Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MBBC vs FXNC vs CHMG vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MBBC vs FXNC vs CHMG vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $46M | $253M | $331M | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $112M | $140M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $312K | $18M | $15M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 66.8% | 74.0% | 64.2% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | 19.6% | 14.2% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 1005.8x | 11.7x | 9.6x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $43M | $5M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $161M | $23M | $119M |
MBBC vs FXNC vs CHMG vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marathon Bancorp, I… (MBBC) | 100 | 208.2 | +108.2% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 153.8 | +53.8% |
| Chemung Financial C… (CHMG) | 100 | 162.1 | +62.1% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 162.2 | +62.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MBBC vs FXNC vs CHMG vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MBBC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in stability and momentum.
- Beta 0.03 vs CHMG's 0.73
- +54.9% vs CZWI's +45.6%
FXNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 241.1% 10Y total return vs CHMG's 198.0%
- NIM 3.6% vs MBBC's 2.5%
CHMG is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.7x)
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- PEG 2.32 vs FXNC's 7.87
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs MBBC's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs MBBC's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs CHMG's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.9% vs CZWI's +45.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs MBBC's 0.7% |
MBBC vs FXNC vs CHMG vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MBBC vs FXNC vs CHMG vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FXNC leads in 4 of 6 categories
MBBC leads 2 • CHMG leads 0 • CZWI leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FXNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHMG is the larger business by revenue, generating $140M annually — 13.6x MBBC's $10M. CZWI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MBBC's 0.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $112M | $140M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $637,582 | $25M | $22M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $311,831 | $18M | $15M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $457M | $21M | $47M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.8% | +74.0% | +64.2% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +19.6% | +14.2% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +15.8% | +10.8% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +18.7% | +1.4% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.7% | +7.1% | +29.8% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FXNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, FXNC trades at a 99% valuation discount to MBBC's 1005.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CZWI offers better value at 2.85x vs FXNC's 9.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46M | $253M | $331M | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $58M | $134M | $314M | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1005.84x | 14.27x | 22.01x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.75x | 9.64x | 11.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.55x | — | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 189.76x | 6.13x | 15.73x | 15.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.42x | 2.25x | 2.37x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 1.35x | 1.30x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.86x | 12.03x | 163.62x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $1 for MBBC. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBBC's 0.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FXNC scores 7/9 vs CHMG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.7% | +10.0% | +6.3% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +0.9% | +0.5% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.0% | +7.7% | +5.0% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.0% | +9.9% | +5.6% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.33x | 0.23x | 0.02x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | -$118M | -$18M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $161M | $23M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $43M | $5M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.10x | 0.84x | 0.44x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MBBC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MBBC five years ago would be worth $20,435 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,866 for FXNC. Over the past 12 months, MBBC leads with a +54.9% total return vs CZWI's +45.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs CHMG's 27.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.1% | +14.6% | +27.0% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.9% | +46.9% | +54.5% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.6% | +110.8% | +108.2% | +160.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.4% | +68.7% | +70.4% | +71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.3% | +241.1% | +198.0% | +157.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.4% | +28.2% | +27.7% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
MBBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MBBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHMG's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MBBC currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.03x | 0.70x | 0.73x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.49 | $29.85 | $70.83 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.90 | $18.31 | $43.20 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +93.7% | +97.3% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 47.6 | 67.4 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 80K | 10K | 40K |
Analyst Outlook
FXNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FXNC as "Buy", CHMG as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -24.9% upside for FXNC (target: $21) vs -27.4% for CHMG (target: $50). For income investors, FXNC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.19% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.00 | $50.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 7 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.2% | +1.9% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 11 | 0 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.61 | $1.31 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +3.1% |
FXNC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MBBC leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
MBBC vs FXNC vs CHMG vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MBBC or FXNC or CHMG or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). First National Corporation (FXNC) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First National Corporation (FXNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MBBC or FXNC or CHMG or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the cheapest at 14.
3x versus Marathon Bancorp, Inc. at 1005. 8x. On forward P/E, Chemung Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. wins at 2. 32x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MBBC or FXNC or CHMG or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Marathon Bancorp, Inc.
(MBBC) delivered a total return of +104. 4%, compared to +68. 7% for First National Corporation (FXNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +241. 1% versus MBBC's +109. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MBBC or FXNC or CHMG or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marathon Bancorp, Inc.
(MBBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 03β versus Chemung Financial Corporation's 0. 73β — meaning CHMG is approximately 2782% more volatile than MBBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 33% for Marathon Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MBBC or FXNC or CHMG or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marathon Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 112. 8% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MBBC or FXNC or CHMG or CZWI?
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 0. 4% for Marathon Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FXNC leads at 19. 6% versus 0. 1% for MBBC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MBBC or FXNC or CHMG or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 32x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FXNC: -24. 9% to $21. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MBBC or FXNC or CHMG or CZWI?
In this comparison, FXNC (2.
2% yield), CHMG (1. 9% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. MBBC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MBBC or FXNC or CHMG or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, CHMG: +198. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MBBC and FXNC and CHMG and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MBBC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. FXNC, CHMG, CZWI pay a dividend while MBBC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.