Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MBBC vs CZWI vs BWFG vs HONE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MBBC vs CZWI vs BWFG vs HONE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $46M | $203M | $415M | $522M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $90M | $208M | $314M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $312K | $14M | $35M | $26M |
| Gross Margin | 66.8% | 54.7% | 51.6% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | 7.0% | 23.3% | 10.9% |
| Forward P/E | 1005.8x | 11.8x | 9.6x | 13.3x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $52M | $180M | $517M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $119M | $225M | $231M |
MBBC vs CZWI vs BWFG vs HONE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marathon Bancorp, I… (MBBC) | 100 | 208.2 | +108.2% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 162.2 | +62.2% |
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 192.9 | +92.9% |
| HarborOne Bancorp, … (HONE) | 100 | 84.6 | -15.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MBBC vs CZWI vs BWFG vs HONE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MBBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.03 vs HONE's 1.05, lower leverage
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- 1.8% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs HONE's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
BWFG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.1%, EPS growth 261.8%
- 175.8% 10Y total return vs MBBC's 109.3%
- PEG 0.22 vs CZWI's 2.32
- NIM 2.9% vs HONE's 2.2%
HONE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 10.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.22 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MBBC's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs HONE's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs HONE's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.7% vs HONE's +7.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MBBC's 0.7% |
MBBC vs CZWI vs BWFG vs HONE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MBBC vs CZWI vs BWFG vs HONE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BWFG leads in 3 of 6 categories
MBBC leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • HONE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BWFG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HONE is the larger business by revenue, generating $314M annually — 30.5x MBBC's $10M. BWFG is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MBBC's 0.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $90M | $208M | $314M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $637,582 | $9M | $53M | $37M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $311,831 | $14M | $35M | $26M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $457M | $11M | -$5M | $46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.8% | +54.7% | +51.6% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +7.0% | +23.3% | +10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +16.0% | +16.9% | +8.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +11.5% | +12.6% | +0.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.7% | +63.0% | +2.1% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BWFG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, BWFG trades at a 99% valuation discount to MBBC's 1005.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.27x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46M | $203M | $415M | $522M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $58M | $136M | $370M | $808M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1005.84x | 14.44x | 11.71x | 18.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.78x | 9.62x | 13.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.85x | 0.27x | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 189.76x | 15.28x | 7.04x | 20.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.42x | 2.25x | 2.00x | 1.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 1.09x | 1.35x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.86x | 19.55x | 15.90x | 200.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BWFG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BWFG delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $1 for MBBC. CZWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HONE's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZWI scores 6/9 vs MBBC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.7% | +7.8% | +12.2% | +4.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.0% | +2.0% | +8.0% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.0% | +0.6% | +4.4% | +3.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.33x | 0.28x | 0.60x | 0.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | -$67M | -$45M | $285M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $119M | $225M | $231M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $52M | $180M | $517M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.10x | 0.16x | 0.49x | 0.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MBBC and CZWI and BWFG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MBBC five years ago would be worth $20,435 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,418 for HONE. Over the past 12 months, BWFG leads with a +55.7% total return vs HONE's +7.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs HONE's 16.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.1% | +21.5% | +16.1% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.9% | +45.6% | +55.7% | +7.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.6% | +160.0% | +144.3% | +58.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.4% | +71.2% | +92.1% | -5.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.3% | +157.0% | +175.8% | +88.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.4% | +37.5% | +34.7% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
MBBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MBBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HONE's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MBBC currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs HONE's 84.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.03x | 0.46x | 0.84x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.49 | $22.62 | $53.86 | $14.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.90 | $12.83 | $33.26 | $10.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +93.2% | +96.8% | +84.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 63.7 | 55.8 | 32.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 40K | 40K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CZWI and HONE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", BWFG as "Buy", HONE as "Hold". For income investors, HONE offers the higher dividend yield at 2.61% vs BWFG's 1.54%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% | +1.5% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.37 | $0.80 | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +3.1% | +0.3% | +4.1% |
BWFG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MBBC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
MBBC vs CZWI vs BWFG vs HONE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MBBC or CZWI or BWFG or HONE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HarborOne Bancorp, Inc.
(HONE) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MBBC or CZWI or BWFG or HONE?
On trailing P/E, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus Marathon Bancorp, Inc. at 1005. 8x. On forward P/E, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 22x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MBBC or CZWI or BWFG or HONE?
Over the past 5 years, Marathon Bancorp, Inc.
(MBBC) delivered a total return of +104. 4%, compared to -5. 8% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. (HONE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWFG returned +175. 8% versus HONE's +88. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MBBC or CZWI or BWFG or HONE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marathon Bancorp, Inc.
(MBBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 03β versus HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning HONE is approximately 4009% more volatile than MBBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 90% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MBBC or CZWI or BWFG or HONE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HarborOne Bancorp, Inc.
(HONE) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MBBC or CZWI or BWFG or HONE?
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 9% net margin versus 0. 4% for Marathon Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BWFG leads at 23. 3% versus 0. 1% for MBBC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MBBC leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MBBC or CZWI or BWFG or HONE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 13. 3x for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — MBBC or CZWI or BWFG or HONE?
In this comparison, HONE (2.
6% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield), BWFG (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. MBBC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MBBC or CZWI or BWFG or HONE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, HONE: +88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MBBC and CZWI and BWFG and HONE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MBBC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; HONE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CZWI, BWFG, HONE pay a dividend while MBBC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.