Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MBBC vs CHMG vs CZWI vs NBTB vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
MBBC vs CHMG vs CZWI vs NBTB vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $46M | $331M | $203M | $2.35B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $140M | $90M | $867M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $312K | $15M | $14M | $169M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 66.8% | 64.2% | 54.7% | 72.1% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | 14.2% | 7.0% | 25.3% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 1005.8x | 9.6x | 11.8x | 10.8x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $5M | $52M | $327M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $23M | $119M | $185M | $599M |
MBBC vs CHMG vs CZWI vs NBTB vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marathon Bancorp, I… (MBBC) | 100 | 208.2 | +108.2% |
| Chemung Financial C… (CHMG) | 100 | 162.1 | +62.1% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 162.2 | +62.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 118.9 | +18.9% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 30.9 | -69.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MBBC vs CHMG vs CZWI vs NBTB vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MBBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 0.03 vs NBTB's 0.89
- +54.9% vs FIS's -35.3%
CHMG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 198.0% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- NIM 3.2% vs MBBC's 2.5%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
NBTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- 19.5% margin vs MBBC's 0.4%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
- PEG 0.31 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 1.53
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 1.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.5% margin vs MBBC's 0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.9% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs MBBC's 0.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs 0.0% |
MBBC vs CHMG vs CZWI vs NBTB vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MBBC vs CHMG vs CZWI vs NBTB vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MBBC leads in 2 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • FIS leads 1 • CHMG leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 1057.8x MBBC's $10M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MBBC's 0.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $140M | $90M | $867M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $637,582 | $22M | $9M | $241M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $311,831 | $15M | $14M | $169M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $457M | $47M | $11M | $225M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.8% | +64.2% | +54.7% | +72.1% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +14.2% | +7.0% | +25.3% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +10.8% | +16.0% | +19.5% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +1.4% | +11.5% | +25.2% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.7% | +29.8% | +63.0% | +39.5% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 99% valuation discount to MBBC's 1005.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46M | $331M | $203M | $2.4B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $58M | $314M | $136M | $2.5B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1005.84x | 22.01x | 14.44x | 13.53x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.64x | 11.78x | 10.80x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.85x | 1.92x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 189.76x | 15.73x | 15.28x | 10.35x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.42x | 2.37x | 2.25x | 2.71x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 1.30x | 1.09x | 1.21x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.86x | 163.62x | 19.55x | 10.75x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $1 for MBBC. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBBC's 0.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs CHMG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.7% | +6.3% | +7.8% | +9.5% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +0.5% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.0% | +5.0% | +2.0% | +7.9% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.0% | +5.6% | +0.6% | +2.4% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.33x | 0.02x | 0.28x | 0.17x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | -$18M | -$67M | $142M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $23M | $119M | $185M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $5M | $52M | $327M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.10x | 0.44x | 0.16x | 1.05x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MBBC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MBBC five years ago would be worth $20,435 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, MBBC leads with a +54.9% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.1% | +27.0% | +21.5% | +9.3% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.9% | +54.5% | +45.6% | +9.0% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.6% | +108.2% | +160.0% | +54.1% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.4% | +70.4% | +71.2% | +29.9% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.3% | +198.0% | +157.0% | +102.2% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.4% | +27.7% | +37.5% | +15.5% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
MBBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MBBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MBBC currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.03x | 0.73x | 0.46x | 0.89x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.49 | $70.83 | $22.62 | $46.92 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.90 | $43.20 | $12.83 | $39.20 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +97.3% | +93.2% | +96.1% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 67.4 | 63.7 | 57.3 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 10K | 40K | 236K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CHMG as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -27.4% for CHMG (target: $50). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $50.00 | — | $46.00 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 2 | 10 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% | +1.8% | +3.2% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 7 | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.31 | $0.37 | $1.43 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | +3.1% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
MBBC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). NBTB leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
MBBC vs CHMG vs CZWI vs NBTB vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MBBC or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MBBC or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB or FIS?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Marathon Bancorp, Inc. at 1005. 8x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MBBC or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Marathon Bancorp, Inc.
(MBBC) delivered a total return of +104. 4%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHMG returned +198. 0% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MBBC or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marathon Bancorp, Inc.
(MBBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 03β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 3387% more volatile than MBBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 33% for Marathon Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MBBC or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marathon Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 112. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MBBC or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB or FIS?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 0. 4% for Marathon Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 0. 1% for MBBC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MBBC or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — MBBC or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB or FIS?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
5% yield), NBTB (3. 2% yield), CHMG (1. 9% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. MBBC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MBBC or CHMG or CZWI or NBTB or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, NBTB: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MBBC and CHMG and CZWI and NBTB and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (MBBC (Financial Services) and CHMG (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MBBC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. CHMG, CZWI, NBTB, FIS pay a dividend while MBBC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.