.
The Growth Play

BEAM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 120.0%, EPS growth 82.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.9%
  • 120.0% revenue growth vs MAZE's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBEAM logoBEAM120.0% revenue growth vs MAZE's -100.0%
ValueFOLD logoFOLDBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsACMR logoACMR9.5% margin vs MAZE's -6.1%
Stability / SafetyFOLD logoFOLDBeta 0.50 vs ACMR's 3.40
DividendsACMR logoACMR0.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ACMR logoACMR+254.7% vs RARE's -36.1%
Efficiency (ROA)ACMR logoACMR3.4% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 7.0% vs -89.4%

MAZE vs RARE vs FOLD vs ACMR vs BEAM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
MAZEMaze Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
54.8%$369M
Royalty
45.2%$304M
FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ACMRACM Research, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Single Wafer and Semi-Critical Cleaning Equipment
69.5%$626M
ECP Front End And Packaging Furnace And Other Technologies
22.1%$200M
Advanced Packaging (exclude ECP), Services & Spares
8.4%$76M
BEAMBeam Therapeutics Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MAZE vs RARE vs FOLD vs ACMR vs BEAM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACMRLAGGINGBEAM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ACMR is the larger business by revenue, generating $960M annually — 48.0x MAZE's $20M. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAZE's -6.1%. On growth, ACMR holds the edge at +34.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMAZE logoMAZEMaze Therapeutics…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$20M$669M$634M$960M$132M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$132M-$536M$40M$139M-$355M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$123M-$609M-$27M$91M-$65M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$122M-$487M$30M-$108M-$384M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+92.0%+83.6%+87.9%+44.2%-64.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-6.7%-83.9%+5.2%+12.5%-2.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-6.1%-91.0%-4.3%+9.5%-49.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-6.1%-72.8%+4.7%-11.3%-2.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.4%+23.7%+34.2%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.9%-17.2%-89.0%-20.0%+26.6%
ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ACMR's 44.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.

MetricMAZE logoMAZEMaze Therapeutics…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$2.4B$4.5B$6.1B$3.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.2B$3.2B$4.8B$5.6B$3.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-7.90x-4.11x-164.85x66.93x-36.31x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.40.62x45.96x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.89x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple114.88x44.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.50x7.17x6.74x21.62x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.92x16.29x3.20x2.35x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF152.43x
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACMR delivers a 5.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. MAZE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAZE scores 4/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricMAZE logoMAZEMaze Therapeutics…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-36.6%-6.1%-12.0%+5.1%-5.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-31.8%-45.8%-3.2%+3.4%-4.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-99.4%-89.4%+5.3%+7.0%-31.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-48.1%-46.4%+5.1%+6.6%-33.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944424
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x1.76x0.16x0.24x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$166M$842M$269M-$463M-$1M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$189M$434M$214M$766M$295M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$23M$1.3B$483M$303M$294M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-148.24x-14.49x1.00x20.41x1.08x
ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $30,990 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,358 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, ACMR leads with a +254.7% total return vs RARE's -36.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 105.7% vs RARE's -22.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMAZE logoMAZEMaze Therapeutics…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-39.4%+1.6%+1.5%+104.3%+8.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+88.5%-36.1%+136.0%+254.7%+64.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+51.0%-53.3%+11.6%+770.8%-10.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+51.0%-76.4%+36.4%+209.9%-66.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+51.0%-60.0%+147.3%+4803.7%+56.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.7%-22.4%+3.7%+105.7%-3.7%
ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs MAZE's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMAZE logoMAZEMaze Therapeutics…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.13x1.47x0.50x3.40x2.27x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$53.65$42.37$14.50$94.21$36.44
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.83$18.29$5.51$23.03$15.60
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+44.9%+56.6%+99.9%+97.3%+80.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.047.572.255.648.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded646K1.5M2.3M1.4M1.9M
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ACMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: MAZE as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 162.6% upside for MAZE (target: $63) vs -4.6% for ACMR (target: $88). ACMR is the only dividend payer here at 0.12% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMAZE logoMAZEMaze Therapeutics…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$63.25$48.36$14.50$87.50$48.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts633241027
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises130
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.11
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.1%0.0%
ACMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ACMR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FOLD leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MAZE vs RARE vs FOLD vs ACMR vs BEAM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MAZE or RARE or FOLD or ACMR or BEAM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Beam Therapeutics Inc.

(BEAM) is the stronger pick with 120. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 66. 9x trailing P/E (46. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MAZE or RARE or FOLD or ACMR or BEAM?

On forward P/E, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 40. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MAZE or RARE or FOLD or ACMR or BEAM?

Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) delivered a total return of +209. 9%, compared to -76. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +48. 0% versus RARE's -60. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MAZE or RARE or FOLD or ACMR or BEAM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 40β — meaning ACMR is approximately 578% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MAZE or RARE or FOLD or ACMR or BEAM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beam Therapeutics Inc.

(BEAM) is pulling ahead at 120. 0% versus -100. 0% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beam Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 82. 3% year-over-year, compared to -40. 2% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MAZE or RARE or FOLD or ACMR or BEAM?

ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -612. 7% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACMR leads at 12. 1% versus -670. 3% for MAZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAZE leads at 92. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MAZE or RARE or FOLD or ACMR or BEAM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) trades at 40. 6x forward P/E versus 46. 0x for ACM Research, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAZE: 162. 6% to $63. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MAZE or RARE or FOLD or ACMR or BEAM?

In this comparison, ACMR (0.

1% yield) pays a dividend. MAZE, RARE, FOLD, BEAM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MAZE or RARE or FOLD or ACMR or BEAM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), +147. 3% 10Y return). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +147. 3%, ACMR: +48. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MAZE and RARE and FOLD and ACMR and BEAM?

These companies operate in different sectors (MAZE (Healthcare) and RARE (Healthcare) and FOLD (Healthcare) and ACMR (Technology) and BEAM (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MAZE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.